-
Posts
-
PB
goodnight Ugly
Emma x
I hope you’ve got the staircase reinforced now Emma.
@geoff wrote:
I see so now you accuse me of ‘harassing’ users.
Selective memory kicking in again Geoff? How could anyone forget the
vicious lies you told regarding BB and her mother? I imagine Sian felt
quite harassed by you recently too!
I deal in facts not fantasy Geoff.(As this paragraph has been repeated several times already, could you
please simply type ”Statement A” in future so as to save on storage space.
Thank you. – Ed)OK PB, will do!
@tommy-toxen wrote:
Are you suggesting Emma is a bit of a fatty??
Couldn’t she be sued for breaching “the sales of goods act”? Surely her avatar is misleading!
I suspect that the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 is the appropriate piece of legislation here.
The avatar and the siggy pic are both intentionally misleading in that they portray a slim and attractive female – one who is definately less than a ”generous size 12” anyway. It is apparent from other customer’s statements that neither description is true.
If any user feels that they have been mislead, they are urged to report this to their local Trading Standards Officer for action to be taken.
JustChat cannot be held responsible for any misrepresentation of this nature, whether innocent or otherwise.
I’m sure you’re right Tommy, but misrepresentation is still misrepresentation – innocent or otherwise.
I expect that there’s a queue outside the Trading Standards Office by now.
@tommy-toxen wrote:
but then again… i’m not a 2 ft tall animated rugby-ball headed mini hitler baby obsessed on killing his parents and dominating the world…!!!
tut tommy im disillusioned now :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
@forumhostpb wrote:
I’m sure you’re right Tommy, but misrepresentation is still misrepresentation – innocent or otherwise.
Would you consider ‘missrepresentation’ to be a misrepresentation of ‘misrepresentation’?
Innocent or otherwise. :)
@The Observer wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
I’m sure you’re right Tommy, but misrepresentation is still misrepresentation – innocent or otherwise.
Would you consider ‘missrepresentation’ to be a misrepresentation of ‘misrepresentation’?
Innocent or otherwise. :)
Yes, provided that this was actually her name. If not then of course it is a misleading trade description.
Well i am back for more insults
just carry on low lifes
PB as for you, you the biggest scum going. how can you pull someone to pieces when you are an overweight balding 50 odd year old bloke??
:lol:
Emma x
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!