Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
29 January, 2008 at 5:21 pm #307705
@bat wrote:
Almost every week, in some magazine or other, I read a story about yet another stupid sad middle aged old bag, who has been duped by a foreign man, (who is usually about 10 years or so younger than her) into beleiving that he loves her, and she,s the love of his life etc. Here,s another one. For crying out loud this one is 63, and she actualy thought this much younger man, from Jamacia, wanted her? Derrrrr, he fleeced her out of all her savings is what he did. Sometimes it,s men from Nigeria or Tunisia as well. When will these stupid middle aged women learn? ffs it,s pathetic. Get a bloody grip. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
linkThere was one not so long back Bat. This was a woman I believe in her 70’s with a toyboy from Turkey who fleeced her out of what she had. I can’t remember it all but she was apparently barred from a lot of bars and restaurants in Turkey lol.
It hasn’t deterred her,,,,,she was talking of going back to find the ”love of her life” lol
27 January, 2008 at 12:38 pm #303775@reason wrote:
Silly silly cas me has been to two meets…….so you just made yourself look a silly billy……….did i say just?!!!!
I dont give a rats a rse how many other meets youv’e been to,,,,,I was talking about this one,,,and about the amount of pple now not going because of your abusiveness and threats.
People aren’t not going because they’re worried about the threats of who’s fookin head you might or might not rip off, more that they don’t want or need the aggravation. So it really doesn’t matter how may you have or haven’t been to in the past. Plenty pple now not going to this one because of you. So, there you go,,,,,something for you to be proud of yrself about :roll: :roll:
27 January, 2008 at 8:09 am #302189@Bad Manners wrote:
@bat wrote:
And for the latest in this bloody fiasco.
As usual the above link isnt true.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,31100-1302507,00.html
Strictly speaking its not untrue either is it.
Your link says that it has been discussed but the issue of money hadn’t come into it. Plus of course the fact that under portuguese law they still remain suspects and in that, they’re not allowed to discuss any details of the case. I wonder then if all this is being stored up, so to speak, to continue with once the authorities either charge them with a crime, or release them from any suspicion.
26 January, 2008 at 12:52 pm #303771@bat wrote:
@reason wrote:
Well i don’t know exactly where you stupid pair of bastads,i do know the date but i’m sure plenty of people from forties will be able to inform you of where it is…………..so please come along,i’m gonna be bored without some tossa turning up,yes yes i’m gonna be there,beat ya to it P B ya wanka………..oh yes and i will be with sarah so that’s gonna fooook up ya fantasy of meeting a lady boy PB
Remember i don’t fookin care!
Hang on a minute. So now, after all this, your trying to bluster and bullshit your way out of it, by saying you don,t know where the meet is, that YOU have been invited too? Everyone else knows except you? Yeah right, of course we beleive that. ffs. :roll: :
As Cath has said on another thread Bat. Most pple are backing out of the Leeds meet now, and not because they’re worried about him and his threats of knocking pple’s heads off, personally I don’t think he could knock the head off a daffodil, but there ya go.
Pple mainly backing out now because as Cath said,,,,,meets are where pple actually can put faces to the names they’ve spoken to, sometimes for a very long time, not to argue, throw toys outa prams and spit dummies.
So enjoy netty,,,,,,, :roll: :roll: :roll:
23 January, 2008 at 5:06 pm #305847@waspish wrote:
a london hairdresser who turned a muslim woman down for a job has been told she will be bankrupted to pay compensation to the muslim woman.
the hairdresser refused the muslim a job because part of her job would entail modelling new hairstyles, and also she would be expected to cut mens hair as part of her job. the muslim woman.[who has never had a job] is accusing the hairdresser of racism because she wasnt offered the job. the compensation claim has been doubled by the muslim womans solicitor because she has recieved hate mail from customers of the hairdresser. the hairdresser says she has no idea who sent the mail and doesnt condone it. however this will come of little help, as she is looking at a suit for 41 thousand pounds. the hairdresser has not got his money and will be bankrupted to pay this extortioner..
how many jobs CAN a muslim woman do ?
none that entail being in contact with males.ie nursing, home care etc
none that entail selling alcohol.
none that entail working with males ascolleagues
none that entail removing their veils.
none that entail working with non halal food.
none that entail selling religious books or materials other than thr quoran.
now i dont know about you but im willing to bet that if i took a list to the job centre demanding all of the above, and i was recieving benefit. i would have my benefit stopped immediateley. but it seems its ok for muslims to make all of these demands and STILL get benefits.
just another case of one law for them and a dozen for us the indigenous non muslims. :evil: :evil: :evil:How has it gotten to this level.
Did the jobcentre send the muslim woman for this particular job, was she prepared to do all and any of the tasks that the job entailed, (i doubt it) is she in receipt of benefit.
I just wonder how it’s gotten to this stage of the owner being possibly made bankrupt having to pay out thousands to this woman.
Surely if the muslim woman has never even had a job, then she doesn’t have the qualifications to be a hairdresser and I would have thought that this would be grounds enough to not employ her. I don’t think a customer would be too happy to have his/her hair cut by someone not qualified to do so, I know I wouldn’t. So I don’t really understand how she could have gotten to the point of possibly being out of business and bankrupt.
15 January, 2008 at 9:54 pm #304341@chickenman wrote:
Yep i’m all for it. In my experiance 19 days for police to respond to a 999 call thats all i got to say. Don’t bother with em and sort things out yourself :twisted:
2 weeks for me,,,,,,,so in future i’ll do the same as you CM and deal with it myself,,,,,,or at least some nice big burly builders will deal with it for me anyway,,,,,,sick of the police and their pathetic excuses :roll:
14 January, 2008 at 8:02 pm #304169@chickenman wrote:
I admire anyone who donates, and I think it’s great that people do but I’m sick n tired of this government telling us what to do all the time. We have got brains, well most of us have so we can make our own mind up. I would hate to think that some pedo or rapist would benefit from me giving a organ. I think more people would carry a card if they could have more say who get’s yet bits n pieces.
Thats never going to happen tho CM
No one is ‘telling’ anyone to do it. There is tho, a grave shortage of donors and people dying for the lack of them. The government is just trying to find a way to create more. I don’t see anyone demanding that people have! to comply
14 January, 2008 at 7:47 pm #304166@chess wrote:
thats a very valid point anita …… tho who knows how that would fare with the government we have. As bad as rich folk going elsewhere to *buy organs*
Agrees too :wink:
14 January, 2008 at 7:05 pm #304162I’m with you on that one Chess, I don’t think anyone should be made to choose, or be pressurised, it’s a personal choice. I do though, think that having made that personal choice, others shouldn’t be allowed to overturn it.
Understand too Sharon, who would want to have to make that decision, god forbid. I do know tho, and knowing my son as I do, I wouldn’t, I couldn’t. We discussed it, he said if anything happened to him he would want his wishes to donate his organs to go ahead.
Maybe some kind of clause in the whole process might be better. Talking to relatives about this after the person has died, asking for permission etc., Perhaps a clause by the donor themselves, that no one can turn around their decision or change it. Takes a lot of pressure away from the doctors, and heartbreaking decisions from the relatives.
14 January, 2008 at 5:47 pm #303604Just to add Sarah, Pink and I were talking in the room earlier, 40’s room. Yes we were saying that others seem to do worse, carry on and on and on and still there, and yes i’m talking about Yukon as a prime example.
Yukon was silenced earlier and couldn’t say anything, but it was a question that Pink and myself did put,,,,,why wasn’t he banned also.
As PB said, Netty has been asked now several times, to stop, but does he, no! so he really had no one to blame but himself.
-
AuthorPosts
