Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@forumhostpb wrote:
Just for the avoidance of doubt – we are deleting posts that are ”abusive” as soon as they are seen. If we miss one and as a result a whole thread becomes one long chain of abuse then the whole thread will get deleted.
Sure let’s all argue, debate, banter, gosssip and so on but above all let’s all do it without resorting to name calling and personal insults.
What day are you getting round to doing the Polls pages PB or are Kate’s namecalling and personal insult threads not considered abusive enough? I agree with this new policy btw (long overdue!): I used to cringe at some of the stuff you used to leave on there – I just hope things don’t get too draconian round these parts!
I like a soft Irish accent but I would hate to think people are being judged purely on their accents. How shallow is that??!! I think it is important to point out that you can have the sexiest accent in the whole wide world but it’s no use if you haven’t got a decent pair of tits to back it up with.
@rubyred wrote:
i WAS captain of the ROCKWELL girls netball team james ! can ya beleive it i look fat with a blood disorder but i was a wee girl !
Did you get your Top Ten games put on video Ruby? I am sure we would all like to see the famous clip of a wee innocent Ruby headbutting the defender before netting the extra-time winner… :wink:
Hpapy Brihtday Mary J!!!!!
@kentlass19 wrote:
i got an A* on my poetry mock :D
only too weeks til proper exam :shock:
Was William marking it? :wink:
(good luck in exam)
I couldn’t find the press release either which I assume means that it was factually incorrect and has been withdrawn. I did search through the other press releases tho (searchword: BNP) and found an interesting article about housing policy dated 25 April 2006. It is worth reading in it’s entirety to see just how the BNP seems to routinely lie and blow things out of proportion (link above) however, here are some extracts:
‘The number of asylum seekers housed by Barking and Dagenham Council is the lowest for five years.
In fact since 2000, the Council has not housed any new asylum seekers, unless they are children who arrive in Barking and Dagenham with no adult to look after them.
In response to questions from the media on this matter following Mr. Griffin’s comments on television, David Woods, Corporate Director of Customer Services has confirmed that only four Council properties are currently allocated to asylum seekers.
“Our properties are consistently being used to accommodate local people who are in need of social housing, including young families, key workers such as policemen and nurses, and older people. They are being housed through the Council’s new More Choice in Lettings Scheme. This scheme does not allocate any properties according to ethnicity. Accommodation is provided using the criteria, regardless of racial group, of people who live or work in the Borough or who have a strong local connection. The successful scheme has seen almost 1,000 people matched up with suitable properties since it launched in May 2005.”
Now, far be for me to use statistics (heheh) but this council has over 20,000 council properties and over 1000 leasehold flats. Only FOUR out of 21,000 are currently allocated to asylum seekers (which must be the lowest rate in the country) and the rest are allocated according to needs “regardless of racial group“.If anything, they should be taking in MORE (their fair share of) asylum seekers but, overall, it certainly seems fair to me – if they were not being fair wouldn’t the BNP challenege the council in the courts?
Most people only want fair treatment: That’s probably why the Labour council got re-elected and BNP didn’t get a sniff!
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
You found Marys stash James? :lol:
Erm this was on the Serious Posts Page to take the mickey out of the Dog Knapping thread but PB must have moved it – was funny at the time!!!! :roll:
Who’s Pat? Does she live north of Watford?
btw I got it obs just I wasn’t in on time – you goatta luv these people really!
@poshy wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
So everybody, here’s the news. Gosh I told a lie some time ago!! ‘Magoo’ isn’t female after all – ‘Magoo’ is actually a male – Wow !!!:-s
Well folks, given PB’s history of gender confusion :lol: – perhaps you should all be seeking a Male Rainbow :-k
8-[
Is it Poet then?
Cheers Tiggy, another one off the ‘worry list’… I’ll wait til Lucky proves it isn’t her before I accuse someone else! We’ll get there in the end…
