• ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    oh do shut up you boring old man…people see you for what you are, a sad perverted (and most likely bald) old man, they dont need me to point it out for them

    A simple “OOPS, busted” would have sufficed lol

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @sharongooner wrote:

    Typicaly psycopath… great work there uber. :wink: Turn the problem on the complainer.

    You really are clever. Loads of words. Lots of bullshi/t. Somewhere in there is a bit of sense. But you dont really care do you?

    What university did you go to? I must write to them and congratulate them. Did you get a 2:2?

    I think the in…

    [Read more]

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    QUOTE FROM UBER “That a non perverted hetrosexual realises that people want to watch kids being molested and THAT “makes” them become a paedo? Well no “excuse” as such, on that I agree, but I also would wonder how many people who are for whatever reason turned on by this kind of stuff can get all the kicks they require from such…

    [Read more]

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    uber just because you have a bad case of verbal diarrhea doesnt mean the rest of us have to suffer with the same affliction.

    Most of us manage to get our point across in a short sharp fashion, maybe you should try it instead of boring everyone to tears with your lengthly unintersting drivel.

    I tried that and you havent stopped…[Read more]

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @sharongooner wrote:

    ………….and of course you would know.

    PMSL.

    Touchéé, fiar cop guvnor(ess) :lol: :lol:

    :oops:

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    You might say that viewing the images is not as punishable as actually committing the offence but Paedophiles viewing images creates a demand which encourages others to continue abusing and hurting children.

    Well you COULD say that, but you could also say that apples are purple with pink stripes…

    [Read more]

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @sharongooner wrote:

    omg… just heard on ITV news about the scale of 1 to 5 of child abuse. over 60% of child abuse is a 4 to 5. it means internal abuse and/or se/x.

    This is really disturbing.

    Well it shouldnt really be that disturbing as common sense should surely have made that a fairly predictable result anyway, plus it wouldnt be so…[Read more]

  • @ubermik wrote:

    @sharongooner wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    @sharongooner wrote:

    Im in no clique. I post everywhere. Not for a minute saying you are accusing me of being in one, just clarifying a (annoyingly brought up more than others not by just you) point.

    Jeez get you lol, do you assume that every general statement is specifically about or in relation…

    [Read more]

  • @sharongooner wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    @sharongooner wrote:

    Im in no clique. I post everywhere. Not for a minute saying you are accusing me of being in one, just clarifying a (annoyingly brought up more than others not by just you) point.

    Jeez get you lol, do you assume that every general statement is specifically about or in relation to you?…

    [Read more]

  • @JohnBoy25 wrote:

    My dad fell from a four foot high ledge at work. He had to step back to allow an HGV through so this narrow ledge which was all he could step back onto was made even narrower, he landed awkwardly, he was off work and on medication for months. He got a few hundred quid compensation.

    According to the adverts – some bloke goes to…

    [Read more]

  • @sharongooner wrote:

    Im in no clique. I post everywhere. Not for a minute saying you are accusing me of being in one, just clarifying a (annoyingly brought up more than others not by just you) point.

    Jeez get you lol, do you assume that every general statement is specifically about or in relation to you? :wink:

    What I posted was a fairly acurate…[Read more]

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @sharongooner wrote:

    We will never remove such an urge within people and detecting them before they act on the impulse is hard

    Yep. Specially when people like you make it so easy to access piccys of kiddys with disgusting posts about there pictures. What a battle.

    I wonder how many paedo’s have joined/viewed this site since your post after…

    [Read more]

  • @sharongooner wrote:

    http://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?t=14614&start=0

    Bit more constructive a post lol, cheers for that as I never noticed it, am just reading through it now :)

    Ahhh, just figured out why, its on the political board :)

    Dunno if theres so few members on here that everyone posts on every board or not, but on most…[Read more]

  • ubermik replied to the topic Chris Langham in the board Getting serious 18 years ago

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    You might say that viewing the images is not as punishable as actually committing the offence but Paedophiles viewing images creates a demand which encourages others to continue abusing and hurting children.

    Well you COULD say that, but you could also say that apples are purple with pink stripes and that the moon is made out…[Read more]

  • @Anita Gofradump wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    A woman got repetitive strain injury in her thumb from typing and was awarded nearly half a million quid

    A soldier on the other hand lost both legs and sustained over 30 other injuries from a landmine and was awarded…

    [Read more]

  • @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    Ole MCanno’s had three bairns
    Where’o did one then go?
    With a look look here
    and a look look there
    here a look there a look
    everywhere a look look
    Ole Mcannos had three bairns
    Deary dear oh no

    :lol:

    Pathetic. Finding the subject of a missing (and now presumed dead) child amusing, you really are a very weird…

    [Read more]

  • Ole MCanno’s had three bairns
    Where’o did one then go?
    With a look look here
    and a look look there
    here a look there a look
    everywhere a look look
    Ole Mcannos had three bairns
    Deary dear oh no

    :lol:

  • @ForumHostPB wrote:

    Well now that all bleating lefty tree-hugging liberal conciences have been aired …. what are we left with?

    A couple of armed robbers got shot dead – big deal. They chose to go there and attempt to commit the crime but just had to go round blabbing to all their mates beforehand – and got grassed up to the Police as a…

    [Read more]

  • @fastcars wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    Anyhoo, back on track heres my theory (Well one of em anyhoo)

    It starts with a couple feeling the mundanity of married life with three kids of an age and age gap that are both tiring and stressful which commonly puts a huge strain on a relationship and sex life worsened by both people also having quite demanding…

    [Read more]

  • I think I used to be a “certain” indivudual but I cant be sure lol :lol:

    On snickers…oops, topic I mean, them coming back to the UK

    I think its a strategic move personally, I reckon initially when the bulk of media and public attention wasnt on them portugal was the comfier place as it meant they could avoid social services and the scorn of…[Read more]

  • Load More