Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
18 March, 2007 at 4:12 pm #265036
Being in love implies that a deep connection existed, and the breakup from a lover brings inevitable deep inner turmoil. So many times a crush has been labeled love because kids want to believe and say that what they’ve felt and been through has been a big enough deal to be “love.”
I’m 47 and I haven’t found it yet. I felt like I’ve been in love with at least 536 women but in retrospect it was probably just fatuation. I’d like to be in love but I haven’t any feelings toward anyone for a loooong time. I haven’t even got my eye on anyone.
I’m starting to worry age is a hinderence to true love. I thought I was in love in with AW and how can anything match that now? The innocence is gone, people our age carry so much baggage. Once you’ve let your guard down and had your heart broken more than once, how can you avoid becoming jaded?
18 March, 2007 at 3:25 pm #265033Becky said:
I only read the first bit then realised you do all this cr@p for a reaction and its funny. All i will say regards to the thread is……yes men halp make babies but women grow them and give birth THATS what women do for men give them children. What would a woman do for you? Feck all lard ass.Its much much harder for men. Women want the most attrractive, socially competernt man availble and WILL not forefit anything else until they believe they’ve found that man. I mean they’re the ones that decide to bring children into the world so they have to be more ‘picky’ by nature to produce competent offspring. Men just look for the slimest, curviest women regradless of her social position. You could be an attractive women whos a top business client or something as lowly as a toilet cleaner but you’ll both get an equal amount of offers. The same doesn’t apply in men, his job is a large part of his ‘appeal’, his sexuality.
If you don’t have any qualities that are sexy then you quit and accpet the lower-life. The world isn’t a meritocracy, one can go and get those degree’s from top university’s but still not get anywhere as all HIRABLE decisions are made within the 16 seconds you walk into the interview room. If your ugly of looks, average or even slightly above average in terms of ability, then they will ‘put you’ on hold until a suitable candidiate is found. If they don’t find that candidate then they might recall you or just keep recruiting until they’ve found somebody they feel ‘safe’ with. The smaller the business the more picky they are about whom they hire.
It all depends on the jobs though as all have their stereotypes. Sales for example prefer taller sophisticated looking men, the same with business and commerce. So i guess height is the most important quaility for a man.
I also think the ‘indicators’ of ugliness in women are much smaller then those in men. A slim women sounds attractive on paper, but a slim man does’nt. It is just fat or masculinzed that women don’t like, for men its more about his height (too short is considered ugly), weight (too overweight or too scrawny), muscle mass, facial angles, hairlines etc etc. You could get a women of 6ft tall and one of 5ft, both would still be considered attractive by men but when its a two men that height…the 5ft footer is seen as a joke, a freak by both men and women.
A mans quality of life is merely a reflection of his genes, if an average man has to work at 110% compared to to 100% his attractive counterparts work at, then a below average looking man has to give 150% just to get noticed let alone get respected and promoted.
18 March, 2007 at 2:47 pm #264996I know what this is, seen it before.
Anyway Pb how much to buy Ugo message board account?
I am resevering this name on Fri and would like to get the message board account too.
How about a £7.50 for the both?
17 March, 2007 at 9:25 pm #264908Ugo sent me this in “private message”
ugo wrote:
You better not c0ck or when i come to Brighton to see my friend from here who knows you I`ll seek you out & destroy you for it !!!
Ok come and “destory” me lolHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaa
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
17 March, 2007 at 8:03 pm #264906Just think the name “Ugo” will soon be gone from forum 3
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWwwww
16 March, 2007 at 7:22 pm #264588You know i have to work damn hard at these posts.
I don’t see any of you posting, only moaning.
What the hell are the yanks doing on here anyway?
I bet there lost and think this place is Irqa
16 March, 2007 at 7:41 am #264621I only do it to pi ss him of and laff when he get a ban.
Its just sooooooo funny.
mmmm…. only £5 you say……….
Where my credit card he he heeeeee
14 March, 2007 at 9:14 am #264075You know I wish I had read this one first before putting it on here.
14 March, 2007 at 9:11 am #264358I know why we had to have Trident last time, the gov thought we all need more excise and it was a good way to get people out in the fresh air marching.
The moaning about it helped too.
And there were the Russians to worry about.
But now I think we should be spending money on a missiles defence system, not replacing Trident.
After all, they never used Trident.
It was a total waste of money.
Use them or loose them that’s what I say.
14 March, 2007 at 4:40 am #264089I am only “post” because I feel “emmlush” has taken over the boards.
I don’t wirte this stuff.
-
AuthorPosts