Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 2,261 through 2,270 (of 5,272 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #323073

    @argyll wrote:

    sok sharon…the midget cannae reach :wink:

    8-[ 8-[ 8-[ your’e soooooo gonna get it……….. :wink:

    #322537

    @dead_on_arrvial wrote:

    I can see the “throught police” are out in force again……………

    What we are dealing with here some person who never grow up.

    From what I can see on the news, its 120 pictures on a computer, not thousands.

    None of the kids in the house are in them, which is suprizing if he was an active paedophile.

    I am sure that if he had a “history” of being a paedophile one or more of the “newspapers” would have found out weeks ago.

    What we do know is he’s a “bit thick”

    So that is why I am qustioning this so much.

    But back to the “throught police”………

    If you see a picture of a car crash where people have died, do you crash your car?

    If you see a picture of war, do you start one?

    If you see a picture of a peodophile, does it mean you will become one?

    We can’t arrest people for looking at picture or what they dream of doing, only there actions. There is a big different between taking part and watching or most of us would be in court for speeding and the roads would be empty.

    I think the law on viewing and downloading anything from the web is an a ss.

    Depending on what you view, you can be arrested for anything from terroism to being a paedophile or anything else our great British people are told to fear by the media.

    you really have excelled yourself doa how can you compare a car crash with paedophillia ffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! to look at child p orn is as bad as committing the act as someone said in an earlier post the child has been abused to get those photos!!!!!!!!! i stand by my original post doa you are one worrying sicko!!!!! you are reaching a new low, and if this sort of post of yours is done just to generate a reaction to you well its worked and your even sicker than i thought!!!!!!

    #322532

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @(f)politics? wrote:

    I hardly see the connection with hitting a child and child por nography, but i do agree if he had child po rn on his comp then those poor kids had to have been put through some serious sh!t to get the images and ok so it doesnt necessarily mean he would go out and do these things but in looking at these images he is condoning others abusing kids, so lock the fecker up for that alone.

    I think that it is fair to say that adults who are prepared to find these pictures in the first place …. and then download then and save them to their hard disks are clearly utterly despicable – to put it mildly.

    No ”normal” person would want to even glance at such pictures … much less download quantities of them and save them – presumably for repeat viewing. I suspect that 99% oof the population would be utterly disgusted and appalled at this sort of thing.

    The allegation is that this unsavoury individual had hundreds of such pictures on his computer, whilst living in a home with young children present, and this surely MUST present a clear and present danger to their safety and wellbeing.

    it does pb i agree and what people dont realise there is little or nothing that will take away the horrors of childhood abuse from that child whereas authority seems to spend all their time rehabilitating offenders…….. lock em up throw away the key…… job done!!!

    #322525

    @*Sian wrote:

    @dead_on_arrvial wrote:

    Well cath I think there a big differents between down loading pictures and the dirty sods that hang around in chatrooms looking for kids to “meet “ .

    Actvily seeking out children for s ex is far worst than looking at a few pictures.

    If we was to start banning all pictures of naked chilren we would have to close down most of our churchs and make a few changes to our grave yards.

    PB is right about removing files from your computers, its not simple, that’s why you always have to take out your hard drive on your computer before you throw it always and smash it up with a hammer.

    But I still can’t understand why Craig Meehan just didn’t do more to cover this tracts once the police were involed. No one is that dumb, the police don’t just pop round in 5 mins after a child has gone missing and go thru the house, he had plenty of time to removed anything that shouldn’t have been on this computer.

    Has for Miss Matthews, she is just one of the many people in life who spend their days doing nothing and living off the state.

    I know PB may find this hard to beleave, but there are many people like Miss Mattews using this site, picking up with younger men and doing the same thing.

    “Attractive is something we don’t do, easy and drunk we do well.”

    Is Craig Meehan a victim of this plot too? Why did a 17 year old move into a house with a women twice this age?

    I have a nasty feeling this case is far from over and we will see more family members being arrested soon, my money is on Miss Matthews.


    There isn’t any difference between them!!!! Children have to be subjected to abuse to provide those pictures! I have never heard anything so fucked up in my life!! FUCKNUT!!!

    =D> =D> =D> =D>

    #322513

    for shannons sake , I hope she is kept in care and found some loving family to look after her

    #322263

    hey rose have a great birthday this is just for you :wink:

    #322275

    ok guys n gals who fell for it??? eh??? yup i did :oops: :oops: :lol:

    however one interesting point i noticed in the chat room this morning, a lot of the guys were saying the boards were closed down whilst the women were saying no its an april fool!!! now this leads me to the conclusion that when it said for further information here, women were the only ones who looked , or certainly the women who were on this morning……. whereas the guys seemed to have looked at the message , and just accepted it? :wink:

    anway martin n pb ………. nice one guys lol :D :wink:

    #321592

    dunt do scary films ……. :wink:

    #321466

    @sharongooner wrote:

    He did, but that brimming smile said it all :lol:

    didnt he just have the biggest smile? lol

    #321464

    @sharongooner wrote:

    Great win… they so deserve it. Nice one! :lol:

    this is why we love the beautiful game. You celebrating caff? 8)

    absolutely sharon lol…….. i used to look after some of the mk dons academy boys and they were alway such a nice bunch of lads, and pete winkleman and his wife bernie are just the best …… pete’s worked sooooooo hard to get things where they are including the fab new stadium within earshot of where i live lol……….. i had to laugh at pete winkleman in a tie today lol even tho he still looked a scruffy git…….

Viewing 10 posts - 2,261 through 2,270 (of 5,272 total)