Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Well we all know the reason why “…..those monsters will get new identities when they emerge from jail” don’t we?
The tabloids would take enormous pleasure in publishing their addresses and suchlike and as night follows day, “those monsters” will be killed by a baying mob whipped up into a frenzy of self justified rage. (A bit like all the “friends” of Sharon Matthews eh?).
Now you might want to argue that they were getting all they richly deserved. If so why bother imprisoning them at all, in fact why bother putting them on trial? All you need is a few inflammatory articles in the Sun or Mail etc and an accused could be simply dragged out of their homes into the street and summarily butchered by a mob.
Alternatively, you might want to take the view that a legal punishment is just that, and that once an offender has served their time, they should be allowed to return into society.
I am left to remember the paediatrician in Southampton who was hounded out of their home and nearly killed in the street, all because a bunch of Sun readers mistook “paediatrician” for “paedophile”.
Agreed …. but as I’ve said, that’s Contracts of Employment for you.
It’s all very well for the tabloid Media to scream for her blood, but they only do this to wind everybody up and thus sell more of their fish-n-chip wrappers.
Like it or not, she is an employee and as such she has legal rights – just like the rest of us. Kicking her out without a penny isn’t ”justice” it IS vindictive and legally it IS unfair.
Her real punishment is that she is at the top of her profession and she has now fallen right to the bottom. She will never be able to get another job at anywhere that level again. THAT is her punishment.
Kicking her out just before Christmas (“Happy Christmas Sharon….. oh and BTW – YOU’RE FIRED!!!”) with no compensation and way of paying her mortgage or any of her household bills seems to me to be totally over the top. After all SHE didn’t commit a criminal offense; SHE didn’t murder a child did she?
@pete wrote:
Our users have posted a total of 408232 articles
We have 1854 registered usersthat should be 220.18985976267529665587918015102 posts per registered user.
Now i know for a fact i’ve made one or two more than that so whose not keeping their end up then
More to the point …… which one of you posted 0.18985976267529665587918015102 of a post?????
Come then … own up !!!!
I wouldn’t chortle too early if I were you. She will have a pretty tight contract of employment and my bet is that her union will be obliged to defend her.
How about the next headline is “Sharon Shoesmith sues LB Haringey for unfair dismissal” or better still “I was victimised” claims unfairly dismissed Sharon Shoesmith.
Watch this space!
BTW: don’t run away with the idea that I am defending her ….. far from it. But I do understand the realities of life and in particular Local Authority employment contracts.
….. she’s also a rather good singer – with a deliciously sexy little wiggle.
Bye bye “squeaky” Diana. Poor little Eoghan, he’s going to be soooo upset now that little splotchy red-face isn’t there to keep him warm at nights.
So it’s down to Alexandra; JCB; and poor little Eoghan.
As long as Alexandra wins … I don’t really care who comes second.
Mind you it would be worth it if JCB came third, just to see the effete Louise crying again.
Er ………. do you really care???
@cherrybomb wrote:
The only positive thing about this case is that Shannon is alive, away from her mother, and hopefully with time and guidance, will grow up learning more valuable morals about life than she ever would have learned at home.
Good job she doesn’t live in Haringey then as the Social Services would have returned her to the mother and her sub-normal paedophile boyfriend ….. after doing a full report of course.
@woohoo wrote:
Woman assaulted with cheeseburger
An American has been charged with assaulting his girlfriend – by shoving a cheeseburger in her face.
Vincent Gonzalez, 22, got into a heated row with her as they ate a McDonald’s meal in their car in Florida, reports The Sun.
When he would not let her out of the vehicle she retaliated by hurling his drink out of the window. He is then said to have rammed the burger in her face.
They both climbed out and Gonzalez apparently smeared it in her face once again. He has been charged with domestic violence.My views:
Why was she not charged with Littering?
Maybe because she was a messy eater and made up this story as an excuse when a passer by niticed her and started laughing at her.
Moral of the story: Never go out for a McDonald’s ratburger with a messy eater.
I’m not clear on whether the moral of the story is that you shouldn’t pick your nose anywhere …. or just in Manchester.
I’ve heard it said that Mancunians are a bunch of nosepickers, so maybe this habit is more prevalent there than elsewhere in the UK.
I guess the bast thing when next you see a bleeding Mancunian, is to ask him if he’s been picking his nose.
