-
Posts
-
“Replacing the brutal but inward-looking secular tyranny of Saddam Hussein with Islamist anarchy and a giant terrorist training camp was not in the British interest. Which makes Anthony Charles Lynton Blair liable for trial for planning an aggressive war and murder (of our own ill-equipped and wrongly deployed troops as well as of huge numbers of Iraqis), in addition to unconnected charges of treason and of imposing policies likely to have genocidal consequences.
It would be entirely reasonable for a future British government to hand Blair over for trialand, if found guilty, punishment by Sunni Iraq”.
If only the people of England decided to send him packing, its what you want and what he deserves right?
Over to you, the public of England.
really……
Did anyone vote for Saddam Hussein?
But Tony Blair was vote in by the public.
We can replace Tony Blair if he starts gassing people, instead of boring them to death.
Why don’t you try blaming those nice people in Iraq who are busy killing and bombing there way power?
After all it work for the IRA
Saddam got ALL the votes from a 100% turnout. Perfect leader :wink: then blair n bush came along and gatecrashed the party, jealous idiots.
@emmalush wrote:
Saddam got ALL the votes from a 100% turnout. Perfect leader :wink: then blair n bush came along and gatecrashed the party, jealous idiots.
I thought that Saddam missed out on the New Year’s party??? (Mind you he apparently had a swinging time all by himself)
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!