[dead_on_arrvial]

Well Pebbles this whole story smells fishyer than cath55 knicks.

There is something wrong with this case, from beginning to end its been a Salem witch hunt.

The missing girl was not abused

None of the other kids in the family have been abused

But still social services have been busy taking kids into care, were their at more risk from long term paedophiles than at home.

So someone better tell me what is really going on here.

Do we fear paedophiles we are now seeing them everywhere?

Are we going to burn all art work from the 8-20 centurys dew to the fact they contain “indecent images of children”?

Is it time to cover up any pictures of the baby Jesus because he is naked or being kissed by a man?

Is it ok for a picture of naked child being chain up and draged in a church, but not being view on a web site?

The law makes no differents between them, a picture of a naked child is a picture of a naked child.

Most of you need to have a good long look at some of your kids pictures, most could be classed has “indecent inages of children” by the police and courts.

Now back to the car crash, more children are killed or hurt on the roads than by paedophiles, but most people think speeding is ok.

So what is worst? A child being abused for 10 years by a paedophile or a speeding car putting a child in a wheel chair for life?

[dead_on_arrvial]

Cath can’t see the different between “commiting an crimal act” and “observing one”

No wonder people can’t understand how the courts work.

All p orn sites are the same, there not free or cheap and you need a credit card to use them.

Child p orn sites are not easy to find and not free, so how someone so young, on benfits, can afford to use them and have the skill to find them is questionable.

I think we need to think about what could seen has child p orn.

Lets say there is a man changing a nappy on a baby, if you took pictures and was selective about them, you could make them look like child po rn.

Or maybe a farther giving this teenager son a hug, could be seen has gay child p orn too.

Without seening these pictures its hard to know what was download and when.

But most of these “nuts” who like child p orn have collects running into thousands and locking this man away with others like him would only increase his contacts and access to more child po rn.

I feel sure that if this young man was a peodphile, had access to children in the home, he would have increase his collection using the children in the family unit and would have taken full advantage of the familys trust.

This doesn’t seem to have happden.

I get the feeling there is something wrong with this case, it fills me with a sence of unease.

Just for cath………………

If you know anything about computers, you can put anything you like on someone elses computer without them knowing, its simple to do.

So if I place pictures of pro al-Qaeda terrorist, plans of the local airport and then removed them, called the police, told them you was plaining on blowing up the local airport and all the information was on your computer.

The police would then arrest you and you would do about 5 years for planning a terrorist act.

But would you be a terrorist? Did you kill anyone?

There are a lot of subjects that are on the web, you have the right to chose what you see for now but the moment we start locking people up for viewing some picture on a web site, we turn into China.

[dead_on_arrvial]

I can see the “throught police” are out in force again……………

What we are dealing with here some person who never grow up.

From what I can see on the news, its 120 pictures on a computer, not thousands.

None of the kids in the house are in them, which is suprizing if he was an active paedophile.

I am sure that if he had a “history” of being a paedophile one or more of the “newspapers” would have found out weeks ago.

What we do know is he’s a “bit thick”

So that is why I am qustioning this so much.

But back to the “throught police”………

If you see a picture of a car crash where people have died, do you crash your car?

If you see a picture of war, do you start one?

If you see a picture of a peodophile, does it mean you will become one?

We can’t arrest people for looking at picture or what they dream of doing, only there actions. There is a big different between taking part and watching or most of us would be in court for speeding and the roads would be empty.

I think the law on viewing and downloading anything from the web is an a ss.

Depending on what you view, you can be arrested for anything from terroism to being a paedophile or anything else our great British people are told to fear by the media.

[dead_on_arrvial]

Well cath I think there a big differents between down loading pictures and the dirty sods that hang around in chatrooms looking for kids to “meet “ .

Actvily seeking out children for s ex is far worst than looking at a few pictures.

If we was to start banning all pictures of naked chilren we would have to close down most of our churchs and make a few changes to our grave yards.

PB is right about removing files from your computers, its not simple, that’s why you always have to take out your hard drive on your computer before you throw it always and smash it up with a hammer.

But I still can’t understand why Craig Meehan just didn’t do more to cover this tracts once the police were involed. No one is that dumb, the police don’t just pop round in 5 mins after a child has gone missing and go thru the house, he had plenty of time to removed anything that shouldn’t have been on this computer.

Has for Miss Matthews, she is just one of the many people in life who spend their days doing nothing and living off the state.

I know PB may find this hard to beleave, but there are many people like Miss Mattews using this site, picking up with younger men and doing the same thing.

“Attractive is something we don’t do, easy and drunk we do well.”

Is Craig Meehan a victim of this plot too? Why did a 17 year old move into a house with a women twice this age?

I have a nasty feeling this case is far from over and we will see more family members being arrested soon, my money is on Miss Matthews.

[dead_on_arrvial]

Well its simple, I was getting naked on my c am and the only way she could get me to pop my cloths back on was to talk real drity in m s n.

I then posted this to my p orn site for the bilnd, ( yes I do care about them……… and there £30 per month sub’s).

Now you can all hear mims talking real down and drity too !!!!!!!!!

LINK DEL BY ADMIN

[dead_on_arrvial]

I think most of you have got this wrong.

And you all need a good hard think about it.

First we don’t know how long he has live there for.

We don’t know how much contact he had with the famliy before the start of this case.

He is only just 22.

We don’t know how he got the computer, looking at them, I would say it was a second hand computer that could have been given to him by a famliy member or friend.

I can’t see him having the money for the “latest thing”.

Given the amount of police interest in this case, I’m sure anyone in there right mind would have removed any such pictures or video from thier personal computer.

What we do know is that none of the pictures are of the family.

Given that the police and press did have a close look at him in the last few months and his age, i think this is a case of a second hand computer with a trace of child p orn files.

As for the child still being in the care of the state, without knowing the family history its hard too tell. Their may be other children from this family already in care.

From what I have seen its normal for teenage runaways to be placed in care if they leave the family home more than 3 times in a year.

But without knowing the family history, its hard too tell.

[dead_on_arrvial]

nice to see I’m on the list 5 times.

[dead_on_arrvial]

I can tell some of you have never been woke up by them at 3am.

The fox is a nasty little fooker who thinks eating, sh1ting and being a pain in the a ss all nite is funny, its not.

I’ve seen them eating donner kebas, screaming and getting drunk too.

The sods have work out that tables outside bars or pubs are “sources of water” and offden steal pints of beer or packets of crisps.

They are getting worst and they all need shooting.

[dead_on_arrvial]

Look its not funny, have you seen the size of these things?

There not nice little pigs, there 100+ kg hairy nasty pigs, I saw one last week at 4am.

[dead_on_arrvial]

Its going to get worst, there are reports of “wilde boar” being seen here, eating out of bins and having sex on the beach.

I can’t wait for the foxies and boars scraping on the beach.

[Author]

Posts