emmalush

It is a fair point that the courts get it wrong. Some people have been released ten, fifteen years after they’ve served their time, and it would be tragic if they recieved the death sentence, but im not advocating they die, im saying those like huntley and the evil fuk who got 40 years, we know beyond a shadow of any doubt they are guilty should…[Read more]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

So the source of your 68% is an unknown radio presenter on some sports radio station.

Something like 5 to 6 million people tune in, very unknown…

If you think he works for the world’s best selling newspaper you’re probably wrong considering the population of the UK. It just shows how wrong your statistics are.

He said his…

[Read more]

Can anyone tell me what use either of this evil pair are to us in our society?

Huntley wont be ever able to get a job, because no one would trust him, no one would want such evil working with them, bad for business, so he’ll get a “new life”, changed appearence, which will cost us more of OUR money, that should be spent on US.

The evil terrorist…[Read more]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

So, his “hypocrisy” is to oppose the death sentence in Britain and in Iraq? Where did you get the 68% from? You probably don’t realize but you can’t be part of the EU if you have the death penalty. It’s foolish to support the death penalty.

The hypocrisy is blair wanting the kind of government in iraq that wants sadam…[Read more]

@Slayer wrote:

I LISTENED to the whole interview and whilst I am no supported of Blair, he was quite categoric in what he said and the stance of the government- the reported was a complete pr/at who continually harped on with a question because Blair wouldn’t actually use the word “yes”

Why are you looking for a cheap argument?

Did blair say he…[Read more]

His sentence was too light, he should be shot, but he got a worse sentence than that evil fuk who murdered the soham girls :roll:

Me thinks he got 40 years to gain votes for bush, cynical? ner, a realist. Him and sadam get sentenced just days before the election…

Its easy peasy fooling the general public.

@ForumHostPB wrote:

Well Emma it all depends on the ‘Twelve good men and true’ doesn’t it? If the jury believes the evidence put before them and returns a ”Guilty” verdict, then your two mates are in for several years of forced sodomy eh??? :lol:

This is my point, those present at the meeting didnt cause racial unrest of any discription, so…[Read more]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

If parents can’t cope with their kids then there should be specialist help organisations they can easily turn to to give them counselling.

What kind of help? Who decides how to be a parent?

The town hall already has your details so why not add a photo for every resident. I think it would help because it would facilitate the…

[Read more]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

Im sure your looking for an argument of blame here, but where and to whom did he say this?

It was part of the secret recording.

Not quite, that was a bbc new labour searchlight thing.

Where and to whom did he say this?

@ForumHostPB wrote:

Whether or not a person is guilty of an offence in law (on incitement) is up to the Courts to decide, after hearing any evidence.

So the question still needs an answer, did they cause racial unrest? As it cannot be proven (because it didnt happen), then they are innocent.

In this case you two mates were grassed up by the…

[Read more]

@ForumHostPB wrote:

The issue is whether or not a person expresses views which might incite others to commit criminal acts.

So what your saying is, that ANYTHING ANYONE says to someone “MIGHT” incite others to commit a criminal act. Does that make what EVERYONE says worthy of a seven year jail sentence?

@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

Why has new labour allowed such a disaster, especially when you think back to 1997, education, education, education, was that just a smoke screen for tax, tax, tax.

New Labour haven’t allowed such a disaster. Blinkered people in our society like yourself have allowed such a disaster.

How the hell is it partly my…[Read more]

@BOB2GO wrote:

So, if the BBC had taped a conversation between two muslim leaders talking about inciting muslims to rise up and start bombing people and they passed this to the police, you would be standing on the courtroom steps with placards campaigning for the case to be dropped and the BBC to be charged with incitement to cause racial…

[Read more]

@BOB2GO wrote:

This trial IS specifically about ‘Nick and Mark’ (Dumb and Dumber?). Who else has been charged? I think you’ll find that it’s a criminal charge they face and not a civil ‘class action suit’ so it is nothing to do with rights of Freedom of Speech.
So your quite happy never to give your personal opinion about something you dont…

[Read more]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

I think parents need to take more responsibility over their kids behaviour and those that can’t handle their kids should be given support.

What kind of support?

It would also help to have more police on the streets or at least PCSOs or wardens or some kind of visible deterrent.

More police yes, but new labour have taken them…

[Read more]

Im sure your looking for an argument of blame here, but where and to whom did he say this?

@PB wrote:

What do you think about it? Is it a necessary weapon in the fight against crime or an attack on your personal liberty?????.

It will only fight crime of those listed who commit offence. If one of them never commits a crime, no need holding it, its a case of presuming guilty whilst innocent, dictatorship police state.

Sadly, like poster…[Read more]

@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:

Story here.[/b]

I agree there is a problem, but i’d like to know what makes the BBC think the female in the report is under 20?

Why has new labour allowed such a disaster, especially when you think back to 1997, education, education, education, was that just a smoke screen for tax, tax, tax.

Should we do a cameron and hug a…[Read more]

Ahh the green man, are you a pagan mr bigastuff?

@ForumHostPB wrote:

Well Emma, as you must know I wasn’t there personally so I can’t directly answer your question. However, at their forthcoming trial no doubt evidence will be put before the Court as to what was said and how it broke the law on incitement.

I expect that those who really care about these two will rush up there to listen to the…

[Read more]