-
Posts
-
Did you just see our new PM, what a shower of…asking us to be apart of the british governments plan to defend our country, what is he smoking, why should i help him do his job, its his job to protect me.
You know what he means dont you, were all one boat, we are “him”, he is “us”.
One world, one vision, one life, one reason.
I say we find a group of people who wont pander to moderate muslims, wont give them our taxes to blow us up, wont invade their holyland. Stand firm with brown, NO CHANCE, he is the good and decent people’s enemy!!
There was a fire in the Southall branch of KFC this afternoon. Do you suppose that it was Muslim terrorists at it again???
According to a witness on CNN, one of the men involved was on fire trying to open the boot of the car, suposedly to get some more fuel, as another witness said he saw one of them holding a petrol bomb, absolutely fanatical.
Interesting
As JFK said “ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country”
Of course Emma doesnt see it that way but I wouldnt expect her to.
I guess you only have to be lucky once but I have to say of these pumpkins trying to blow us to fe/ck…they arent very good are they? Or very intelligent?
The two at Glasgow didnt even stay and get burnt to Allah but jumped out and are now under arrest (and hence provide MI5 with loads of new leads).
And a car on fire? How long did they train for that one then? :lol: :lol:
Of course, it could have been worse but somehow I cant help think that its all very amateurish..or am I being cynical?
@johnboy25 wrote:
So if it’s their quote, why are you pointing it out to me? All I did was state that in response to something that emma said. Not my quote, not my place to answer to it. Email them.
According to one of the eyewitness, one of them was definetely shouting ‘Allah’ (or whatever it is) but he couldn’t be certain. Does that make sense to anyone? The guy was on fire. He could have been shouting ‘AARRGGHH!’
Errr, isnt the whole point of a quote (in these circumstances) that either you support the view or it substantiates the point you are making.
To post a quote as only part of a whole post and the quote have nothing to do with what you are posting seems rather silly :D
No, the whole point of a quote (in any circumstances) is just to make a point, if you don’t agree then hard nuts. Until a law gets passed stating that we need to say everything with validation, then I for one shall not bother or care.
Anyway, not that I’ll be caring how you answer cos I tend to ignore winkers, how is it not relevant? I take it you have read all the correspondence and not just chose certain aspects that have unleashed the a**e in you?
@johnboy25 wrote:
No, the whole point of a quote (in any circumstances) is just to make a point, if you don’t agree then hard nuts. Until a law gets passed stating that we need to say everything with validation, then I for one shall not bother or care.
Anyway, not that I’ll be caring how you answer cos I tend to ignore winkers, how is it not relevant? I take it you have read all the correspondence and not just chose certain aspects that have unleashed the a**e in you?
For someone who is ignoring what I say, you seem to be going to a lot of trouble to say it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
You seem to forget this a debating forum, its nothing to do with hard (or soft) nuts, its to do with apposite and opposite views.
You’re new…you’ll soon get the hang of it :wink:
One attacker, who was ablaze from head to foot according to one witness, ran after a policeman and attacked him.
One terrorist is now in hospital in critical condition with serious burns. Given that suicide attacks are an odious fact of life these days, perhaps this is the most appropriate outcome -attackers seriously injured but left alive to suffer, whilst no innocent public are hurt.
Did I say I was ignoring what you say? I recall saying ‘I tend to’ and I don’t recall saying that you were that winker with an a in question either. Another example of reading into things only what you want to see.
And you still haven’t answered my question. I suggest you read the correspondence – properly – and have a think about it. Where would you be without a newbie to keep you right? I’ll make sure you get the hang of it.
Do you think there’s any chance they could reduce the threat level for a day or two? Just to humour me, then they can change it back on the quiet.
It still reads the same to me but all roads lead to Rome
as for reducing the threat level…nah, they’ll keep it where it is for a while but tbh no one really takes much notice of it, day in day out. Its events that make people sit up and take notice- like today (ironically less of a threat but more of an image because of the pictures- guarranteed front page of every sunday newspaper tomorrow)
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!