Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
5 June, 2007 at 1:00 pm #272640
Sorry, what did I say that I believed that you obviously don’t agree with?
4 June, 2007 at 1:33 pm #272238How did you beat level 28??
2 June, 2007 at 7:24 pm #270103Forgot to mention too, Bat. They are leaving the kids with relatives which, as I stated earlier, is a bit hypocritical. Presumably they’re expected to take more responsibility for them than their own parents?
2 June, 2007 at 7:22 pm #270102@ubermik wrote:
Has anyone even checked the house?
Taking into account their dilligence perhaps they totally forgot to even take her with them in the first place :lol:
That really shouldn’t be funny :lol: :lol: :lol:
2 June, 2007 at 6:09 pm #270098Don’t know if I’d have worded it like that but pretty much. I see they’re back in Portugal spending a few days with the twins before jetting off again. Very noble. Considering they don’t know what’s happening, I wonder what they make of mummy & daddy going away then coming back then going away again.
Seemingly they don’t intend to leave Portugal without Maddie which no doubt means we’ll all be asked to dig deep to pay for another few weeks. I thought doctors got paid pretty well but obviously not.
Why aren’t the media paying for it since they care so much? That way they can feel like they’re doing more than just telling us stuff we already know or don’t need to know.
2 June, 2007 at 5:06 pm #270096@ubermik wrote:
“Scum” that obviously DONT think its good parenting to leave toddlers unnaccompanied whilst socialising
Which would make the Mcanns somewhat lower than scum wouldnt it
Well said and I’d love to know exacly where R.O.T.T stands on the irresponsibility issue since it’s obviously wrong to condemn it. Which leads me to one conclusion…
2 June, 2007 at 3:49 pm #270094Aww…you say the sweetest things!
1 June, 2007 at 11:18 am #270088Another day – another photo of ‘look how close the balcony and the resteraunt are’ which will achieve the square root of hee-haw.
She might be in Madrid, which, given that she could be anywhere, is smart thinking. It’s only a matter of time before they turn up on my doorstep, full media circus in tow, stating ‘She might be in your shed’
Is it right that they intend to muscle in on another missing girl to try and devalue the relevance of that case? Or maybe we’ll start to see adverts etc of this other girl as a show of unity or something. I doubt it somehow, it’s obviously not as important…
31 May, 2007 at 10:20 pm #270084There’s an advert now! Don’t know if it’s been on before but that’s the first I’ve seen it. Next stop – Madrid. It’s almost like an episode of ‘Challenge Aneka’ or whatever that show was called.
So which one of the pictures is distracting you, Uber?
31 May, 2007 at 5:45 pm #270080What about the latest little nugget: A butterfly landed her during ‘An Audience With The Pope’ and she reckons it’s a symbol of hope.
Or yesterday, saying to the kids ‘I’ll be back before bedtime’ I’m sure they’ve heard that before somewhere. Or ‘It’s hard to leave them’ Really? It was pretty easy before. Strange how they expect their relatives to be more responsible in looking after the kids than they were.
-
AuthorPosts
