Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Absolutely slayer.
Im puzzled, what do you mean by positive discrimination? Discrimination is positive full stop isnt it?
positive discrimination is a spin word for favouring a particular section of society to ensure there voice has a representation i.e. the use of all women candidates lists for constituency elections ensures women have a more representative voice in parliament which otherwise would not have been heard
I thought you might say that. So you think it would be better for you to be represented in Parliament by someone less qualified to do the job, possibly not qualified, just because they were born with a virgina and breasts…
You can understand why i think your political and social views are sometimes pathetic…
Absolutely slayer.
Im puzzled, what do you mean by positive discrimination? Discrimination is positive full stop isnt it?
@slayer wrote:
No Emma- he’s just one who see’s all the truth not just some of the truth- and the fact that you continually defend criminality and criminal actions
I was under the impression you were defending criminality and only saw some truth that suited you? I dont have any proof of it, but i dont need it do i…
@forumhostpb wrote:
The ”why” really is irrelevant.
Why? I put it to you, that you might find in your detective work, that there maybe reasonable reasons why it wasn’t payed, and that the “crime” and/or “bad” that you express as a sufficent detail of polution to the minds of the great un political washed who crave to accompany you on these boards, is wasted. I’ll leave that for you to search, you go use your pittifull 2MB connection now, go along, run on, then come back, come back with a educated response, make us aware of your sorrow that forth become you.
Quite frankly it is entirely their own fault if they fail to pay their bills. I expect that they are far too busy rushing around from political meeting to political meeting, in between beating up women and starring in porn films.
I can find you a magistrate to fullfill your statement underoath if you like?
Still no threads of political criminality of exposure about the old gang i see.
Are you a BNP member trying to expose the old gang from me, or just a spitefull tw@?
@forumhostpb wrote:
Not a chance Emma – in any event Manuel says ”Que???” and is hilariously funny.
Hilariously funny?
Geoff, manwell made me laugh alot, the English have a way of doing that, pretending to be a foreigner and larking around.
The PC brigade at 10 downing street would say its racist :D
@tadpole wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
The reason this law isnt abolished, and the reason people have anti-white racist problems expressed above, is because our rulers want to implement a marxist style communistic state, everyone equal – everyone the same.
So if your white and/or hetrosexual and/or fairly well of, basicly different to the cultural new comers to this countries society, then expect to be treated unfairly.
Never a truer word spoken. I wont go into detail, but i have recently had a personal experience where racism against white people is rife! But apparently there is no such thing as racism towards white people. Same old story…….if a black/asian lad gets beaten by a group of white lads, its a racist attack! A white lad gets beaten by black/asian lads its assault!
Trust me this country is going to the dogs and its no wonder ppl are moving abroad to get awy from this Hot Chocolate. Our country is so greedy it will let anybody in and whilst allowing this the country neglects its own! Didnt Enoch Powel warn us this would happen. But in good old fashion greed the government knows best!
The old gang parties see it like this, if they let in people who really want and need to come here, then there more likely to vote for the party that lets em in.
The prodomanent people’s of England need to wake up fast, because like you mention, Enoch will be proved right albeit 25 years later than first thought.
What will it take for them to wake up, a 50-50 bablance?
mr bigastuff, the BNP do want harmony, segregation will provide that, because integration causes disharmony. Unity is something that works in ones mind, we are different people, we dont all think along the same unity lines.
Voting for the old gang multiculturalists, creates diverse harm. You welcome harm.
We dont have to go to work to feed the worlds poor, and we certainly dont have to go to work to allow the worlds poor to live off our backs. If you wana help the worlds poor, do it off your own back, and stop being ignorant by fascistly saying everyone should help.
I think many that voted new labour did so on the basis that £7.5 billion of tax payers money would be sent to africa. Seems like folk need to learn the hard way.
@forumhostpb wrote:
Emma dearest, it’s all very well banging on and on about Tony’s war in Iraq etc etc but I cannot see that this addresses my issue.
You are suggesting that the BNP are bad because 5-10 or so of them have commited a crime, so im saying to you, that hundreds of new labour and conservative MP’s, and maybe even other political supporters are ATLEAST bad for war crimes.
Which is worse, which is more bad? Put your argument into context…
The so-called morality of the war being waged in Iraq and elsewhere does not imply that the Prime Minister (or indeed any of the Government) have been convicted in the criminal courst or the civil courts
Technicly not convicted, because the convictors in our society are those who should be convicted, you work it out…
Unless the BNP cleans up its act by removing such people from its membership (or at least withdrawing support from them) then nobody is going to take it seriously as a viable altewrnative political party.
The BNP’s criminal acts, are miniscule in comparison with the people who run our country and society. WELL DONE for exposing the gold fish, now go after the sharks?
Instead they will simply write off its policies as the mouthings of a few malcontents and trouble makers.
So you think their policies are good, just written by bad people?
Since it would appear from previous posts on the subject, a number of BNP Councillors have failed to pay even their rent, do you suppose that they will have paid their Council Tax???
Why couldn’t they pay their rent and/or council tax?
After all if they haven’t, then they will hardly be able to fully carry out their duties and represent the people that voted for them.
Who’s fault is that?
@forumhostpb wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
It’s astonishing that you think you ‘re a victim of racial discrimination
Whats wrong with being a victim of racial discrimination? I would’ve thought it nice that someone understands the difference between one thing or another, or understands good racial taste?
Er…. forgive me for appearing to be a complete ignoramus in these mattters Emma dear, but what on earth is “good racial taste” ?????
Anyone that understands the good in the races that i belong to, has good taste. It is great to discriminate on racial grounds, it is great to discriminate.
Geoff, to be fair mate, if the “likes” of the BNP gain from the mess created by the old gang, that is not their “fault”.
You are certainly not racist for mentioning it, you are a realist, and we need more folk like you saying these things. Maybe if millions did, the BNP wouldn’t exist?
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
It will probably come as a surprise to the Malaysian government to find out that there was a coup there. I think you’ll find that the coup was in Thailand (same continent at least).
Are you THICK some of the time, or all of the time?
“This is NOT to say that there aren’t others from other political parties that commit similar criminal offences – there most definitely are – but the proportion of criminals, electoral fraudsters, debt evaders, and benefit cheats etc seem to be considerably higher in the BNP than in other parties.”
No, the fraudsters sent us into 2 illegal wars in which hundreds of thousands have been murdered, where 125 of our innocent troops have been killed/murdered, where thousands of our people have been seriously injured, and million of iraq’s have been seriously injured.
The proportionate of criminals belong to the old gang parties.
The prime minister, not a candidate, not a councilour, not just an MP, but the PRIME MINISTER who order the deaths of thousands of people, is STILL a member of the new labour party, not to mention the other ministers, the other MP’s etc etc etc etc.
You have lost this argument PB, admit it.
Do you think new labour do themselves any favours keeping these members in the party?
When are the millions of people who voted for the above, going to apologise to the rest of us for the murder of thousands???
@jelly tot wrote:
Emma, what would be the point of an army air force or navy if they don’t do what the democratically elected government tell them to do? Regardless of whether you and I agree with it.
I’m sure, God forbid that if the bnp ever gained power, those idiots would drag not just us but the whole world into a racial war on scale that would make Hitler smile.
There wouldn’t be much point at all, whats your point? Remember the recent military coup (malaysia?), surely it would be justifiable for our military to say enough is enough and force the government out of office?
Currently we are edging towards a religious/racial WW3…who started it, Bush N Bliar not BNP…
If the BNP got into power, britain would be more shut off from the monster of the rest of the world, we would be encouraged to put our own good ship in order first.
You scare easy my friend.
