@smiley wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
…… do the eeerrrmmmmm “larger” female users of this site use wafer thin, sexy, scantily dressed ladies in their signature pictures… :?: :?
Cos if they had ladies in their signatures that represented how … errrrrmmmmmm.. “larger”… they are in real life, their signature would be too large and be rejected, or deleted :)
Hope this answers your reasonable question, Fastcars.
This is all well and good Mr. Smiles and perfectly plausible…. but…. very very misleading. I have personally contacted a few of the females that use the most scantily clad, sexiest pictures to promote themselves (thinking “stupidly” of course that they themselves may resemble these pics in some way) only to be seriously let down and more than a tadge disappointed.
Its only after you have been sent a “real” picture of the person behind the screen that you realise the “horrible” truth. In fact…. in my experience… the more erotic and sexy the woman in their signature pic… the eeerrrrmmmmm ” uglier ” they tend to be in real life. :-…