Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 521 through 530 (of 1,198 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #498259

    Nope

    Wait til tomorrow

    Don’t mention Cheryl Cole

    #498075

    @tom wrote:

    No. I’m in form. Not on it.

    And who the hell is Van Gough? Is he related to Frank Bough?

    A dutch film-maker that was assasinated in the street by a rather peeved Muslim

    His name was Van Gogh, at least give him the respect of spelling his name right.

    #498072

    This is in form? Oh dear!!

    #498069

    @panda12 wrote:

    Tsk Words. Van Gough is related to Darren Gough. Van is Darren’s secret love child. Van is called Van because his mother is from the House of Morrison. :P

    I didn’t think Morrisons did deliveries . . .

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #498067

    Shouldn’t it be ‘on form’ not ‘in form’?

    Your command of colloquial English is suspect; are you Roman? or worse, Norman?

    And you said you shall pass, but if you pass, won’t you have to change forms?

    How shall we secure future generations if there’s so much bumming going on?

    And if you don’t care for art then what of Shakespeare? Turner? Elgar et al (bloody Romans!)

    And who the hell is Van Gough? Is he related to Frank Bough?

    And I hope you include Porter and Stout in your definition of Mead. But what about mead and fine English wines?

    These, and other questions, should be addressed before your form changes once more . . . .

    #490795

    @pepsi wrote:

    Jedward …well they did look somewhat like the twin tinmen minus the helmets…or reminiscent of Gary Glitter’s Rock’nRoll…. Parts 1&2

    Moldovia ..it was good song.

    :lol:

    BLoody Gary Glitter! ruined reminiscences of some good music.

    #497969

    @tom wrote:

    . . . . . . we don’t want tyranny, nor control, nor domination, we do not hate others and we do not wish to impose our will on others . . . . . Most of you would be up against the wall in front of the firing squad if it was up to me, cleanse the Islands of all the liberal Nazi scum.

    Well I’m conflicted. I like the peaceful independence of the former statement, but I recognise the principled entrenchment of the latter . . . . which to choose?

    There’s only one way . . . FIGHT!

    (sits back to watch Tom fight himself)

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #497968

    @panda12 wrote:

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @tom wrote:

    . . . Also, the Magna Carta clearly states that foreign rule over England is illegal. . . . .

    And yet you argue so strongly for the legacy of the House of Hanover . . . . . .

    Ah Words. You see ppl like Tom wouldn’t know hypocrisy if it walked up and smacked them in the face.

    I wonder if he actually knows The House of Windsor was the House of Saxe – Coburg and Gotha until it was changed in 1917?

    Now, Now Panda, Everyone knows supporting a Royal house that uses the French invasion of 1066 for credibility is a blow against Europe!!!

    Now if you want to support your arguments go and re-write the Magna Carta ad hoc (bloody Romans), because my great, great grandfather didn’t fight the second world war against you Human Rights and European Economic mutual interest types for nothing!

    8) :lol: 8) :lol: 8) :lol: 8) :lol: 8) :lol:

    #497846

    I had to cut and paste that by the way, can’t see meself using it again . . . .

    #490793

    @pepsi wrote:

    I still believe Tooji should have won ….

    :lol:

    Moldovia peed all over it . . . .

    And Jedward could have been drownded!!!

Viewing 10 posts - 521 through 530 (of 1,198 total)