Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@pete wrote:
well i didnt like to be rude :lol:
Och, fill yer boots, there’s been worse said on this thread! :P
That’s 2 agin, 2 for, 1 don’t know, and 1 couldn’t give a flying f**k :lol:
@bassingbourne55 wrote:
So Americas first black (partly) president might find himself contesting his re-election in 2012 against a partly black woman.
Now, THERE’S a ding-dong I’d love to see!
I need a grey area. I love trees, but I’m way out in the country and in event of emergency need the car to get me to hospital in a hurry. Life or death ain’t black or white. Bugger it!
@pikey wrote:
I think your delusions might be kicking in again, Esme, old girl. You’re right, of course, this is a debate about the Lisbon Treaty, which makes your astonishing, off-topic, spiteful attack all the more silly. I see the plagiarism is still a favourite tictac, though the full article seems to have a different slant to your edited, unaccredited highlights.
Erm..no..mine came from The Morning Star, Pikey, to which I am a regular contributor as well as reader. Wasn’t it a terrific article? It was heads up whether I posted that or the WSP pamphlet. Glad to know you’re boosting our circulation.
As for spiteful attack, the instigation can be laid fully at your own door, firstly with calling my comments “ill thought out, knee jerk rants” then concluding with “small minded creatures like yourself.”
Your facility for recall is even worse than I thought, but you’re going strong on the old pettiness – sure you’ll be back with more insults and retorts and we can tussle till Doomsday and it matters not a donkey’s teat. I don’t like you, you don’t like me. I haven’t sought you out – on the contrary – so do yourself a favour – and stay out of my way, and where we meet on a thread of debate, try presenting your opinions as matters of belief and not as a means to lock horns with me. I really cannot be ar.sed!3 agin, 2 for, one disnae ken!
A scary scenario, Bassingbourne. I really don’t know the answer to this one. I would like to see Obama become the first black American President, but I don’t see it happening. I hope I’m wrong.
@pikey wrote:
@esmeralda wrote:
Ah, Pikey. I’m glad to see that being asked to resign from one site and chastised on another for maliciously stalking my good self – even, in the light of my illness, wishing me dead, hasn’t made you bitter and vengeful, to the extent of posting opinions diametrically opposed to my own, just for the spite of it.
How interesting. Asked to resign? Chastised? Stalking? Wishing you dead? Please explain. Doesn’t sound like anything resembling real life to me. It sounds like the old Esme that, when losing an argument, resorts to personal attacks.
Oh dear,memory loss at such an early age, Pikey? As for losing an argument, you couldn’t better me in a game of darts if you were three inches from the board with a blowpipe, far less in a debate – which incidentally is what this thread is about, differing opinions on The Lisbon Treaty, not an argument to be ‘won’ with three laps round the stadium by the victor.
Now, here’s a little something to help you with that memory loss:THE SENILITY PRAYER :
Lord, grant me the senility to forget the people
I never liked anyway,
the good fortune to run into the ones I do, and
the eyesight to tell the difference.That’s 2 fors, 2 agins, and 1 not sure!
Ah, Pikey. I’m glad to see that being asked to resign from one site and chastised on another for maliciously stalking my good self – even, in the light of my illness, wishing me dead, hasn’t made you bitter and vengeful, to the extent of posting opinions diametrically opposed to my own, just for the spite of it.
Oh – and yes – I voted Scottish Nationalist in order to get shot of an increasingly right-wing, English Government lackey Labour party. The Nationalist Left see the EU reform treaty as a key opportunity for taking the offensive against the big-business dominance of their parties – not in any abstract sense, but because it now directly threatens democracy itself.The SNP was historically opposed to the European Union. In 1975, it campaigned for a No vote alongside the STUC and the Labour left. Billy Wolfe, its chairperson through the 1970s, attacked the EU as undemocratic and centralist. By christ, he was right, and it’s a view the SNP would be wiser to adopt now.
Anyways, including vengeful eejits, we have 2 agin, one for, and one not sure. Any more for any more? And Pepper, don’t set the question then run away without giving us your own slant on the matter.
