-
Posts
-
the blueprint for everything has always been there
@pete wrote:
I dont think religion held science back necessarily, technical expertise certainly did. The chinese who invented just about everything suddenly didnt because they didnt have glass and what they did have reacted with stuff, “western” scientists had glass which is very unreactive and so the chinese were held back. Some scientists put forward theories which possibly just weren’t questioned enough so science was held back as most took the theories as gospel till some brave soul debunked them. Religious scholars certainly ask questions. I dont think either side can simply be dismissed is my point i guess
I dunno. Id say it held us back possibly 200 years in advancement Pete at the very least. Now we move on to more modern scientific stuff. Stem cells, and religion is imposing it’s views on everyone else. Should it be allowed to do it?
They are all forms of development, the point i am making is that, if Icke is onto something, the capabilities of structural change are there……what ever procures the development of the tadpole from fish to frog, can possibly be cloned…..by as Icke would say, those who can enter another dimension…. :roll:
I have no doubt science is working on cloning humans and all sorts of unethical practises, should it be allowed to do that, of course religion should be allowed to ask questions, religion cant impose anything, man might as a power trip, and use religion as the excuse, but religion cant stop me doing anything.
@pete wrote:
I have no doubt science is working on cloning humans and all sorts of unethical practises, should it be allowed to do that, of course religion should be allowed to ask questions, religion cant impose anything, man might as a power trip, and use religion as the excuse, but religion cant stop me doing anything.
Religion is belief in something that’s never been proven all. Science has proven itself time and time again. Why should we give religion any repect at all?
What Im saying is that the invisible being over that way dosent like stem cell research, or gay sex, or numerous other things. It’s never been proven that the invisble being ever has or ever will exist though.
@Bad Manners wrote:
@gazlan wrote:
Whatever your opinion is of Icke, his research as far as the ` reptilians ` are concerned, it cannot be denied that from ancient times to the prersent, the reptile/serpant has been prominant in most religions and country`s….Billions believe in ` a creator `that never shows its presence, yet people claim Icke to be some mad man for daring to speak of alien interference in human genes…… take the tadpole for instance, it has the obvious capabilities of metamorphis….. so the shift in appearance is a possibility.
Shut up about fcking Icke. He’s a fcking bampot. :roll:
Can I nominate this for post of the week? :lol:
Religion itself isn’t holding science back, it never has, but it has been used by those fearful of progress as a stick to beat down anything that challenges the status quo…and that reaches far beyond science.
We have evolved, why shouldn’t “God” have evolved, and why hasn’t religion been allowed to evolve?
Man is responsible for holding back the evolution of religion because holding on to the dark ages of religion allows many people to exert an influence over things that challenge them and put them in a place of fear that they wouldn’t otherwise have any grounds or power to challenge. This is abuse of religion, which is the fault of man, not “God”.
Not expressing myself very well here but I know what I mean :lol:
@gazlan wrote:
They are all forms of development, the point i am making is that, if Icke is onto something, the capabilities of structural change are there……what ever procures the development of the tadpole from fish to frog, can possibly be cloned…..by as Icke would say, those who can enter another dimension…. :roll:
I hope who-ever shot that film reported them goings on…. :o :)
Moving on :lol: It does appear that Icke is not the only one out there that suspect our world leaders and, many celebrities of being in cahoots with this satanic worship and secret societies…
I Love You, Devil?
The “El Diablo” hand sign often is con-fused with the deaf hand signal of the phrase, “I love you.” While at first this appears an odd resemblance, we register an “ahh, I get it!” emotion when we discover that the person who invented, or created, the hand sign system for the deaf, Helen Keller, was herself an occultist and Theosophist. Did Keller purposely design the deaf’s “I love you” sign to be such a remarkable imitation of the classic sign of Satan? Was Keller saying, basically, “I love you, Devil?” —Texe Marrs, CODEX MAGICA
“She invented over 60 different signs by which she could talk to her family before the age of seven. For example, if she wanted ice cream she would wrap her arms around herself and pretend to shiver.”
The sight i linked to earlier in this thread shows the hand sign given by numerous world leaders and celebs… What can be the purpose of this sign ? could it be they are gesturing ` i love you ` as the deaf communicate ? or is there a sinister motive to show that they all have the same belief in the satan? Stay tuned for further developments cummin atcha…. :D :wink:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!