Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@forumhostpb wrote:
I expect Emma that your BNP have a final solution to the problem of immigrants and asylum seekers. Put them up in ”holiday camps” for a while. They could even name these camps after well known historical ones like Belsen, Dachau, and Auschwitz.
Thats the kind of incitement to racial hatred i do not applaude.
@esmeralda wrote:
For fecks sake..don’t go lumping the Scottish National Party in with YOUR lot Emma :!:
Ok, they are a disastorous multicultural party i admit, but they want sepperation from my England.
VOTE SNP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If we close the borders to asylum seekers, refugees and mass immigration, we can spend more of OUR money on US.
Do you wana continue being a soft touch? If so, keep voting new conservatives, lib dems, new nazi labour, the greens, respect or even the multicultural EDP (English democrat party).
If you want society to look like you, behave like you, think like you, WORK FOR YOU, then vote for the England first party, England independance party, BNP, SNP.
Get involved, make a difference.
@rubyred wrote:
get digital ems,,,i get the lot for 15 a month :)
I cant afford digital/satelite on £27.70 per hour :wink:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
WTF does asylum have to do with a tourist getting robbed in Leicester Sq. Do you think translators and interpreters exist only to work with asylum seekers?
THIS THREAD IS ABOUT THE MONEY WASTED USING INTERPRETERS VIA ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES, AS STATED IN THE FIRST POST.
Tomorrow when you wake up, just give your head a slight tap.
ooh get Dawny :)
I cant afford itv2 at £27.70ph :wink:
What a great show. Gordon gets so upset, how the contestants manage i dont know. They must be half the weight by now.
I have a feeling the girl who joined the boys will win. Gordon must think highly of her the most, for putting her amongst those awfull men, and they won with her.
Me thinks Gordon is trying to show the Americans that there not the greatest at everything like they seem to think.
What a great way to let off steam (no pun intented) and frustration :)
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
So you’re saying police shouldn’t use interpreters.
Im not tierd, i just want a yawn emotive for this comment.
A, we shouldn’t have the mass asylum issue.
B, we shouldn’t be paying upto £66 ph to speak to them.
Ipso facto, this government is WASTING alot of tax paying, hard working, law abidding people’s money.If you could vote so that the money spent on interpreting asylum seekers words, is spent more directly on what benefits your life, would you?
Interpreters can earn a lot of money because they have specialist skills. sometimes the police will need to question people who don’t speak English. Let’s say a Croatian tourist who barely speaks any English gets robbed in Leicester Sq. What are the police supposed to do in that situation if they can’t communicate with the victim?
YOUR MISSING THE POINT, if we didnt have the asylum nightmare, then we wouldn’t have our taxes wasted at £33 – £66 per hour…
Do you understand?
@squeezy wrote:
Oh great….so us lot up here in Scotland are gonna freeze…. :roll:
In the last of a long line of natural global ice ages (that will continue for millions of years to come), the thames froze, and as far down as leeds was like the outskirts of the current north pole.
It will happen again, REGARDLESS of what humans do.
Its not how much we pay necessarily, its how there spent.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
So you’re saying police shouldn’t use interpreters.
Im not tierd, i just want a yawn emotive for this comment.
A, we shouldn’t have the mass asylum issue.
B, we shouldn’t be paying upto £66 ph to speak to them.
Ipso facto, this government is WASTING alot of tax paying, hard working, law abidding people’s money.If you could vote so that the money spent on interpreting asylum seekers words, is spent more directly on what benefits your life, would you?
