-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
WTF does asylum have to do with a tourist getting robbed in Leicester Sq. Do you think translators and interpreters exist only to work with asylum seekers?
THIS THREAD IS ABOUT THE MONEY WASTED USING INTERPRETERS VIA ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES, AS STATED IN THE FIRST POST.
Tomorrow when you wake up, just give your head a slight tap.
Don’t you think it would help if you actually read the stuff on the pages that you provide a link for? It says:
“Interpreters are used in a variety of crucial roles, ranging from an interview with a foreign driver involved in a road collision to interpreting documents used in major investigations of serious crime.”
Since the article you provided a link to doesn’t talk exclusively of asylum seekers but also all other aspects in which interpreter services are used by the police it undermines your case that using interpreters is a waste of tax-payers money. Can you actually give us a figure for how much money is spent by the police on interpreters for asylum seekers? I’m just wondering how you can say it’s a waste of money if you don’t actually know how much the bill is. So tell us exactly how much money any of the UK police forces spends on interpreter services for asylum seekers and refugees SPECIFICALLY.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Since the article you provided a link to doesn’t talk exclusively of asylum seekers but also all other aspects in which interpreter services are used by the police it undermines your case that using interpreters is a waste of tax-payers money.
We waste tax payers money via asylum seekers, refugees and looking after you if its ever needed.
Can you actually give us a figure for how much money is spent by the police on interpreters for asylum seekers?
Considering the nature in which you behave, are you worthy of such information.
I’m just wondering how you can say it’s a waste of money if you don’t actually know how much the bill is.
1p is too much, let alone £33 – £66 per hour. The vastness of the money spent is alarming. If you cant hear the alarm get some new batteries.
ZZZZzzzzzzzzzz..Oh sh/ite Emma..have I slept through Spooks? AND The news At Ten? [-X
You’re gonna get a Scot for Prime Minister anyway. :wink:
Considering the nature in which you behave, are you worthy of such information.
Clearly you are incapable of answering the question and hence resort to insult to divert attention away from your inability to respond
@slayer wrote:
Clearly you are incapable of answering the question and hence resort to insult to divert attention away from your inability to respond
Not incapable. Why should i take part in a question by someone who loves insulting me. When he learns how to play the game, he may find its fun.
I take it that’s a no then? Funny, it sounded like you were convinced that vasts amounts of police funds were being spent on interpreters for asylum seekers. Are you now saying that you didn’t actually know what you were talking about? Could it possibly be that your far-right propaganda doesn’t stand up to the least bit of scrutiny?
What if an asylum seeker or refugee who spoke little English had information relating to a crime, would you tell them to come back when their standard of English is better? The irony of course Emma is that there are plenty of asylum seekers and refugees who speak better English than you.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Funny, it sounded like you were convinced that vasts amounts of police funds were being spent on interpreters for asylum seekers.
Not only does it sound like vast amounts, it is vast amounts. As i said, 1p is TOO much.
What if an asylum seeker or refugee who spoke little English had information relating to a crime, would you tell them to come back when their standard of English is better?
Do you even know what this subject is about???
Let me explain it to your THICK head again. Its about WASTING decent tax payers money. Solving a crime is not wasting money.
The irony of course Emma is that there are plenty of asylum seekers and refugees who speak better English than you.
You have trouble reading, so when you reply its like listening to a 4 year old.
Your last post contradicts your entire argument. You say spending money on interpreters is a waste of money but then you say solving crimes is not a waste of money. Why do you think the police use interpreters? Do you think it gets a bit boring inside police stations and so the officers feel like chatting in exotic languages?
Once again your argument falls apart quicker than Dickie Barnbrook of the BNP can say “Hello Sailor”.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Your last post contradicts your entire argument. You say spending money on interpreters is a waste of money but then you say solving crimes is not a waste of money.
Whilst there here, using them to defend decency is ok. BUT, WE DO NOT NEED ASYLUM SEEKERS HERE, so we shouldn’t be spending 1p on ANY of them.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!