Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@sweetasbaileez wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Every political persuassion can talk about freedom for the sake of human kind.
Martin talked about black power and freedom for black people. He also talked about hating white people who prefered the democratic freedom to live apart from people like him.
And why shouldn’t He :?: :?: I talk about hating immigrants who rob our country and muslims who support terrorism :roll: :wink:
Nothing wrong with white power then?
Nothing wrong with white people wanting to live seperately from non whites?
Every political persuassion can talk about freedom for the sake of human kind.
Martin talked about black power and freedom for black people. He also talked about hating white people who prefered the democratic freedom to live apart from people like him.
So, how are we going to change the minds of fans from falling victim to the pshycological abuse their “own” club treat them with?
I think most fans just want their team to win, whatever the cost, because if they didn’t, they wouldn’t go, professional football is that bad commercially.
But how many fans are like you and me John?
Most fans think the player cares if he throws a fit, because he’s doing it for the “benefit” of their club – “for them”.
Complaining also puts pressure on the officials, because most fans will feel the player has been hard done to, so the fans will have a go at the ref. Pshycology.
Players, managers etc, USE the fans, the media etc to get what they want, and fans pay them HUGE sums of our hard earnt. Free admittence?
30 years ago, a player had to work hard playing football, and only football, if they wanted to earn a great living.
@johnboy25 wrote:
I’ve often wondered about how a footballers mind works
£
1. Why, when a player is flagged offside, does he take the shot anyway, miss, THEN complain about being offside?
Showmanship = £. He complains because he wants to “show” the fans he “cares”, this will encourage a good contract.
2. Why, when a player goes down in the box and no penalty is given, does he still put his hand in the air and throw a hissy fit? Has that ever worked?
The latter reason i just gave. I think it has worked, cant remember the situation though. But its one in zillion X zillion X zillion and X that all again by another 100 million zillion, and then your only half a percent there, at best.
Any others that just defy logic?
Logic dictates what humans do.
They took the decision to close the roof on friday, due to the weather conditions at the time, and what they thought it would be like the following day. They do this for safety reasons.
@forumhostpb wrote:
Are you OK Emma???? You didn’t mention ”zombies” or ”fascists” in your list of insults.
You can always use the edit facility and insert them so that readers will know it really was you that posted the reply.
I leave the editing to you, you love to change our democratic path to freedom of speech.
@slayer wrote:
So has the BNP seen the light and realised to be in power in this country you can’t have extremist policies
Extremism is an opinionated term, you extremist…
Will we see a migration away from non white policies towards pro British (which supports ALL Britons, not just one colour)- be prepared for some serious internal debate within the BNP
They are not for the british as i see, they stand for the prodomanent indigenous, white british.
Serious, another opinionated term slavery slayer, when will you be serious?
The BNP remain simply a protest party
EVERY party is a protest party. In the local elections, the conservatives gained the “kick blair” protest vote…New Labour came to power protesting about the cons and so on.
You heard it here first…..or does anyone really give a flying fig what they do anyway?
You do :wink:
I care more about smaller party’s, as i believe they encourage democracy, whereas the big girls encourage dictatorship.
“nick griffin, he may be a racist bully”
You maybe a racist bully…
@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Oh, and er yeah, i nearly forgot, the local media link doesn’t state which party he belongs to, media – old gang, old gang – media.
Emma, its a “local” paper- local papers dont print MP’s affiliations because “local” people know which party their “local” MP is from without having to repeat it every time the “local” paper mentions the “local” MP’s name.
What would be wrong in stating the party he belonged to? The article named where he’s an MP, why do people need to know that if he’s local? Whats your local MP/councillor(s)?
Ive seen who the Leic south MP is, ive heard him talk, numerous times, but for the life of me even now, i cant quite remember his name.
Had it been a BNP councillor, it would be worded constanly.
“how about starting posts about your wonderfull party members I bet it read with many strings of convictions eh….”
How about it? Why hasn’t those that have done, done so with the party they favour? Why havn’t you asked them to do that?
@slayer wrote:
Yep, I’ll believe everything they say, thanks Emma
Its a job to make us feel fear, yes, the same word fascists use to suggest the BNP are bad, fear is what the FBI use and now Labour use to make us feel we must vote for them.
Bring our troops home to guard the mosque just incase its needed.
