@gazlan wrote:
The above link was about an IRISH CASE – wtf has the queen got to do with the Rep. Now Gaz your going around in circles and needing two posts to ask questions about one posts shows you dont read they that carefully the first time.
YOU will need to take up that with the narrator. . . I simply draw attention to what he highlights under common law. Whatever he was accused of doing is void unless prosecuted in accordance with ‘the law’. Do you contest this FACT?[/b]
You cheeky git –
The above link was about an IRISH CASE – wtf has the queen got to do with the Rep. And the Queens council in England and over here (where your link was in relation to) is known as Senior or/and Junior Council.
^^^^^ thats what i posted!!!!!.
Yes in accordance with the law, but you posted it as he beat the law, HE DIDNT. He got off on a tectnacallity. (or however its spelt) – that was my point from the start.
as what to reserch – well you seem to be a “fight the MAN” kinda person YET you post links without knowing what their about. And without paying taxes you feel the right to say how your and now my Country should be run!!! bloody cheek.