[dead_on_arrvial]

Oh she is dieing now………. That £50 in the poor box did the trick.

Hmmmmmmmm……………..

I have seen this before and I know what it is.

Should I tell her…………………………………?

[dead_on_arrvial]

Hi I am doa……..

You’re a fat kunt, you’re a fat kunt….

You’re a lard a ss

You smell of cat’s p i s s

You’re a council house scum

What a bunch of wasters.

(Gets back in BMW and drives off at 130 miles per hour with the windows wide open to get the smell of fat losers off cloths)

(In bats case, stays for ½ an hour, see there no chance of a shagg , gets back in “car” whines up the rubber band and drives off at 4 miles per hour).

[dead_on_arrvial]

I would help………

But I am not that bord yet.

[dead_on_arrvial]

I think this cow should have been ban about 2 years ago.

All her posts are the same.

Like most full time losers, its never her fault her life is so sh1t, its always the immigrants.

I feel sure that when she gets bored with the BNP and will join the “Moonies” and post endless rubbish about the “mother ship”.

She is pre brain washed, so she should fit right in.

Wait a min, where does the BNP stand on aliens from other worlds………?

[dead_on_arrvial]

Ok I will be coming to the Leeds meet.

But I don’t know where and when it is, or who the hell any of you are.

So it looks like will have to take charge it.

First I am moving it to somewhere warm.

So it looks like Majorca, it’s about £100 return.

Then 3 days in a nice hotel for 3 days, 2 star !!!!! I am sure we can get a group rate.

But I am toying with the idea of a 3-day min cruse for the same price.

There are many benefits to my plan like pricing all the troublemakers and out of work bums out of the meet.

Cheaper booze and fags, so when you all get on my tits after 10 mins I can sod off to bar and get drunk for 75p a pint.

When I sit down and work it out, after hotels, drinks and travail to Leeds, 3 days in Majorca is cheaper than 3 days in Leeds.

It may cost you more to get there, but you soon recover the cost in cheap beer and food.

[dead_on_arrvial]

The new tetra drivers are 1000 GB and above and run 3 times faster than the one you have now.

But there are some new solid slate drives coming in, and they are the same size has the tetra’s but have no moving parts.

So there better for laptops.

[dead_on_arrvial]

I have been hearing the same kind of things.

The main problem with vista was the delays.

I was about 2 years later and is not going to deal with issues like dual/quad core chips, 36GB ram, they are telling me we all will be using with 5 years and tetra drives.

The new window 7 has been in devolvement for the last 2 year and should be better than anything we have seen yet, but they did say the same about windows vista.

[dead_on_arrvial]

Its nothing to do with the tool bars, you have a malware problem, a nasty little virus on your computer doing it.

Find a good online malware program and use it

[dead_on_arrvial]

Nope I have PB’s home in address in Dorset.

[dead_on_arrvial]

Due to the operating system limitation, the actual memory size may be less than 4GB for the reservation for system usage under Windows® XP and Windows® Vista™. For Windows® XP 64-bit and Windows® Vista™ 64-bit with 64-bit CPU, there is no such limitation.

This sounds like a school home work question from the GCSE computer course.

Anyway with old operating systems like windows 95/98 and NT, the o/s would detect what kind of computer you had and how much ram.

Then the o/s would reserve 25% of the system resources for its own use until the system max out.

Eg.

On a P3 with 256 MB ram, the o/s would keep 64 MB for its own use.

On a P4 with 1000 MB ram (1gb) it would use 250 MB but the o/s max is about 128 MB so would reach its max performance level.

So the computer would feel faster to the user.

With windows xp there is the same kind of system, it detects what you have and adjusts.

With windows xp /vista 64 bit o/s, they have assume this is not necessary and the o/s is set to grab all it needs from day one. Which makes the computer seem slow if the system is underpowered.

Yes i have the all singing dancing amd dual core with 3 gig of ram and yes it will not run with a true 4 gig.Yes my M/B can take 8 gig of ram also the performance is truly chronic as dual core is made to run 64 bit progs not 32.
You can make some difference by adding a processor with a high L2cache.

And the simple answer to your question is no much.

Is it worth doing no, it’s a waste of time right now. Most software developers are using quad core computers with 4 gb of ram. Most of the new programs coming outing in the next 2 years will be design for to operate on those computers.

The reason why your computer feels slow, is a simple one, most of the programs you are running are not design for dual core but single, so you are only using one of the chips, not both.

So if you have an Intel duel core processor (2.40 GHz) you are only running at 2.4 GHz not 2.4 x 2.

Check this link
http://www.infomaticsonline.co.uk/crn/comment/2137545/faster-speeds-slow-change

Ok that statement was made in June 2005, I am not sure if you could have got hold of a dual core computer at that time.

Most of the computer press was making the same kinds of noises at the time.

[Author]

Posts