Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
31 July, 2006 at 2:33 pm #232927
@bat wrote:
@American Woman wrote:
Ok, I’ll just call a spade a spade here. The magazine published the picture n the cover to grasp the people’s attention in order to sell the magazine in order to make the profit. I highly doubt the editors where thinking “what a beautiful picture of a mother giving nourishment to her child”. I’m not at all saying that I disagree with these types of pictures of breastfeeding, but I don’t think it has to be on the front cover and exploited for profit. Just as women have the right to nurse in public, individuals also have the right to disagree with it and maybe it shouldn’t be thrown in their face. I’m an adult and the picture does not offend me in the least. But, some parents don’t want their children seeing that image and that should also be respected. Therefore I think the picture should have been placed on the inside of the magazine. I highly agree with breastfeeding. It’s the best form of nutrition you can give your child. I do think that discretion is key though. Women were blessed with breasts to feed their offspring. But when not used for their main purpose, breasts are used for sexual arousal. Some people just can’t separate the two points. Breastfeeding is also an intimate bonding time with your child, which is why I think just tossing a nursery blanket over feeding time is appropriate.
AW I also dont want to walk into my local newsagents every day and see the Daily Sport, with gross images, and they ARE gross, of women with everything spread so wide you can see what they had for breakfast. No not everyone wants to see a picture of a woman breasfeeding her child on a magazine, but in all honesty, which is the worse of the two? As for children seeing that image.. I have no problem atall with either of my children seeing a picture of a mother breastfeeding her child. Thats how mine were fed… if your going to start saying cover it up, it makes it into something dirty, to be ashamed of, and it,s not. FFS someone please tell me, I did ask before, what century are we living in, when a photo of a mother breastfeeding her child is deemed offensive? I despair at this world sometimes I really do.
I was going to say that, Top shelf stuff is worse all kids know where it is and i see them staring up all the time. You see a huge pair of boobs with a tiny littlw star to cover the nipple but you can see what it means and open leg covers with a tiny star covering her “modesty”. I would rather see aa baby feeding than some 40+ readers wife open legged looking slaggy on the front.
31 July, 2006 at 9:43 am #232921@abitofmary_j wrote:
@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
@drivel wrote:
having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!
How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest Becky if a lady want’s to get her breasts out in public – but why all the fuss about it
Why get them out to prove the point that this is 2006 and yes its pcSurely its better to go somewhere private – most supermarkets have feeding rooms now – and do it there ( would u eat your dinner in a 4 x 4 box ?? )All this new age pc – I’m a modern woman – I can get my tits out anywhere I want to feed my baby – is just a bit ott – methinks
Unfortunetly babies feed on demand Drivel….. and the first few weeks their constantly snuggling in and feedin away quiet contented…… without a care in the world….
people seem to forget…. their natural things breasts…. not sexual…. where was formula milk back in the year dot…??? its men whom has made breasts a sexual object…. MEN…
did you also know that breast feeding is actually fairly stressfull as it is…. make sure baby is latched on etc… and is actually feedin…!! When woman are made to feel degraded becuase they are giving their child the best milk for them… cause stress and anxiety inwhich cause the baby a stressfull thing whilest tryin to feed…. so GUYS…. REM… your shock n horror at the most natural thing being done…. causes more grief,….
as been said before…. Ive breastfeed both my children and did so without as you say… whippin my tit out….. I did so because it was a natural thing to do…. and I wasnt doin anything wrong… or immoral…!!! woman have breasts to nurture…. not for a quick grope from a man…!!
You said everything spot on =D> =D>
31 July, 2006 at 9:16 am #232918@drivel wrote:
having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!
How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??
31 July, 2006 at 8:32 am #233008Summer of 6666666666999999999999999999 tuneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 8)
31 July, 2006 at 8:17 am #232966I dont use the rooms now sick of all the tw@ts in there to be honest. I only use these boards on a hop and a catch now. This place is going way way down and its a shame it used to be nice.
31 July, 2006 at 7:23 am #232916@slayer wrote:
@rubyred wrote:
ah so HIDE it away you mean ?? pretend babies DONT need fed? little innocents ! so a breast fed child,clutching on a mothers breast offends ye…by god YOU need mothered !
Was that “mothered” or “smothered” :D
I’ll reply to you Ruby rather than take Tommy’s attempt at bait
Nothing more natural than breast feeding and nothing less sexual
Agreed its nothing sexual at all, its very beautiful and the most natural thing on this planet. But again yes there are some sick people out there but they probably get turned on by kids mags on the shelf.
29 July, 2006 at 7:17 am #232500@tommy ToXen wrote:
Hang people who abuse animals.
Animal abuse will drop.
It’s hardly rocket science ‘innit
Jesus sometimes I feel like I’m the only person in the country that actually cares about victims of abuse – There seems to be only me who ever wants Justice for them.
No i’m behind you on that one. Like i say animals can’t defend themsleves

28 July, 2006 at 6:02 pm #232551Anything is better than chico :lol:
28 July, 2006 at 1:40 pm #231016@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
@drivel wrote:
I wear fully camouflaged combat gear and a bergen on my back , with uzi and cuthroat at the ready for any terrorist attacks
My my i bet foreplay is a blast in your bed :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
literally – god knows how many exes have “pulled the pin” The back garden is like the Somme now
Now thats a story for down the pub :wink: :lol:
28 July, 2006 at 1:16 pm #231014 -
AuthorPosts
