[Drivel]

It’s probably something to do with singing the National Anthem ??? – or wearing a track suit ??

[Drivel]

@forumhostpb wrote:

I don’t want to get into the whole ”healthy eating” thing here. But it seems to me that if you are living ”below the poverty line” as our Dear Leader soundbites on about, then logically it would be difficult to find enough food to eat at all, much less eat to such excess that you become obese (as defined).

It strikes me that poverty implies starvation / deprivation, not stuffing your face with so much food over a long period of time that you become like a little butterball.

So I revert to my initial point. Do we really need a ”fat Tsar” or is this simply another pointless and costly ‘initiative’ to divert our attention away from the Government’s increasingly lengthy list of incompetencies???

That’s a good point PB When we think about poverty in Victorian times – we think about starving urchins – Oliver Twist types MacDonalds never seemed to have any effect n them then .

Perhaps a good idea would be to do “Exchange trips ” with say Rwanda – or some impoverished state with starving kids Round up all our fatties – and bus them off there for 6 months – the starving kids can live here for the same 6 months and get some grub down ther necks

Good for foreign relationships too

[Drivel]

The little town I come from was once a nice quiet northern port

Then in their wisdom they decided to make it the main “needle exchange” town in north east

So what happens – the place is swamped with druggies looking for freebies – followed by pushers -then landlords looking at renting crap places to the druggies

As it escalates – burglaries , muggings , theieving , weapons etc escalate also

Shoot the bastards

[Drivel]

The only shooting gallery they need – is lining up against one of Tommy’s walls -and shot with real bullets

[Drivel]

@Mrs Clean wrote:

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

Well I’m in favour of the general idea of getting the country fitter and healthier. We should be encouraging people to eat healthier food and do more physical activity. In the long-term it’s better for them.

Absolutely agree and this is parental responsibility as far as children are concerned, but it should be integrated into their lifestyles subtly, I dont believe children at the age of 4 need to be aware of how much they weigh or what their measurements are.

As long as they are healthy – look at some rugby players – big guys – fit as feck

Will they be checking them out for sexuality at 4 now too – being gay can be a lot more dangerous than being fat

[Drivel]

FFS what a load of cack !!!!!!!

Loads of kids are fat then skinny then fat again – it’s part of growing up – when they get older they ccan decide for themselves how they want to look – it’s better being fat than bloody anorexic

[Drivel]

G is for Gut

[Drivel]

Yabadabadoo

[Drivel]

Drivel is 100% Macho male – not a gay gene anywhere

OK – GOT IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Drivel]

Lily the Pink

[Author]

Posts