GAZLAN

This great video showing the innovation of those in need.

:P

@cath 55 wrote:

this is a lovely post eve and i agree thatsometimes folk do change things for change sake and also there is far too much judging ‘book’ by their cover goes on.

my only other comment on this thread is that its a shame that it has to an extent gone off track a little x

Yes it’s awful business, almost as awful as wishing people w…[Read more]

@eve wrote:

@GAZLAN wrote:

Allegory :lol:

The ‘Holy book’ is full of them lol

and your full of shyte. now pee off

Fuck you old stinker

Close but no ceegar!!! :roll:

@jen_jen wrote:

You don’t recognise the person in the top picture?

As I said, there’s lots out there if you look but I have no doubt that however many I present, you will find a way of brushing them aside as it doesn’t serve your purpose. Go looking if you’re really interested, I have more productive things to do with my time than to humour you in…

[Read more]

Be my guest.

It’s just theoretical non-sense! :lol:

@Melody wrote:

If you back every theory Gaz then once or twice you might hit lucky. You certainly hedge your bets. :wink:

Now I believe this thread was about friendship…..

Then why did you digress?

For your convenience
:)

NONE showing anyone of significance in control of shaping policies regarding the point I made I see. Tell me, who is in the top picture? Now if you can show images or give me a link to images showing any of the leaders in the picture below observing this so called ‘custom, then do it!

It is probably possible to find Micky mouse wearing the head…[Read more]

@Mrs_Teapot wrote:

Gives Gaz a slap…….because I can :?

Never felt a thing ~ said the lazy roofer. :wink:

Allegory :lol:

The ‘Holy book’ is full of them lol

@eve wrote:

@GAZLAN wrote:

Interesting. The very same vatican that excluded certain material from the ‘holy book’ no less!

O ffs Gaz. it was an allegory. Y do u have to start every time?

Because I can! :P

The discovery of a site where old black and white film ‘noir’ can be downloaded, a great source of times gone by in film format. :D

@Melody wrote:

Well you are a prime example Gaz with all the conspiracy theories you research and believe in….. :)

Count if you will how many one time theories have been proven as factual over the years, this will show the depth of your response above.

Do you mean to tell me there are still gullible people out there? :shock:

Interesting. The very same vatican that excluded certain material from the ‘holy book’ no less!

@jen_jen wrote:

When you start replying to people who ask you for evidence rather than pointing them at half-baked conspiracy sites, then I’ll reciprocate, until then you can do your own googling, you seem to be reasonably good at it despite the blinkers.

You will not reciprocate because to do so will prove my point. What are these ‘half baked…[Read more]

Whether or not I can support my point is not the question is it?

This is ~

Why don’t you support that within the context of my point ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b014f1mv/Saturday_Play_Washington_9_11/

Good old beeb
:wink:

@jen_jen wrote:

I’ve found several, I’m sure you can do the same if you’ve a mind to…but you won’t as it doesn’t serve your purpose.

I will ask you again . . Support what you post! You can post images so let us see them. :roll: