Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Islamic theology inherently commands active warfare against Western nations – to take them over and turn them into Islamic societies.
Do no other religions contain teachings or theologies that discriminate against others or command warfare on others? Is Islam unique in this regard?
Some discriminate a little bit maybe in terms of a few petty minor things, yeah… but absolutely nowhere near the level of the pure vitriol that’s contained within Islam. The majority of the scripture is dedicated towards deriding non-Muslims as being sub-human excrement that needs to be fought against until they are either subdued under Islamic rule, or wiped out. This is why, in accordance with Islamic theology, non-Muslims are ultimately given three options: to convert to Islam, to pay the jizya (extortion tax) under Islamic rule, or be killed. These three choices that all non-Muslims face, pretty much sums up the entirety of Islam.
To elaborate a bit more though, the main reasons that Islam is unique from other religions is:
1) The guy who founded it, the prophet Muhammad, is the only founder of a major religion to also be a warrior and a psychopathic war lord. All Islamic scripture is essentially based on the words and deeds of him, so it’s a given that the nature of the religion will also reflect his character and desires – which just so happens to be both inherently intolerant and brutal against anyone and everyone that refuses to submit to his command and rule (i.e all non-Muslims). Cue jihad:
2) The doctrine of jihad – understood as the obligation of the Ummah (Muslim community) to conquer and subdue the world in the name of Allah and rule it under Sharia law. This doctrine is a result of Muhammad giving the decree to his followers that they’ve “been ordered by Allah to fight men [all men] until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger.” No other mainstream religion that I’m aware of gives what amounts to a standing order to forcefully wage war and commit violence against the rest of the world, simply on account of them not adhering to the religion. Some religions have rules for retaliating against attacks for self-defence purposes for sure, and some encourage it’s followers to proselytize in attempt to softly persuade people to convert; but jihad is intrinsically unique in that it prescribes for Muslims to be the initiators of all forms of aggression towards all others (all non-Muslims and non-Islamic societies) until they’re either converted to Islam, in a state of submission under Islamic rule, or perish. With Islam, non-Muslims simply don’t have a choice to live freely.
3) Sharia law – a legal and political framework embedded within the religion that dictates precisely how any given society under Islam should be run. This makes Islam not just a religion, but also a political ideology. Forget the idea of Muslims following the laws of whatever non-Islamic land they’re in (as other religions allow of their adherents), Sharia law is all that matters as it’s held to be the laws that Allah himself wants everyone to live by, so they are the only laws that Muslims are obligated to abide by and must also strive to bring about. (Also hope it doesn’t need pointing out how Sharia law pretty much completely contrasts with Western laws/values.)
4) Deception. Muslims are permitted and encouraged to lie and use all forms of deception towards non-Muslims in order to the further the goals of Islam (i.e to protect Islam and to bring about global Islamic hegemony with Sharia being the ruling system of governance everywhere).
It’s essentially a religious flavour of Nazism on steroids whereas other religions aren’t, and is why all other mainstream religions can peacefully coexist with one another as equals, whereas Islam cannot peacefully coexist with any of them. Islam is inherently supremacist and seeks to dominate and extinguish all alternative religions and all opposing values that run contrary to it, and which is why it needs to be squashed sooner than later.
No, Muslims mustn’t integrate more; they must be forced into an ultimatum of either renouncing Islam or being ostracised and/or deported. Islamic theology inherently commands active warfare against Western nations – to take them over and turn them into Islamic societies. Those who are happy to identify as Muslims need to be treated as if they were infected Ebola patients, and only be allowed to integrate with society at large once they’re free from the virus and are no longer posing a threat.
Feel free to leave.
No, BB.
I’m not answering you after your comments on the Jo Cox thread.
You seem a bit brighter than SHR, but just as disgusting.
I’m sure you’ll crow but I feel slightly bilious at the thought of discussing anything with you at the moment, to be honest.
For anyone else, good points were made in the debate last night on BBC, but if anyone has any different points to raise, I’ll happily attempt to answer them. Migrant Watch misuse figures with false assumptions about Turkish entry, and extrapolate projections into the future which are universally agreed to be meaningless.
I absolutely love mass uncontrolled immigration, you xenophobic and close-minded little Brits who are against it just need to practice more tolerance.
It’s vote day guys.
Potentially once in a life time opportunity.Lets be bold and take control of our own destinies and our own country, and to help lead the way for other proud EU nations to follow in our footsteps – free from the tight grasp of undemocratic and unaccountable power-hungry EU overlords.
The pub bore could have made a non political RIP thread, but chose not to.
Right?
Practically all the posts here by slippery scep have been to push a political agenda – to bolster the remain campaign and to smear and demonise Brexit through means of guilt by association. Yet when confronted, he tries to pass everything off as being nothing more than a benign tribute, whilst declaring how it is those who challenge his propaganda that are the bad people for apparently being the ones to politicise things. More slippery than an eel.Anyone who doubts the real agenda here only need to look at this predictable post in reply to me, you can almost feel the excitement of him thinking “Aha! Gotcha now!” as he moves in to try to seal the deal.
And just for the record: none of the posts I’ve made here would exist if I thought that this was nothing other than a genuine tribute thread. And with that, I am out. R.I.P. Jo Cox.
Okay.
No rush.
“If you have to exploit a murder victim to make your case, then you’ve lost the argument.”
One thing is certain. Despite the crocodile fake tears, this man has not donated a single penny to the Jo Cox memorial fund and neither has he attended a single one of the various vigils held in her memory. The pub bore parrots what he reads in the media and then attempts to pass it off as his own views.
Vermin.
Yep, truth be known, people like slippery scep here probably secretly love the fact that she was killed, because it’s allowed them the chance to do exactly what they’re doing now with running this smear and demonisation campaign against Brexiteers and the Brexit position.
Very devious people.
Hopefully the decent majority will see through it come vote day.
That was to Alf Garnett btw the way BB, not you, I inadvertently pressed the wrong quote.
Lol, s’cool.
