[draculina]

I don’t really understand why people are so negative about things, 2016 was the best year to be alive, pretty much everywhere in human history with very few exceptions such as North Korea.

For example, this was the maximum food you was allowed to buy per week in the UK just 70 years ago following the end of WW2.

Item			Rations (April 1945)
Bacon and ham			4 oz (113 g)
Sugar			8 oz (227 g)
Loose tea			2 oz (57 g)
Meat			1 lb 3 oz (540 g)
Cheese			2 oz (57 g)Vegetarians were allowed an extra 3 oz (85 g) cheese<sup id=”cite_ref-veg_29-0″ class=”reference”>[29]</sup>
Preserves			2 lb (0.91 kg) marmalade or 1 lb (0.45 kg) preserve or 1 lb (0.45 kg) sugar
Butter			2 oz (57 g)
Margarine			4 oz (113 g)
Lard			2 oz (57 g)
Sweets			12 oz (340 g) per month

[draculina]

Arc en wrote:

So how does registration help in this case young jack & drac ?

I said that it wouldn’t help, lol.

[draculina]

Foring people to register wouldn’t stop people from being able to clone your name, at least how it works now.

[draculina]

Pete wrote:

6…it wants me to move ffs.. what do they think it is 2017 ?

I’m only moving to get more chockies.

[draculina]

Draculina, because she’s awesome.

1 member liked this post.

sceptical guy

[draculina]

[draculina]

It kept telling me I need to lose weight, lol.

[draculina]

I don’t think I should have scored so highly.

Attachments:

1. 

   Screenshot-from-2016-12-29-223927.png

2. 

   Screenshot-from-2016-12-29-223856.png

[draculina]

SHR. wrote:

Neither do “libertarians”, they do though, agree with your views on immigration, unlike liberals, who don’t.

The anarcho-capitalist branch of libertarianism certainly does, and they seem to be the largest voting block for political groups like the US Libertarian party in my experience.

I was able to find one libertarian party in the UK, who seem to adopt a minarchist rather than an anarchist approach, but is still focused on reducing the power of government.

Liberalism is about giving universal rights and protections to the citizens of its nation, which can’t happen without government regulation of certain things. This contrasts with progressivism, which divides people into classes, and gives each of those classes seperate rights rather than to the individual people. An example of this would be funding for domestic abuse shelters, with a progressive policy domestic abuse is viewed as a female issue, so (virtually) all funding is given shelters that only accept women. Male victims of abuse are not given the same protections under this system, which I am against.

SHR. wrote:

Are you going to mess around before revealing what you are truly all about?

I don’t really understand why you think I am trying to hide some kind of secret agenda.

Edit:
I found the UK Libertarian party’s policy on immigration, there are two quotes that are relevent: “In parallel, we will establish bilateral agreements with countries to enable free flows of people” and “Longer term, and in conjunction with the shrinking of our unsustainable current Welfare System, we are committed to pursuing an open borders policy towards those who would wish to come to the United Kingdom in order to contribute to our economy and peaceful shores“.

This is pretty much the oposite of what I have proposed in this thread.

[draculina]

SHR. wrote:

A ‘libertarian’ position yes, which you deny, and deny strongly, of course you could prove me wrong, which you also deny. You are not a liberal, whatever translation, you put on it.

Libertarian is an American variation on liberalism, it is further to the right in terms of ecconomic policies. I’m not a libertarian though, I don’t think privatising transport infrastructure or law enforcement is a good idea.

[Author]

Posts