Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 January, 2007 at 6:58 pm #257586
@American Woman wrote:
My point proven PB – =D>
In my opinion, the international community has become desensitized.I don’t agree with ”desensitised” … more like bored bloody senseless.
I mean, it’s not as if the Jews were the only group murdered by the Nazis. They slaughtered a whole range of groups from gypsies through homosexuals, communists, dwarves, cripples, the insane, etc etc. You don’t hear THEM go on and on about it do you?
If you want to argue on a numerical basis then Uncle Jo Stalin did in (allegedly) some 20 million Russians in his lifetime – which kinda puts the Jews into perspective. THEY don’t go moaning on about Holocausts and want the entire world to mourn their loss do they???
The last Century is in fact littered with dictators who presided over the slaughter of their so-called enemies. Do we have an International Pol Pot Day of Mourning??? No we don’t.
As I said, the whole thing happened some time before the middle of the last Century. It’s over and done with and it’s way past time to move on.
24 January, 2007 at 3:45 pm #256777What utter and complete rubbish !!!!
If you want to lose weight – just eat less !!! If you’re a big fat porker ….. eat less !!! If you’re a wobbly lardbucket ….. eat less !!!!
….and if you’re a UGO …. go choke yourself on a fat boy’s fry-up !!!
24 January, 2007 at 3:40 pm #257583Nah – bad idea. If you have one for the Jews then everybody would want a Memorial Day for their group. You’d spend all year remembering dead people from the last hundred years or more. There’d be no end to it.
They should let it go and move on. After all it’s the 21st Century now!!!
24 January, 2007 at 3:01 pm #257556She’s really knocking herself out for him isn’t she???
BTW – is she a member on here???
24 January, 2007 at 2:58 pm #257381OK Emma I understand what whites can say and non-whites (i.e. Black & Asian and presumably Oriental) as well.
But what about those of mixed race???? What can they say???
24 January, 2007 at 2:55 pm #255560@r.O.T.T wrote:
in the next election will pay the most benefits
and cater for us long term unemployed
we are always the forgotten people
we have rightsThis is a ‘no brainer’.
VOTE: MONSTER RAVING LOONEY
We will look after you good and proper matey. Unlimited payments from HM Treasury if you’re unemployed. No taxes if you work for a living. Free passports and UK full citizenship if you’re an ‘illegal’.
All this will be funded by a word tax on the media and a slurp tax on liquorice.
You know it makes (no) sense so …….
VOTE MONSTER RAVING LOONEY
Because ……………… we care !!!!!
24 January, 2007 at 11:46 am #257573Oh ….My ….. God….. !!! It’s true then. The entire thing was a sickening plot created by the Freemasons. They built the twin towers on top of a volcano and heavily insured it. Then they waited until two jets accidentally crashed into them and claimed on the insurance. If it wasn’t for the volcano erupting (controlled by the Freemasons of course) the whole thing wouldn’t have happened.
I also heard that the entire WTC thing was a hoax. The CIA built a replica in the Arizona desert and that was what we saw collapsing. The real WTC is still there but the CIA employed David Copperfield to make it appear as if it isn’t there. They have since imprisoned David in Cuba to prevent him from telling the media.
The Pentagon one was also obviously a hoax designed specifically to assassinate a high level military delegation from Russia and make millions of dollars for the US defence industry.
WOW Emma …. thank you for opening all of our eyes to this dastardly plot.
23 January, 2007 at 3:56 pm #257418@geoff wrote:
If he was a woman he’d have phantom pregnancies as well.
I thought he was …. mind you he behaves like an old woman.
23 January, 2007 at 3:54 pm #257511@geoff wrote:
She’s not even shaggable!
You say that …. but apparently she is (or was) pretty liberal with her favours. Mind you, SOMEBODY must have managed it, as she has two children. Maybe it was a dark night????
Please address all complaints to:
Jade Goody,
Kennel No 69,
c/o The Battersea Dog’s Home
Battersea
London SW.22 January, 2007 at 10:11 am #257384Without wishing to be unduly pedantic Tommy, but the age of majority in this country is 18. This means that an adult (i.e. someone who is over the age of 18 ) can quite legally and properly ”date” an 18 or 19 year old who, whilst still being a teenager, is also an adult.
Perhaps you might like to re-consider your stance???
-
AuthorPosts
