Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I bet these evil “people” get more than bread and water for what they did, justice, ner, but thats what we voted for.
I cannot understand why decent hard working tax paying good people wana fund such luxuries like hot food for these evils.
@forumhostpb wrote:
presumably for emphasis. Can you explain what the particular significance is ???
Emphasis yes. The other reason is, and i desperately hope i dont offend here, it seems to me that some people who read this site dont like long posts, so instead of reading every single word in detail, i thought be helpfull to give those the chance to flick through it and get the gist.
Suggest an alternative colour Smiley?
Under islamic law, he has a point, and thats what he means.
These “radical” islamists are going to make our society a hellhole more than it is now, not just because their belief system is alien and barbaric, but because our government leaders will use it to control us.
Its just been reported on ITV news, that French special forces had bin laden in sight, less than 400 yards, they could’ve gained audio of him, they could’ve killed him, but when asking the Americans for an all clear to do so, no reply for 2 hours.
If they had killed him, it would’ve dented alqeada severly, and it would’ve meant the war on “terror” would be almost won.
Question, was he denied death to keep the war on “terror” alive?
Are we still being “protected”, keeping bin laden alive, excuse for a police state?
Is our REAL enemy our own government?
We can ban smoking, but we cannot ban driking. Drinking causes us to be harmfull, an excuse to control us? 24 hour drinking laws…
An Islamic school is poisoning the minds of pupils with lessons in hate, a former teacher claims.
Colin Cook, 57, says textbooks used by children as young as five at the King Fahad Academy in Acton describe Jews as “repugnant” and “apes” and Christians as “pigs“.
Pupils have allegedly been heard saying they want to “kill Americans“, praising 9/11 and idolising Osama bin Laden as their “hero“.
There are fears that it could become a breeding ground for terrorists with Mr Cook warning: “The school could produce a dangerous harvest.”
Its sister school of the same name in Bonn has been singled out by the German intelligence services as a meeting place for activists linked to terrorism.
Mr Cook, a Muslim convert, taught English at the school for 19 years until he was sacked in December last year.
He claims he was fired after blowing the whistle on the school for covering up cheating by children in GCSE exams and is bringing a tribunal claim for unfair dismissal, race discrimination and victimisation.
He also alleges that when he complained to school management about the content of the curriculum and questioned whether it complied with British laws, he was told: “This is not England. It is Saudi Arabia“.
He said that the school was “very good” until the majority of British teachers left in 2005. He said: “Since then, there has been a move towards a pro-Saudi agenda.
“It is clearly racist and very divisive. I understand now why the pupils express anti-Western views at school. It is deeply immoral to put such ideas into the heads of young children.
Mr Cook’s solicitor Lawrence Davies said: “Faith schools are legitimate but they must not be used to propagate a racist agenda. Every faith school must be properly inspected. And those that promote the terrorist mindset must be called to account.”
The school denies all his allegations and claims he was rightly dismissed for misconduct. Opened in 1985 for the offspring of Saudi diplomats in London, it is named after the former Saudi king and funded by that country’s government.
But the overwhelming majority of its 750 pupils are now the children of British Muslims. The school – which teaches pupils up to the age of 18 – devotes around half of lessons to religious education and teaches almost all classes in Arabic, with boys and girls following different curriculums.
In the past, parents have claimed that the school is teaching British children fundamentalist Islam while giving girls an inferior education.
Ofsted, which inspected the school in March 2006, made a series of criticisms of its performance and refused to give it full registration as an independent school.
It warned that while the quality of teaching was good, there had been “major changes in staffing” which led to disruption, and told the school to improve the curriculum.
In papers submitted to Watford employment tribunal, Mr Cook says that most of the school’s teachers are Saudis who speak little or no English.
Mr Cook’s lessons formed part of a British curriculum while a second Saudi curriculum was taught in Arabic. Mr Cooks claims that textbooks used on the Saudi curriculum, which are published by the Saudi government’s ministry of education, prove that the academy “is institutionally racist“.
He said: “The textbooks apparently state that the Jews are cursed. Pupils are asked to ‘ mention some repugnant characteristics of Jews‘.”
Mr Cook said pupils are taught that religions including Christianity and Judaism are “worthless“. He said: “The teachers on the Saudi curriculum presumably either endorse this racist viewpoint or teach it without complaint.”
Mr Cook claims he was sacked after he reported pupils cheating to exams board Edexcel. He said that staff allowed pupils to refer to their own, heavily annotated course books during an English language GCSE exam.
He said: “The Academy knows that cheating occurred. The boys who did cheat and those who probably cheated were not investigated or sanctioned. Mr Cook was fired in December after being accused of gross misconduct.
He said: “It was unlawful to sack me for whistle-blowing in these circumstances. A Saudi national would not have been treated in this adverse manner.”
The school claims that Mr Cook was rightly dismissed for misconduct connected to the exams procedure. His tribunal is due to take place later this year.
All these stories are comming to light after years of investigations, how many are in the pipeline?
You can have multiculturalism, but you cant have peace.
You can have peace, with a firm belief system that the VAST majority adhere to.
News article filed by BNP news team
Anyone considering taking the Royal riyal in the desert state of Saudi Arabia should at least learn the basic fact of life of “when in Rome….etc”.
The oil-rich kingdom is a fundamentalist Islamic state where the religious police, despised by many Saudis enjoy extensive and unchallenged powers and is temporary home to tens of thousands of westerners mostly working in the oil and construction sectors. No allowance is made for westerners who are expected to live under the strict shariah law which native Saudis adhere to.
Now 433 foreigners including more than 240 women have been arrested for attending a party where alcoholic drinks were served and men and women danced together, both activities forbidden under Islamic law.
A Saudi Arabian court has convicted and sentenced 20 of the arrested to receive lashes and spend several months in prison.
So far the names of the foreign workers nor their nationalities have been released.
Judge Saud al-Boushi sentenced the 20 to three to four months in prison and ordered them to receive an unspecified number of lashes.The prosecutor general charged the 20 with “drinking, arranging for impudent party, mixed dancing and shooting a video for the party.”
The rest of the detainees are awaiting trial.
Wouldn’t wana be in their shoes, would you? The term, ragged, bagged and shagged springs to mind.
Someone put up the remaining fixtures for arsnic manure and chelski
Cry little sister – hemstock n jennings. Its a trance remix edit version of the theme from the lost boys film.
Tuesday, 28 November 2006 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6190080.stm
Ethnic and religious courts are gaining ground in the UK. Will this lead to different justice for different people?
Aydarus Yusuf has lived in the UK for the past 15 years, but he feels more bound by the traditional law of his country of birth – Somalia – than he does by the law of England and Wales.
“Us Somalis, wherever we are in the world, we have our own law. It’s not Islamic, it’s not religious – it’s just a cultural thing.”
The 29-year-old youth worker wants to ensure that other members of his community remain subject to the law of their ancestors too – he helps convene an unofficial Somali court, or “gar”, in south-east London.
Aydarus is not alone in this desire. A number of parallel legal universes have been quietly evolving among minority communities. As well as Somali customary law, Islamic and Jewish laws are being applied and enforced in parts of the UK.
Islamic and Jewish law remains confined to civil matters. But the BBC’s Law in Action programme has learned that the Somali court hears criminal cases too.
One of the most serious cases it has dealt with was the “trial” of a group of young men accused of stabbing a fellow Somali.
So how did this court come about? Some academic lawyers see these alternative legal systems as an inevitable – and welcome – consequence of multiculturalism.
Dr Prakash Shah, of London’s Queen Mary University, advocates this “legal pluralism”.
“Tribunals like the Somali court could be more effective than the formal legal system in maintaining social harmony.”
Mohammed Shahid Raza, a leading Islamic scholar, claims “When Britain was ruling India, there was a separate legal code for Muslims, organised and regulated by British experts of law.”
There is already a network of Sharia councils in the UK. They are not recognised as courts but are seen as essential by those Muslims seeking advice and religious sanction in matters such as divorce.
Cassandra Balchin, a convert to Islam and spokeswoman for the group Women Living Under Muslim Laws, is concerned about the growth of these minority legal systems.
Despite Ms Balchin’s fears, Sharia councils have already begun to follow the Jewish model of turning themselves into recognised courts of arbitration.
Who’s warming to the idea that multiculturalism is a nightmare?
Anyone see the programme on monday night 8pm C4?
Focused on 3 muslim men under house arrest. Found not guilty of crimes against the general public terror wise, they cannot leave their house for approximately 15 hours a day. Can only travel upto 1 mile from their home, amazingly one of them can use 3 tube stations.
Point is, the government see them as a “threat”, whether they are or not, the government dont know.
Police state.
