Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
How about a legal disc (like a tax disc), that states whether they are fully legal, thus no need for finger prints.
And the cars that don’t have a disk? Or the cars with a stolen disk? What do we do about them?
No disc, shouldn’t be on the road, its illegal, lock em up for 5 years with bread and water, and make em pay for the bread and water and charge em rent whilst in prison, and charge them for the security too.
You do that, NO ONE WOULD EVER DO IT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@forumhostpb wrote:
Oh yes … silly me I quite forgot this as an option. So your typical Mk 1 uninsured and possibly disqualified driver is naturally going to meekly drive home (possibly many many miles away) and Mr Plod is going to follow him home to see his (or even her) non existent licence and insurance. Yeah right – like that’s going to happen.
Apart from anything else Emma dearie, if Police ‘allow” a driver to drive home (i.e. give him / her their permission to carry on driving) when he/she is disqualified or has no insurance etc, THEY also commit an offence. Duh !!!!!
How about a legal disc (like a tax disc), that states whether they are fully legal, thus no need for finger prints.
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
The police don’t need to “follow him home” because they can fingerprint him there and then!
Have the police got records of your finger prints?
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
They don’t need to stop at random. They have a camera that reads the number plate, which then tells them if the car is stolen, wanted in connection with a crime, insured, taxed and MOT’d.
That’s when the driver tries to give a false ID, or cannot prove he is who he says he is.The if he cant provide evidence, he either leaves his car and gets it, or the police follow him home…
@forumhostpb wrote:
Emma dearie, loads of cars on the DVLA database have been ”sold” on to another person and the change of user hasn’t been notified.
You warn folk that if caught, you’ll spend a minimum of 5 years in a cell with bread and water or better but at the cost of the criminal.
Its just far too easy for people to get away with things, and whats the punishment ££££££££ which is what the government deperately need, because their useless at spending, and they can blag us by saying “weve spent more money on such n such, more than any government has ever spent…”, what they dont tell us is, that they dont spend it well.It isn’t ‘evidence’ to go round loking for uninsured vehicles at their registered keeper’s address, not finding them there, and then assuming that it is the ‘owner/keeper’ that is or was driving it at the time simply because it wasn’t where you expected to find it.[/b]
I never said someone should…i said if a vehicle isnt at home, then the owner needs a bloody good reason why.
@woohoo wrote:
But, if i’m going on holiday then i need a passport! To drive, i need a photo licence!
If…and if your not going abroad, or driving a car, you dont.
@woohoo wrote:
I agree! We need a photo licence to drive, a passport to go abroad, all to prove our identity, so why not I.D cards for everyday use? Unless i plan to commit a crime in the foreseeable future then i’d be in a position to change my mind!
We dont need either a photo licence or a passport, and if we have nothing to hide, we dont need an i.d card.
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
They do “gain access to those vehicles which don’t have insurance” by stopping them at the side of the road. That’s when the driver gives a false identity, or has no proof of ID. :roll:
I meant via DVLA. That way, they dont need to stop at random, those who dont need stopping, which is police time which is costing the tax payer, crime that is getting unsolved, crime that is occuring because theres less bobbies on the beat etc.
New labour will let crime get out of control, so they can tell us were “bad”, thus create ways of controlling us, and you fall for it hook line and sinker, reguly….
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Someone tell me, why did about 20 million people vote for those parties who think its cool to control us :roll:
YOU GET WHAT YOU VOTE FOR….
Perhaps you don’t mind if yourself, or a member of your family is disabled for life by a uninsured driver?
Ah yes, the spin answer to a police state…
Why dont the police (or insurance busters) just gain access to those vehicles which dont have insurance, and track them down? If the vehicle isnt at home, then you’d need a bloody good reason why it isnt.
Someone tell me, why did about 20 million people vote for those parties who think its cool to control us :roll:
YOU GET WHAT YOU VOTE FOR….
