-
Posts
-
This poor bloke was cleared of rape after the jury deliberated for just 45 minutes. His “victim” describes herself as an “occasional binge drinker” and woke up in the morning unable to reacall what happened the night before because she,d been practically comatose with booze. So if she,s too drunk to know what went on, how the hell does she know he raped her?
Women like her should be charged with wasting police time. :evil:
The anonymous female in the case was said in Court to be a solicitor (no pun intended) and was relying on a case last year in which a Judge ruled that for a female to give “full” consent to sexual intercourse, she had to be capable of giving the consent.
In last year’s case, a female was judged to be so drunk as to be incapable of giving full consent and the male was duly convicted of rape – in spite of having what he thought was consensual sexual intercourse with her.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of this particular case, it does seem to me to be totally unfair that the male should have his identity and photograph plastered all over the media whilst the female retains her right to anonymity.
Fair enough IF he was found guilty of rape ….. but he wasn’t – and in an almost record time.
Surely the fair thing in sex crimes would be to protect the identity of BOTH parties unless there is a finding of guilt.
He admitted that he intended on having a One Night Stand! So,.. Did he purposely stand back, and watch as she drank more? If so, then that’s wrong, especially if he was in a more soberish state than what she was, and if that’s the case, then he should have left Well – Alone.
Dunno but i’m off to get rat arsed and keep my fingers crossed
oh and i dont get the expression rat arsed :?
@forumhostpb wrote:
The anonymous female in the case was said in Court to be a solicitor (no pun intended) and was relying on a case last year in which a Judge ruled that for a female to give “full” consent to sexual intercourse, she had to be capable of giving the consent.
In last year’s case, a female was judged to be so drunk as to be incapable of giving full consent and the male was duly convicted of rape – in spite of having what he thought was consensual sexual intercourse with her.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of this particular case, it does seem to me to be totally unfair that the male should have his identity and photograph plastered all over the media whilst the female retains her right to anonymity.
Fair enough IF he was found guilty of rape ….. but he wasn’t – and in an almost record time.
Surely the fair thing in sex crimes would be to protect the identity of BOTH parties unless there is a finding of guilt.
i agree and i also agree with Bat, she should be charged for wasting polices time and get some bloody alcohol counselling if she cant handle what shes drinking resulting in this farce.
wooohooo said
He admitted that he intended on having a One Night Stand! So,.. Did he purposely stand back, and watch as she drank more? If so, then that’s wrong, especially if he was in a more soberish state than what she was, and if that’s the case, then he should have left Well – Alone.
most ppl at some point in there lives has slept with someone they woudnt of normally be coz of drink , and had it done to them too , its life
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!