Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
16 November, 2012 at 11:54 pm #515376
@panda12 wrote:
ToyFoolDog, are you as ugly as you sound?
oh yeah, deffo, but not as ugly as you see.
All of which continually deflects from the thread again. . . . . (christ who let the infants loose) . . . . .. . . why criticise the artist because of the purchaser ?
16 November, 2012 at 11:43 pm #515447fair enough rose.
It’s officially here in black and white, moon is booted by JC guides on sight.
ty
16 November, 2012 at 11:40 pm #515373@jen_jen wrote:
If asking if the missus is out tonight is getting personal and is shameful, I strongly suggest you avoid the chatrooms while you’re in such a sensitive frame of mind.
gotta admit jen is right.
When discussing inherent qualities of modern art the first question is always . . . . . . . . .
‘where’s ya fookin’ husband ??’
:roll:
16 November, 2012 at 11:31 pm #515372who the hell spread that smear . . .
and what does that have with do with over-priced tripartite block paintings hanging on the walls of new york restaurants you incessantly whining, beggardly delinquent excuse of retarded mammal-imitating cretin, pawing cluelessly at a keyboard ?
no offence, just asking like
16 November, 2012 at 11:11 pm #515370@terry wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
I assumed you must be sitting alone at home, bored, hence gracing us with your illustrious presence, browbeating us with your superior wit and intelligence.
If Toyboy had the wit and intelligence you speak of it would be an amazing turnaround to the feeble, limpwristed, drug-using, woman-repelling toyboy of old.
oh look . . .
SpongeTelFookPants is trying to converse with the adults, while contributing absolutely nothing to the topic as usual.
:D
16 November, 2012 at 11:00 pm #515367well I thought we were just chatting about Rothko and having fun.
really don’t see the need about the personal stuff jen jen, but if that’s what you need to get a kick on a message board then that’s up to you.
I still blame the buyer for paying all those millions, unless it’s for some kind of investment which is all, quite frankly, beyond me.
16 November, 2012 at 10:44 pm #515364@jen_jen wrote:
Ah…you haven’t looked at his earlier work then, pre the block painting… :
well i’m waiting to be educated, but you seem a bit addicted to avoiding the subject ?
16 November, 2012 at 10:41 pm #515363and are you seriously saying I need bring your partner into this abstract and essentially meaningless discussion, as you have jen ?
jaysus, and shame on you
16 November, 2012 at 10:36 pm #515361:lol: :lol: :lol:
omg it just gets better
jen, you’re really gonna have to show me which works of tripartite block painting you’re in favour of while discriminating against which blocks of tripartite painting that really get your goat, as so many of them reach millions on the open market
And then, but not until, can we progress this further I guess
16 November, 2012 at 10:27 pm #515358thanks Mrs T
but it’s hardly the only Rothko that has exchanged for millions.+ I don’t even like him, but still, the fallacious double-standards shown on these boards tonight by regular posters are indeed astounding.
:lol:
-
AuthorPosts
