Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
17 October, 2006 at 6:39 pm #244716
Mr PB Sir…….. Now that a fight forum has been formed is it possible to move this thread into it so we can really rip into each other instead of this soppy hands off handbag style stuff we have had to put up with the last few days…… O:)
17 October, 2006 at 8:13 am #244706And has this thread got smaller again in the last couple of hours… :?
17 October, 2006 at 8:10 am #244766Benito is his uncle….. 8)
17 October, 2006 at 8:06 am #244705and they all lived happily ever after…..
or did they… :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
16 October, 2006 at 9:59 pm #244690@popeye wrote:
@pats wrote:
@popeye wrote:
Well that took me bloody ages to read :lol:
Amazing how things esculate in this place, good reading though :)
we aim to plz. :lol:
I need to come here a bit more often, whats a man gotta do to get of abuse around here :lol:
Talking with Pats is a very good way of getting abused if thats what your looking for… :twisted: :twisted: :wink:
16 October, 2006 at 9:47 pm #244683@peeved wrote:
@pats wrote:
i’m not jumping on any bandwagon geoff. just puting my point of view across as i see it. u have said urself…u enjoy the mudslinging.i havnt defended anyone either.if anything my post was aimed at PB……..the old fa/rt (Thank you for that !!! Bloody ageist !!! ….Ed) :lol: like i said to rainy..we have got along the past few weeks…..and as rainy pointed out.we have had numerous digs at each other in the past….but thats where it as stayed. i remember i think making a post a while back when peeved mentioned the cam thing……..saying something along the lines of.ffsnot that old chestnut. maybe people read me completely wrong from the posts i make….i have never ever recieved a pm telling me to stay away from u.i have never sent a pm….and i aint part of a clique either. i WAS called an idiot in msn however for avin a laugh on the boards with you. that person and i still chat on the boards but they are no longer in my msn. i do not like being told who i can and cannot chat too!. at the end of the day i read the posts same as everyone else and draw my own conclusions. whether that be agreeing with you.or someone else.none of us are whiter than white. i stand by the fact however that you have made quite a few degoraty(spellcheck) posts…we all have!. PB stated posts made directly at another user to cause trouble would be deleted…….and i still stand by the fact that yours havnt been deleted as quickly as other peoples.
no one is picking on you as far as i can see just replying with their own take on things regarding the things you have said. and your perfectly right.pete was equally as bad as you.i should have stated that in my post.i apologise.but like i say.my post wasnt aimed at u.it was for PB.Mentioned again, what a delight!
We thought we would give you a bit-part to make you feel important.
16 October, 2006 at 5:13 pm #244677@geoff wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
This thread was directed at Martin after he deleted not just your thread Geoff but about 4 others started by myself and Cath yesterday morning while u were still in cloud cuckoo land. I even mention Martin by name to ensure that it was clear who was the target of the backlash. PB’s name never even got mentioned until he took it upon himself to speak on Martins behalf. Which I find all rather baffling because as far as I am aware PB never even got chance to read the threads in question…… :?
I can only assume that the Geoff mentioned since page 4 isn’t me then. Laters, off for a curry.
This thread turned towards you after Rainy jumped in wearing her size 10 ballet shoes and dragging her pet poodle Matty along with her try to defend you from something you had never actually been accused of. Unwittingly, instead of coming to your aid, she actually managed to get everybodys backs up for commenting on a subject she actually knew NOTHING about. She turned the spotlight onto you and that unfortunately is where it has stayed. As she even said herself…. “she never got to read the threads in question”. Maybe she should think next time before she comes waltzing into a topic that in all honesty… has got sod all to do with her.
P.S. I did try explaining this early in the discussion but unfortunately somebody thought its content was suitable only for deletion with only a couple of people actually getting the time to read it before it vanished from our screens…. :roll:
16 October, 2006 at 4:49 pm #244676This thread was directed at Martin after he deleted not just your thread Geoff but about 4 others started by myself and Cath yesterday morning while u were still in cloud cuckoo land. I even mention Martin by name to ensure that it was clear who was the target of the backlash. PB’s name never even got mentioned until he took it upon himself to speak on Martins behalf. Which I find all rather baffling because as far as I am aware PB never even got chance to read the threads in question…… :?
16 October, 2006 at 1:45 pm #244668@cath 55 wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
@Tory Girl wrote:
*gets a cup of coffee to read back through this, it was at 6 pages when I looked earlier* :shock:
And we still havent got to the bottom of why Martin deleted a perfectly good topical thread… :?:
or to the how fasty sprained his ankle :roll: 8)
mwahh fasty how’s the ankle? xxxx :lol: :lol: :wink:
Last time I ever try and teach my lad how to be a football pro… :lol:
16 October, 2006 at 1:42 pm #244666@Tory Girl wrote:
*gets a cup of coffee to read back through this, it was at 6 pages when I looked earlier* :shock:
And we still havent got to the bottom of why Martin deleted a perfectly good topical thread… :?:
-
AuthorPosts
