Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 4,961 through 4,970 (of 5,314 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #167799

    @Ow£n Ka$h wrote:

    Young man?!!! :shock:

    Yes….. another internet lie !!!

    #167867

    Actually……… no.

    Sorry

    #83388

    the study of rocks

    #167865

    Until tomorrow.

    #167916

    @squeezy wrote:

    Don’t you think it’s weird when coincidences occur?

    No.

    #161161

    @robyn wrote:

    :-k I think PB is Geoff……actually maybe me and PB are the only ones on here and PB is EVERYONE else :shock:

    I think you’ve hit the nail on the head.

    RIP – PB – Missing in action somewhere or other – November 2005

    #166990

    @Ow£n Ka$h wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    Maybe it does take a rocket scientist after all Giggles !!!

    Still missing Verruca PB? :(

    God yes !!! I have fallen in love with her vicious tongue mmmmmmmmmm it fair sends shivers up my spine !!!

    #161154

    **** Waits for someone to accuse ROBBO of being Captain Geoffers (deceased).******

    RIP Captain Geoffers – Killed in action November 2005

    #166973

    Maybe it does take a rocket scientist after all Giggles !!!

    #166970

    @Lambrini Girl wrote:

    I think you either misread that thread or you are being deliberately blind to stress a point PB. Only one person assumed Clouseau was Geoff. The rest of the “sisterhood” as you put it only stated the obvious … that Clouseau was a regular in disguise.

    Having re-read the thread, and on a strict interpretation, I think that you may well be right. In point of fact it was more that one person and there were several oblique references as well, but to be fair you have a good point and maybe I did overstate mine for emphasis..

    However my general point stands which is that users rush to blame the current bogeyman (Captain Geoffers at present) as soon as a thread or comment appears criticising one of the sisterhood and their ‘friends’. A lot of times it just isn’t him at all, but the paranoia persists and adds to the urban legend.

    @Lambrini Girl wrote:

    It is very noble of you to defend Geoff in his voluntary absence, but some objectivity would be nice. Geoff didn’t get “constantly attacked”. He got reactions to his own very personal tirades.

    Actually this is only partly true. Yes he certainly brought most of the attacks on himself, and I suspect quite deliberately so as some sort of wind up.

    But there are also users who equally can’t let go and have started a thread out of the blue with the specific intention of having a go at him. Then of course everybody joins in and off we go again.

    @non flouncing and uncomplaining Lambrini girl wrote:

    For general information, I have never once complained to anybody about anybody. Everything I have had to say I have said on the boards. I did however consider getting my account deleted. As you said, you can only take so much …. bearing in mind I still have no idea as to why Geoff lashed out at me the way he did. As you seem to know him better than most, maybe you could find out and let me know?

    In truth I don’t know why Captain Geoffers appeared to take a dislike to you. I say appeared, as for him most of this stuff was words on a screen and didn’t represent reality. He thoroughly enjoyed a wind up and if he could get somebody going, then that was a result.

    I have the feeling that he labelled you as having little sense of humour and always wanting the last word. Maybe that is a libel and not a label – I don’t know. Maybe you even lived down to this virtual reputation, or maybe not – who knows? But I am sure that he felt no personal animosity towards you, as he so obviously did towards certain others.

    RIP Captain Geoffers. Killed in action – November 2005

Viewing 10 posts - 4,961 through 4,970 (of 5,314 total)