Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1,001 through 1,010 (of 1,294 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #247609

    Cas

    Having just had one of those Bat (without the burger tho :wink: ) i’m gigglin my head off :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #247579

    Cas

    :cry: Words fail me.

    The parents of the 4 YEAR OLD! who want their doctor to put their child on anti-depressants, because she’s so depressed that she can’t go to the school she wants to go to!!!! should read this and feel deeply ashamed!

    #247614

    Cas

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    Interesting theory … but it didn’t work though did it???

    It didn’t make any difference PB no, but i’m afraid on this one I do agree with Emma!!!!! wow!!!! :lol:

    It’s all about votes isn’t it, and who can look best, so really yea, i’d agree. Also it does sicken me to my stomach, that someone like this gets 40 years, while Ian Huntley relaxes in his ‘special’ cell. I bet he sleeps soundly at night too, which is more than can be said for the parents of Holly and Jessica. :evil:

    #244394

    Cas

    Strange that all the people shouting about this woman’s right to wear her veil haven’t said anything about both Tiggy and myself mentioning that she didn’t wear one at the interview for the job, with a man!! :lol:

    and theres more ………………………

    A trial was halted yesterday because the Defence Lawyer, refused to remove her veil, at the request of the judge, as he couldn’t ”clearly” understand what she was saying. I think if I had a defence lawyer speaking for me i’d want to know that the people in court who mattered would be able to clearly understand what she was saying. Doesn’t seem so un-reasonable to me, but the trial was halted. I wonder if she’ll be charged with contempt, any one of us would no doubt find ourselves in that position, had we challenged the court as she did. Another case of jumping on the bandwagon I think :roll: :roll:

    #247374

    Cas

    @ugo wrote:

    Hmmm …….!!!

    ??????????????????????


    PB!!!!!!!!! I DIDN’T KNOW YOU’D CHANGED YOUR NAME!!!!!!!!!!!!

    #247372

    Cas

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    Our local BNP spokesperson has gone uncharacteristically quiet methinks.

    It is, I suspect, because Emma’s two principal scriptwriters are banged up on remand awaiting their big day at Leeds Crown Court.

    Meanwhile, all the neo-Nazi skinheads that voted for the lovely (and bankrupt) Sandra Doncaster are currently unrepresented on their Local Authority. I wonder if they’ll all have a whip round to pay off her debts???

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    You are funny sometimes PB. After a bit of a horendous weekend you brought a smile and a giggle. Ta :lol: :lol:

    #247370

    Cas

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    Oh dear oh dear – Emms’s not going to like this one little bit. Bet she calls you a Fascist or denounces the ”lies of the anti BNP press”.

    (BTW the anti BNP press is ALL the press with the exception of official BNP publicity releases).

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Wouldnt be the first time PB :roll: and I got broad shoulders :lol: :roll:

    #247112

    Cas

    @bob2go wrote:

    @emmalush wrote:

    You are missing the point. What Nick said to those who wanted to hear what he had to say, did in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM cause hatred, he is INNOCENT, the crown prosecution know this, new labour know this, and so do every right minded individual on planet earth.

    Did you mean on Planet Emma?

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    :-k Wonder if Emma drives a car with fluffy dice and EMMA n NICK in big letters on the windscreen :lol: :roll: :roll:

    #247110

    Cas

    Nick Griffin and INNOCENT in the same sentence……………………….funniest thing I seen all week.

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #247257

    Cas

    @peeved wrote:

    I blame the parenting, the lack of respect for our elders, so many children let to roam the streets until all hours.

    There should be strict guidelines, children must learn what’s appropiate behaviour, this seems to have been lost.

    I spose I have to say that in part I agree. I finish work at 10 o/c on the nights that I work, I get home around 10.20, driving home from work there are lots of kids around, standing on street corners in gangs of 4 or 5, often more, some of these kids seem to be little more than about 8 to 10 years old. What are they doing on street corners at that time of night, they should be home Where are their parents!! In the pub? maybe? or simply couldn’t care less, as long as their little darlings aren’t giving them grief?

    There’s also of course, our seemingly ”nanny” state now, where a lot of the powers of parents, have been eroded to the point of non-existence. Tony says were not allowed to chastise our children anymore, not allowed to smack our children anymore. Wasn’t there a case in point this week, when a father pulled the duvet off his lazy son, who refused to get out of bed and go to school. The boy called the police and his father was arrested for assault!!!!! The boy seemingly did try to stop it all, after realising he’d gone too far, but his father was arrested non the less. Strange that, because I can 100% guarantee that someone reading this, would have had a real need for the police on occassion and been told that theyre too busy at the moment to come out. No doubt out arresting fathers for chastising their lazy children…………

    Had this particular parent ignorned the fact that his son wasn’t going to school, he’d have been threatened with prosecution by the authorities, so parents can’t win really, can they :roll:

Viewing 10 posts - 1,001 through 1,010 (of 1,294 total)