[Cas]

@ubermik wrote:

@cas wrote:

Are you homophobic uber?

Well two points, firstly is ANYONE a “homophobe”? The word phobe, and phobic reactions are the “irrational fear” of something, so homophobia, which is an academic construct means the irrational fear of homosexuals

Do you know or have you ever met anyone who is “scared” of them? Many people find what they do disgusting the same way many find doggy fiddling, sadomasochism, rape, paedophilia, sheep shagging, swinging, severe bondage and many other forms of non “normal” sexual activities disgusting

So if you “dislike” any of those things does that mean you are ALSO “scared” of them? Are people rapistaphobics? Paedophileaphobics? Swingeraphobics?

So the term itself is a ludicrous one, chosen and employed to discourage anyone from talking about gays in anyway bar a fluffy homoworshipping way for fear of being called a homophobe. But for that fear to have any value the person has to be retarded enough to a) buy into the validity of the term to begin with and b) give a toss what a bunch of PC homoworshippers think in the slightest (if you can call blindly and without question following PC nonsense “thinking” at all of course)

and yet more dislike them, or what they do because of social moralities or religious morality, and then there are people who just dislike SOME gays because of their demeanour like the butch bull dykes and the minicing gays

So rather than being a “phobia” its, in most cases seemingly just a “dislike”

Anyhoo gramatics aside, why ask that anyway Cas? Do you see any discussion about gays that isnt worshipping their “gayness” and putting them on some homopedastal as “homophobic” then?

Do you think they, as a sub set of society are in someway above being discussed in anyway that isnt talking about their super fabulousness?

Do you think that whether or not a child being raised by gay parents has negative effects on that child it should simply be ignored and overlooked, never investigated simply because under PC directives gays are a protected species that are wanted to be above scrutiny of anykind?

Are you infact a “homo hugging gay worshipper” then? As that would seem a reasonable and equally oppositely nonsensical thing to ask seeing as you cant seem to grasp why anyone except a homophobe would discuss homosexuals in anything less than a bum lickey tone of utter adoration?

Actually, as a bit of irony, the people who want to talk about gays the most are infact the gays themselves, so working from your “logic” (I use the word very loosely) are all gays therefore homophobic?

And what about when people discuss things to do with hetrosexuals? Do you then quiz them as to whether they are hetrophobic?

If you cant grasp the concept of the thread, dont want to actually join in disussing the topic or arent quite “equiped” to discuss an intelligible topic that pertains to gays why not just say that instead of trying to hide the fact with such a moronic question?

Are you infact a “homo hugging gay worshipper” then?

Errrr no. :roll:

Iv’e been shot down in flames for my opinions on gays adopting children before. It remains the same though. I think that they put their own needs, way above those of the child, or children in question, and I think that’s wrong.

It’s ok to say a child just needs to be loved and it’s in some ways true. A child also tho, doesn’t need to go through school, being villified by the school bully, cos every school has one :roll: because they have two dads.

I’m not saying by that, that they make bad parents, I just feel that they’re selfish parents, who, as I said, are thinking about themselves more.

[Cas]

@sweetass wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@Mrs Clean wrote:

Children need to be loved, and as long as they have a secure and loving home, does it really matter?

I’m sure a lot of alcoholics and drug users “love” their kids wholeheartedly, so is love alone going to give their kids a good stable balanced start in life?

If not then yeah, course its important as we dont know what, if any negatives could be associated with being raised in a same sex enviroment and its not “PC” for anyone to try and find out at the moment

Thats a crock of shyte for a start .. if alco’s and junkies loved their kids, they wouldnt be either in the first place … stuff the pc friendly chat of them being diseased or its an illness… both know what they’re doing before they stick that filth in their veins or drink so much they cant’t function without it …… most drunks and junkies would sell their kids for the next high …… and thats personal experience talking having watched cousins and ex friends doing it …….. :twisted: :twisted:

Well said Sweet……..and not to mention their own mothers too, some of em. :roll:

I’m sick to the back teeth of the PC brigade wanting us all to feel sorry for them too, as you said, they know what they’re doing, no one there forcing a needle into their arm, they make a choice!! so live with it!! don’t expect the rest of the world to feel sorry for ya and listen to yr never ending cracked recording of what a piss poor life you had :twisted:

[Cas]

Are you homophobic uber?

[Cas]

@Bad Manners wrote:

To belittle them and pour scorn on them every chance ya’ll have had. To make their visits to further the search for their Daughter into some sort of happy joy ride.
To continually pour scorn on every single thing they do. To judge their facial movements, and to try to be the judge of when theyre not showing enough emotion for your liking. Shameful.

What would you do BM, would you go have an audience with the pope, leave yr remaining two children in the care of others, when you’d just lost one?????

[Cas]

I would so like someone to tell me where the ”mistake” was made here. Leaving 3 small children alone, as they did, is not! a ‘mistake’,,,,,,,more a deliberate act!.

As for the statement of, they will pay for this for the rest of their lives. Well hasn’t Maddie then!!! :twisted: Where are all the sentiments from those of you who think were mocking, and have arrogant smiles. From what i’m reading, your particular sentiments seem to be with the parents! when is one of you going to have any sentiment for that child. Who, lets face it, is the ultimate victim here. Victim of her parents selfish negligence.

I think the McCanns ought to take a look at Rhys’s parents, because thats real greif!! not a painted on greif for the camera’s…

Sorry rant over :)

[Cas]

@fastcars wrote:

My sentiments entirely. =D> =D> =D>

And I honestly hope they are proved to be innocent. Not so much for them. But so that I can watch the that have had it in for them since day one.[/color]

If you think anyone who’s made comments on this are wearing arrogant smug smiles, then your even more small minded than I had you down for in the first place. :roll:

I think most people here would want that child to be found alive, but it’s looking more and more unlikely.

BTW it’s not a MISTAKE!!,,,,,,,,a mistake is not doing something you meant to do, an error in paperwork etc., leaving 3 small children alone, is not a mistake!!!

[Cas]

@fastcars wrote:

And I guess if your child went missing you would have a smile the size of Australia wouldnt you…. :?: :D

Personally Fasty, I wouldn’t,,,,,,,,,,,I don’t think my make up would be as perfectly applied and Mrs McCanns either :roll:

[Cas]

Apart from the obvious, what made me angry too about that story is that he was seen by a different doctor every time he was taken to hospital!!!!

WTF!!!! shouldn’t heads roll there too!,,,,,,,,,,why the f uck didn’t somebody do something, injuries like this little ones don’t happen overnight.

As for her! Well there’s gonna be a few nice women inside to give her a really nice welcome, (oh i do so hope so) :-

[Cas]

Good luck Arkle sweetie

be thinking of ya mwahhhhhhhh :)

[Cas]

Appears from the news that Mrs McCann is being interviewed by the police this afternoon, alone,,,,and Mr McCann is to be interviewed in the morning,,,,,also, alone. Interesting

[Author]

Posts