-
Posts
-
Breaking news: Home secretary loses court appeal against afghan hijacker ruling, due to their “human rights”. They are now allowed to work here in the UK http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article1213440.ece
Do you know what folks, in this day and age, 2006, you would think that NINE people hijacking a plane in a foreign country, and landing it here ILEGALLY, would mean immediate deportation back to where they come from.
Well you would, but the people who run our country England, are TOO SOFT. Even when our HOME SECRETARY appeals against the ruling to work, HE fails MISERABLY.
What is there to stop thousand of people hijacking a plane, landing here, and claiming our taxes via human rights. Can YOU stop them?
Im telling you, this government has opened the floodgates to excessive human right ruling, and YOU will pay for it. You ARE paying for it.
Yes, we need human rights, but there needs to be a cut off point whereby people arnt allowed to take advantage of our system to this degree. It went beyond that YEARS ago.
NINE afghan criminals now walk our streets freely.
What about OUR human rights?
The Boeing 727 was hijacked on an internal flight in Afghanistan in February 2000.
The men were convicted in December 2001, but their convictions were quashed in 2003 by the Appeal Court which found they were acting under duress.
In a statement in May, the nine asylum seekers said they were desperate to be allowed to work and contribute to UK society.
They also apologised to passengers on the flight they hijacked, for the fear they had caused.
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
The Boeing 727 was hijacked on an internal flight in Afghanistan in February 2000.
The men were convicted in December 2001, but their convictions were quashed in 2003 by the Appeal Court which found they were acting under duress.
In a statement in May, the nine asylum seekers said they were desperate to be allowed to work and contribute to UK society.
They also apologised to passengers on the flight they hijacked, for the fear they had caused.
Got to agree with Emma on this one – these guys shouldn’t even have been considered for asylum in this country
Hate to say it but I have to agree with Magoo too !!!!!!
I agree up to a point. It seems that those who just want to scrounge are alowed to stay whie those who have something to offer this country – students who want to be doctors/nurses/engineers etc – that we desperately need are being deported.
In my area we have two Afghan boys who came over after seeing their parents murdered along with most of their family. At 18, they have just finished their A levels and want to go onto university, I think one want to be a doctor and the other something to do with engineering. They have been arrested and threatened with deportation.
Another girl, who was an artist, supported herself without any help from benefits, paid tax and NI, helped out at local primary school with special needs kids was deported.
Another woman who has committed large scale benefit fraud, whose son is a total nightmare (asbos the lot), used other people’s ID to fraud – and still does has been released from prison and is allowed to remain. I know who I’d rather keep!
On the other hand, can’t we do a swop? We’ll keep the imigrants who want to contribute to our way of life but give the chavs etc to any country that will have them. That should sort out the housing problem. Won’t do anything about unemployment except bring the figures down though!
As I understand it, they were fleeing the Taliban. I wonder if we’d have had as much uproar and tried to deport folk who had hijacked a ‘plane to escape from Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia?
@madcat wrote:
I agree up to a point. It seems that those who just want to scrounge are alowed to stay whie those who have something to offer this country – students who want to be doctors/nurses/engineers etc – that we desperately need are being deported.
Trained nurses and doctors are not being deported. They are leaving because the pay here isnt as good. Whilst that is happening, our government (lib dems and conservatives will do the same) encourage the better doctors from third world countries to come here, when there people need them more.
We dont need them. What we need, is to either pay ours more, or train the unemployed.
@pikey wrote:
As I understand it, they were fleeing the Taliban. I wonder if we’d have had as much uproar and tried to deport folk who had hijacked a ‘plane to escape from Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia?
Yes we would’ve, because that would’ve been illegal, and they would’ve been deported or imprisoned.
Now we have human rights laws that dont defend human’s rights, OUR RIGHTS.
Bring on the revolution. Decency cannot withstand this nonsense much more surely.
what difference would voting BNP make to this particular situation…. its already happened, so we cant say “oh if bnp were in power it would never have happened”….. that just sounds like saying anything with hindsite, which we all do!!
im anti BNP, husband is pro for the record, and im open to a good debate without any flan frowing thankyou very much!! :wink: :wink:
totally agree magoo, and again i do agree with the subject matter totally just not the thread title 8)
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!