[anc]

A ‘smac’ arrrr ooo meeee from Coseeeeeeeeeeee?! :lol:

[anc]

“hockney” sounds like either a dance or a drink!! lol

Talking of ‘dance’ – I loved PE blah de blah, but dance (dramatic, not ballet)?! We all looked like a load of maggots gone wrong ffs – I am sure that it was the teacher getting us all in our blue t-shirts and grey nic-nocs! :shock: Yeah, must have been a sight! :lol:

[anc]

@panda12 wrote:

This gorgeous geezer should have been Bond!

Is that Keith Floyd?!!! :lol:

Told ya that ‘here comes Sgt P’!! :D

[anc]

@panda12 wrote:

@rogue trader wrote:

yes panda,thank you,but do you see what i mean? its all ifs and butts
i.e could have gone
would have gone
should have gone

well i tell you what folks i wont offer again,sort your own meets out
i was even gonna invite martin and ld

yours disappointingly
billy no mates.

Ifs and buts indeed.

If I’d have known the date and time I’d have got my furry b&w butt up there and taken up residence in Pleasureland making myself go dizzy and sick on mad rollercoaster rides.

I might even have bought a giant golly.

Named ‘Jack’! :lol:

[anc]

Looks a bit like Michael J, before the face-lifts and ‘die’! Does ‘Jack’ sing to ya panda? :lol:

[anc]

desmondy wrote:

History is written by the victors, as they say. The modern perception of Richard derives from Thomas More and Shakespeare. More was a bit of a Tudor spin-doctor before losing his head and we all know that Shakes was writing entertainment for the public and his Tudor queen.
As has been said Henry had more of a motive for doing away with the princes, and Henry proved to have no qualms about judicial murder. Richards young nephew the earl of Warwick for instance. No-one can say for sure. The princes ‘disappeared’ in 1483 but did they die in 1483?

As for where he (if it is him) should be buried, well I say York. Westminster and Windsor have enough royalty.

Apologies for putting this back on topic…..[/quote]

‘Tis that panda’s fault! :D [/b]

[anc]

<<<<<<<<<<<<digs out old fluffy ear-muffs :wink: :lol:

[anc]

That was extremely subtle of me scep – make the most of it! :lol:

[anc]

@panda12 wrote:

@sceptical guy wrote:

Nobody is too cute to be tortured….

and I would like to assure all my well-wishers here that it was not me who killed the Princes.

Their skeletons were discovered, by the way, during an excavation of the Tower in 1674, so by 1674 they were dead. Of that, there can be no doubt..I don’t think so anyway.

I’m far too cute to be tortured, Scep.

Just look @ me – I’m irresistable!

Blimey! Talk about bending over! :lol:

Probs that curry you ate last night! Did I tell you I hid sliced cucumber in it?! :lol:

[anc]

I’ve recorded it – gonna watch it later, and see what all the hoo-ha is about!

[Author]

Posts