Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@sharongooner wrote:
I only heard in the last few days that this was the same every night they were there. They were leaving the children alone each night.
So to me that could possibly back up the theory about them being “watched” by a paedo/kidnapper.
Im starting to feel we will never ever get to the truth of this matter which is sad for all the people involved, most of all Maddie.
Im unsure about all the time differences, seems to depend on what you read as to what time is unaccounted for.
unfortunately sharon i think you are right, we are never gonna get the truth of what happened, evryone has their theory.
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
Un like you I am a realest.
Everyone feel this sentence is too short and unfair, but feel its not.
Of course down loading or view child p o r n is wrong and the police and courts do prosecute people for it.
But there has to be some kind of prospective, we can’t lock people up for years for minor crimes.
I can think of far worst crimes ageist children that this one, such the grandmother who use drugs and alcohol, then let a dangerous dog in the house because it was “cold”, which then ripped a 5 year girl old apart.
How many years did she get?
I don’t hear you all moaning about that one.
Have we all forgotten about the high number of children kill around due the high demand for organs in the west?
What about the “Torso in the Thames “ a few years back where some immigrates imported a child from Africa for human sacrifice?
Child abuse is an emotional subject, but the law is a cold-hearted beast.
10 months in prison is a very long time for first time offenders, I think sending him to prison to mix with the hard core paedophiles was a mistake.
he is evry bit as bad as them so forgive me if i dont shed a tear or two, he got some sort of perverse pleasure out of watching small children being sexually abused,,,,,,, in the words of the immortal tommy ‘hang em, hang em high’!!!!
1. No looking at child porn doesnt necessarily mean that they will actually go out and molest a child, the child they are looking at has already been sexually abused and molested.
2. So once branded a paeodphile always a paedophile? ruins their lives. OMG forgive me while i throw up
3. DOA , how do you know that trying to get into child porn sites is so difficult, that is really a worrying fact, you have reached a new low DOA
DOA i realise you have contributed to this thread to get a reaction and yes you sure did get one, but apart from the fact that these people who ‘look’ at child porn, molest a child and get a few years in jail and may have their character tarnished for the rest of their lives, did you ever think about the ‘survivors’ of child sexual abuse, they live with it day in and day out.
Again and again we hear about paedophiles being rehabilitated, what we can do about it, how we must rehabilitate them, perhaps even chemical castration. I don’t know what the answer is for these people, but what I do know is that pound for pound there is an unbalance somewhere, how much is spent on rehabilitating offenders and how much is spent on support for ‘victim’?
Victims of child sex abuse live with it everyday of their lives. Some don’t make it, for some the horrors are too much, and are unable to stop the flashbacks, they become too much to bear, so much so the horrors can only be erased by death.
Some carry on living regardless, a twilight existence, dipping in and out of the horrors, living in a world of tranquilisers to help dull the pain, the pain that is unbearable at times, the inability to function, the inability to understand why at the time of their lives when they should have been protected and loved it went so horribly wrong.
Some live a lie, some of them are determined that they wouldn’t let anything like that happen to their kids, over compensate, love their children and become over protective. Worrying about every move they make, and yet because of years of cover up and abuse are very good at not showing their feelings, not showing how much they just want to be loved, not showing the pain that exists, the sorrow that is so deep rooted it will never go away. Some of them spend their whole lives looking for that lost love, that love and protection that as children they needed, they never feel totally safe, they never really ever trust fully.
The powers that be need to look at sentences for sexual abusers, for paedophiles, for the perverts who build databases of abused children for the delight and sexual pleasure of others. The comment I listened to recently about another paedophile for instance: and I quote: ‘he had over 75,000 images of children being sexually abused; he has been jailed and will remain there until he is no longer a danger to the public. Just what does that mean, does it mean that thousands of pounds will be spent on his rehabilitation? Does it mean he may one day become clever enough to convince the powers that be he is sorry, he is so appalled at his actions he will never do it again??
Society needs to demand that child abusers are never released, society needs to realise that for every abuser or paedophile that is ‘rehabilitated’ that there is probably a thousand children who have been abused that live with it for life.
Who is going to rehabilitate the ‘survivors’ of sexual abuse? Who is going to take away their pain? Who is going to give them their childhood back?
nuff sed!
@sunny wrote:
My puppies have got rabies and have been put down lol 8-[
pmsl suns xxx shakes me pom poms @ suns lol xxx x hugs u xxx
@yukon wrote:
I would ask that the women of 40 Something Chat post a naked and provocative picture of herself so that we men can evaluate each of you in an objective manner.
Once the pictures are posted I will determine the top three and a poll will be posted for 10 days for voting. The winner will be crowned Miss Naked 40 Something.
Come on babes start posting, post for the YUKON MAN, don’t be :oops: shy :oops: ………………………
tiptoes out of the way to avoid the stamped of 40 something ladies wanting to post their nekkid pictures………
=D> =D> =D>
another sucess this month mel. i soooo look forward to your ‘tongue in cheek’ look at life xx keep em coming xxx
@Bad Manners wrote:
You obviously know the layout of the Resturant and Apartment Complex then Cath?
How long do you reckon it should have taken her then with your detailed knowledge of the Locale?
hey bm just going on whats already reported, i dont condemm nor do i yet have any opinion on guilty or not guilty, its just some of it doesnt seem to add up, its already been said that the complex was a little more than ‘5mins’ away to walk to , like i said just looking at whats been said already and asking a question xx
10.00pm – Kate McCann leaves the bar to visit the apartment.
10.14pm – Kate McCann rushes into the bar shouting “They’ve taken her, they’ve taken her.”
PB does that mean she got there an back in 14 minutes? not a long time is it? now im beginning to wonder bout that, how does someone walk to the apartment, check the kids, run around to look where maddie had gone AND get back to the restaraunt in that time? hmmmmmm
a few years ago my mum in law was flooded in wales, it was an absolute nightmare for her. she spent the night it happened in a hotel in her wet clothes all night!!! she wasnt that mobile and had to wait for someone to ‘rescue’ her so was actually standing in water up to her waist by the time they got to her.
she spent the next 18 months being shoved around various bed and breakfast establishments, some with as many as 3 flights of stairs, and then when the council finally got there act together she had to live in a portokabin type dwelling.
My mum in law was insureed but recieved no other help, fortunately now she is settled again in her council maisonette.
As far as having no contents insurance is concerned, if you are out of work or on benefit thats the last thing people think about, there are usually other priorities to think about.
