Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
sky have blagged a more expensive deal to the customer, giving you something for nothing or few, letting you realise its a good product, and then charge you heaps.
I think it costs pubs £300 a month to have sky sports now? Few pubs have it, but you see, their former customers have it at home now…
I think all tv is a great rip off. You can use your £20? a month internet connection and have ten times more entertainment. Of course, you still need a fascist tv licence…
You’d know :wink:
@slayer wrote:
I actually agree (god forbid) with Emma GENERAL statement. Moving a business to another area for a more “diverse” workforce doesn’t make sense and clearly is inappropriate and should be challenged (just as if the opposite were occurring)
And the BNP.
The people who they will be employing in Leicester (as Emma will testify) WERE born here, DO live here and ARE English and with that I have no problem.
Every single one will be born in England?
Had the decision been made on economic grounds (i.e they couldnt recruit or sustain a managed workforce in Corby etc) then every business has the right to re locate.
Thats the irony though slayer, Corby is a very poor town, the residents there thought they were just getting themselves on some sort of economic level playing field, what with the new shopping centre being built (yes, new one, because they have a “victorian” shopping centre), and now jobs because New Labour are anti-white racists and Corby is 93% white.
ubermik, to follow on from you, isnt it ironic when lefties point the finger at white people and call them chavs, no jobs, but another bunch of lefties take away their jobs.
Its social engineering, to bring everyone to the same level, easier to control us then.
To put this nightmare into perspective, had the jobs been taken away from asians in Leicester, and given to Corby, even for economic reasons, that would be classed as racist…
An MEP from the UKIP is under investigation for fraud after embezzling tens of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money by pretending to be someone else.
Bank documents show that Tom Wise channelled nearly £40,000 of public funds into his personal account after claiming it was for an assistant’s salary. He is now being investigated by a European antifraud watchdog, which has asked to interview him and others in connection with the case.
This is potentially the most serious crisis to hit UKIP, which has always held itself up as the party opposed to the European Union “gravy train”.
The development comes as the Electoral Commission announced it was launching a full inquiry into UKIP’s finances after its repeated failures to keep within the rules. EU rules state that MEPs can claim up to £125,000 a year for assistants’ wages but the money must be paid either directly to the employees or through a third-party “agent”. To avoid fraud, MEPs are not allowed to handle the money themselves.
Instead Wise, a former policeman, pretended that his own bank account was actually that of Lindsay Jenkins, his researcher.
From November 2004 until October 2005 he funnelled £39,100 of taxpayers’ money into his own account with the Cooperative Bank from which he paid Jenkins just £13,555, according to bank statements obtained by The Sunday Times. They show that the only money coming into the account was from the EU, ostensibly for Jenkins.
In another breach of the EU rules, some of the £13,555 paid to her was actually for work done on behalf of other party members, including the UKIP leader Nigel Farage who had agreed to fund the publication of a Eurosceptic book written by Jenkins.
During the same timespan, more than £19,000 of the money was steadily paid out from Wise’s account to other destinations, some of them apparently credit cards. One disbursement alone, made via a transfer to somebody other than Jenkins, was for £6,500.
Last night Wise refused to reveal what the money had been used for. When questioned by The Sunday Times on the ultimate destination of the cash, he went silent before putting down the telephone. He failed to respond to further messages.
Wise, 58, an MEP for Eastern England since 2004, also applied for other assistants’ salaries to be paid through his bank account before the period involving Jenkins.
Despite an internal UKIP inquiry into Wise’s behaviour, launched after the EU became aware of his scam, no action has been taken against him and the results of the investigation have been kept secret.
Three days after the EU was alerted, and to head off a scandal, Wise began repaying £25,530.
If Olaf, the antifraud watchdog, establishes fraud, the evidence will be passed to British and Belgian police for a possible prosecution.
UKIP systematically flouts the spirit of EU rules, which forbid party workers from being paid with taxpayers’ money.
The party has been paying its regional organisers by designating them “advisers” and “assistants” to its 10 MEPs, thereby allowing them to draw salaries of up to £40,000 a year from the EU, while they do their actual jobs “in their spare time”.
Further details are set to be exposed because Denis Brookes, one of the party’s former officials, issued industrial tribunal proceedings against Mike Nat-trass, the party’s MEP for the West Midlands region.
It is understood that Brookes has stated in his claim for unfair dismissal that he was being paid to do one job while actually employed to do another one entirely, so that the party could secure EU funding for him.
“Some people in the party have a cavalier and even contemptuous attitude to taking what is actually taxpayers’ money and using it for their own ends,” a UKIP source said.
Within months of his election Wise was attempting to channel public funds into his own bank account. In October 2004 he applied to the EU payments office for Jenkins, a freelance researcher as well as a candidate at the time for selection to fight a parliamentary seat for the Conservatives, to be paid £36,000 a year.
He had, however, no intention of paying her such an amount. His actual agreement with her was that she would be given monthly “retainer” payments of £500 in return for her advice and statistical research, with any additional work being paid for on top.
Wise’s method was simple. He supplied the EU payments office with a contract, obtained by The Sunday Times, which included Jenkins’s name and details and stipulated that she apparently wanted her money to be paid into her account, entitled “Stags”.
In fact, this account, the full name of which was “T Wise trading as Stags”, was a business account run by the MEP himself.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1434608.ece
It always rains on ukip headquarters. I was tempted to vote for them in 2004, i would be peeved now if i had been sucked into that nightmare party.
If i was Nigel Farage, i’d go back to trading on the Stock Market, he was good at that.
@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
I can see why you would think me a bad person Emma Braun. I advocate equality for all and human rights. I dislike racism, sexism, homophobia
No you dont, you’d prefer to see someone claim benefit, than given the chance to earn a living, prefer an alread working foreigner given the job, you’re a bad person.
“There is real hatred boiling in his mind”, this coming from someone who has said and i quote “I like being racist”, because of course that doesn’t constitute “hatred”.
Why is it hatred to believe in a specific ability of a group of people with a common feature, or, discrimination against or antagonism towards other races?
You just like to make a fool of yourself assuming.
I guess i am glad i am a bad person on looking at these lists.
You hardly know these people, only what those evil political masters of yours have taught you, their belief and spin.
@smiley wrote:
Communists are just as bad as the BNP.
Infact, the communists killed 20 million innocent people. How many people have the BNP killed?
Yeah. Thought so :wink:
The tories have killed more people than the BNP…
@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
You have constantly tried to level statements at me along the lines of “You’re neutral”
Not statements, QUESTIONS, because being neutral is your claim, and you tell me a dont read well enough for debate…
you are a racist homophobe with no capacity for reasoned debate
Nothing wrong with being a racist and homophobe. Reasoned debating is opinionated, you are a terrible debator of reason.
you do not read what has been written
I did say a few days ago you were the biggest assumpter ive ever come accross.
you as intentionally neglecting what either i am writing
Write something worth replying to then…
so instead i will mock your posts and the nonsence you paste.
Because you cannot handle it. You live in a dream world, in which you think everything and everyone revolves around what you think and do.
1. Ok……..why have they the right to call me racist?
5. This is my post…
6. Theres the difference you see. A decent person would rather be and feel safe, have criminals caught more who might hurt or steel from them, than some daft burocratic EU membership.
7. The best person for the job can be someone we train….better to train an unemployed “slayer”???
8. “my grandparents are from Pluto…and i am the retard???”. Seems so. Infact, calling you a retard is an insult to retards.
Oh it would be a pleasure watching you squirm, funding criminals expensive lifestyles, ours too, cos they’d wana live on yourside for better treatment, and you being namby pamby’s, would welcome them. Your society would crumble into a third world squalor, you only survive now because of us.
When would you like to live without the white patriotic English/british?
How will you survive without us?
