-_-

I have to get back to work now, so I won’t be able to reply until about 1am UK time.

I don’t understand why people care about the size of Trump’s crowd size. D.C. voted 92% Clinton, and it was raining. So it would be expected that not many people there wanted to attend.

That was more of a joke than a serious point, but its interesting that you don’t refer to them as communists, which they were.

I don’t see how pointing out…[Read more]

I don’t understand why people care about the size of Trump’s crowd size. D.C. voted 92% Clinton, and it was raining. So it would be expected that not many people there wanted to attend.

That was more of a joke than a serious point, but its interesting that you don’t refer to them as communists, which they were.

I don’t see how pointing out…[Read more]

I don’t understand why people care about the size of Trump’s crowd size. D.C. voted 92% Clinton, and it was raining. So it would be expected that not many people there wanted to attend.

That was more of a joke than a serious point, but its interesting that you don’t refer to them as communists, which they were.

I don’t see how pointing out…[Read more]

I don’t understand why people care about the size of Trump’s crowd size. D.C. voted 92% Clinton, and it was raining. So it would be expected that not many people there wanted to attend.

That was more of a joke than a serious point, but its interesting that you don’t refer to them as communists, which they were.

I don’t see how pointing out…[Read more]

Yes, because the standards of rigour in modern academic literature is so high.

I’ve read a lot worse papers than that one, but its the only one I had a link to on hand.

“Other literature tackles emotional, psychological, and sexual interactions with glaciers.” (Pp 18)

Yes, because the standards of rigour in modern academic literature is so high.

I’ve read a lot worse papers than that one, but its the only one I had a link to on hand.

Yes, because the standards of rigour in modern academic literature is so high.

I’ve read a lot worse papers than that one, but its the only one I had a link to on hand.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/20/anti-donald-trump-activists-try-block-access-inauguration/

Google is hard

Hillary got more votes than Obama in the 2012 primaries, but that isn’t how US politics works.

I like Ron Paul, but I very much doubt he will run. But it will probably be a 2nd term for Trump I believe.

Also there was this abomination of a sign :

Does that include the anarcho-communist elements of the march?

Israel’s government is in the wrong here, but i’m not sure how it’s relevant to US political protests. But it’s not like Palestine is innocent either.

It wouldn’t be very effective propaganda if it was so obvious.

Not a huge enough number to win the election though, they lost.

The left was in power for 8 years, why would be people be protesting the right?

If you believe that then you are more delusional than I thought. I guess the CIA wasn’t lying when they said Sadam had WMDs…[Read more]

It wouldn’t be very effective propaganda if it was so obvious.

Are you sure you don’t want to attack him anymore?

Maybe you should tell the islamists that then.

I have never personally been suppressed by our society, infact women have more rights than men in most areas of the law.

Maybe you should tell the Islamists that then.

I have never personally been suppressed by our society.

Here is an example of her strongly implying that Sharia should take over America:

For additional context:

Not enough to know what a burqa is apparently.