Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
26 September, 2007 at 11:06 pm #288966
What aw has forgot to say is, that with hair and heels she looks over 7 feet tall.
I just don’t understand why women have to colour their hair, pad their tits and ass and lie about there age.
Aw hubby was right to moan, making yourself look 7 foot tall was one step to far.
26 September, 2007 at 3:46 pm #288719I do hate to say this but………….
No one likes change and this was too much too soon.
I have spent most of last night in msn helping people to get into forum 1.
It should have been done slowly and trying out in forum 3 first, not the newcomer’s room.
The main troublemakers who lead this “walk out” did surprise me.
I was personally shocked to see it was that those old mingers cath56 and vampyre behind this.
Has I look round the site today, there are a few regs missing from forum 2.
Forum 3 was busy but the hard-core regs had gone.
The real test will be tonight.
And I would like to thank Martin for making my life harder; do you know how hard it is to keep 3 sites on my screen and trying to keep up with all the abuse?
25 September, 2007 at 9:30 pm #288707As I sat in 40’ room I watch people leaving the room.
It seems most of the f3 regs are not happy about the changes here and just left for an older version of this site.
We all knew there was going to be some people leaving the site, but then the hard core of 40’s room goes you know there more going on.
I don’t know if they will be back.
I do know that forum 3 is hard to get into at 10pm, but not tonight.
25 September, 2007 at 4:54 pm #288659Bat paedophiles is not a form of “mental ills”, if it were more people would have it.
Castration and solitary incarceration only gives them more time to fantasies making them more dangerous.
Your arguments are starting to worry me now.
You can’t go round gassing people; most of the people currently locked up for being paedophiles.
See:
http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/child+abuse
http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/resources-and-practice/IG00182/
You clearly have a problem, I am not sure it’s with the “paedophiles”.
People who can’t make a reasonable argument often do unreasonable things.
25 September, 2007 at 1:37 pm #288654First you have to look at the numbers first.
There are less than 200 paedophiles in our prison system of 85,000 inmates.
They’re not that common.
There are not thousands of paedophiles walking the streets preying on young children.
I can only think of 4 cases of “paedophiles” in the last 10 years.
They’re no way of stopping a random attack. We all know that.
We need a way to spotting the victims of long-term abuse.
I know its not nice, but a screening program for children starting at 4 years would be a step forward. Lets do something about those victims of physical abuse has well has sexual.
And has for the paedophiles we do catch, lets not keep them all in the same box. Keep them part and keep them too busy to think.
But we all know there no money for this.
Either we all start spending some money on our prison system and looking how we are dealing with our prisoners or keep putting up with the fear of “paedophiles”.
25 September, 2007 at 1:03 pm #288652I do wish you people would learn something about the subject before you start “cutting things off”
Paedophiles like the innocents of a child, the control of the child.
The sexual act is only a small part of it.
Once a child has lost their innocents most paedophiles lose all interests in the child and kill them for that reason. Killing of the witness always helps too.
Family members or people who work with children are the long-term abusers and often keep the abuse going until the child is 16. (Normally there is some kind of relationship between the child and the abuser.)
You’re all mad if you think doctors can remove this problem.
The only thing you can do is removed them from socially, but prisons only serve has a “meeting point” for information.
We need a better solution.
25 September, 2007 at 11:29 am #288649You’re all bloody nuts!
In the past they tried all kinds of ways to stop “homosexuals” being “homosexuals”.
These included drugs, psychiatric, electricity and operations treatments.
Clearly they all worked………..
It’s about time we all face the truth about this subject. You can’t change persons sexually.
There no medical answers to this problem.
24 September, 2007 at 6:45 pm #288227Well i have just pop into good chat and look for tommy.
He was not there, but the forum host was.
goodgirl >> did u want me ?
doa -> yes have you seen tommy?
goodgirl >> nop
doa -> what times he in?
goodgirl >> he dont use goodchat
doa -> why not?
doa -> he was running it right?
goodgirl >> coz we dont talk
doa -> ok
doa -> ta
goodgirl >> kk24 September, 2007 at 6:28 pm #288225Awww Tommy misses me.
Sorry tommy but not use bullbog for the last 2 years.
And has for your site, well do pop in, but only to see you and only has doa.
It seems some people are seeing “doa” everywhere.
23 September, 2007 at 1:02 pm #288369Dear PB
Yes I know it’s been a long time, far too long.
I don’t think we have spoken since your “little” problem with the rash.
Did the cream work?
Dearest pb you know it pains me to say this but there are a few things people have been saying about you. Has a good friend I feel it’s down to me to have to tell you about them.
We all know you that you are somewhat of a “sad person” who only is here to raised your somewhat low self-esteem by policing the just chat boards.
We all understand your life has not been too “great” and now your getting older has no chance of getting any better.
By the way we all think it’s a good idea if you start shaving your noise and ears hair more than once a week.
And that sex doll you have? Well it needs to be replaced, it starting to smell worst that you. Yes I know it’s hard for me to believe too but its true!!!!
Now some news about me, there have been some people telling nasty stories about me on your boards.
Talk about drop my tea when I saw them.
So let me tell you what’s going to happened soon
First the police are more concerned more with looking for paedophiles, terrorism and school bullying on the Internet than someone who sits in the chat room annoying the site staff.
We all understand that most of site staff has very little understanding of anything but there own sad poor little lives of moaning, moaning and moaning.
If the nice policeman comes banging on my door, they have to show me some kind of “evidence”, they must check that the “evidence” is real and valid, unlike the site.
So what does that mean?
Well before they start watching my home, they have to interview real people, yes I know its crazy, yes we all know I am has guilty has hell, but they do feel its necessary for some reason.
So there more likely to be asking the site for such silly things has peoples personal information such has home address and full contact details.
They a bit sneaky too them police, they not only look at the complaint but also those making the complaint and I am sure no one using this site has nothing to hide.
We all know this is going to be a slow process; it could take up to a year before they are ready to act, if they do.
Maybe the court action could be combined with the next just chat meet?
So you have plenty of time to think about what action I may take if these allegation are found to be bogus and untrue.
But just so you know, I have proved the site complaint system is open to abuse, the record keeping is a joke on this site, and it only took me 2 days.
I am just wondering something, if the “Just chat moron” can do that, what can someone with an IQ higher do?
Love you loads
Nasty old pervly Doa
PS: The nice Policemen are watching girls school next door, they don’t always close their curtains like we do. It seems at night you can see “things”.
-
AuthorPosts
