To all it may concern

@johnboy25 wrote:

and to be honest Pats
I don’t fekkin blame you
Perhaps in the future the government will look to banning all photos of children
from newspapers, catalogues and magazines
No tv or films will be made with anyone under 16
just in case

Most of the TV & films I watch features 18+ females anyway.

Me too :wink:

@bon bon wrote:

@pats wrote:

well i’m really sorry for offending johns sensibilities with my tongue in cheek remark. after reading this thread and the gut churning hypocrosy i have removed the offending pictures and promise to reign in my humour in future.
hopefully now johnboy can post without reproach and others who find pics of children upsetting can rest easy.
now i shall go and throw up.

and to be honest Pats
I don’t fekkin blame you
Perhaps in the future the government will look to banning all photos of children
from newspapers, catalogues and magazines
No tv or films will be made with anyone under 16
just in case

So you’re ignoring the first rule of posting on a website such as this..not to give out private information and most definately NOT to post photographs of your children?
It wasn’t so long ago that Pats felt compelled to withdraw photos of her grandchildren after Anita made a sickening attack on them. Short memories some folks have.

@fastcars wrote:

@bon bon wrote:

Perhaps in the future the government will look to banning all photos of children
from newspapers, catalogues and magazines
No tv or films will be made with anyone under 16
just in case

I dunno who to be more worried about… the 1% of the population who are child perverts or you politically correct sad bas@tards[/quot

are you calling me a politically correct sad bas tard?