Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
18 May, 2008 at 10:18 pm #336551
Right here :lol:
I don’t see how it’s sexist, doll face.
18 May, 2008 at 5:40 pm #336548Haven’t seen it for a while, there is a Rampant Rabbit one which looks strangely aluring but it’s not that one :lol:
18 May, 2008 at 5:19 pm #336546Which one?
18 May, 2008 at 5:12 pm #336544Actually, that’s where your wrong – that would be my dream woman but my ideal woman is something entirely different. No personality equals no feckin way.
Pete just keep hitting refresh, I’m not doing that but I’m guessing it’ll appear eventually.
18 May, 2008 at 5:07 pm #336541Just have to figure out which one’s my favourite :lol:
18 May, 2008 at 4:52 pm #336540It’s goooooooooood! :D I’m single btw, just incase you’re not sure.
But, like I said, considering how strict they are on here with their editing sometimes it’s even better.
18 May, 2008 at 4:45 pm #336537Not at all, I’d be saying the exact same thing if I was a lesbian. So there, you women are just as bad :lol:
18 May, 2008 at 4:40 pm #317891@sir Actor wrote:
What surprises me is why so many fans support a team that would struggle to avoid relegation from the English Premiership..
Well as they don’t play in england it’s a bit of a no brainer. So why do Derby have any fans? Why does any team that’s not in the premiership have any fans? What’s their excuse?
the desire to impress is the home of the truly insecure
Unless you do it of course. You can always gloss over it so it doesn’t count. Anyway, I’m not dressing it up and I’m certainly not condoning the actions of those scummers who call themselves fans (maybe try paying attention?) All I’m saying is that it’s naive to brand all Rangers fans by the actions of a mindless minority who by rights should have been the only ones who got cracked in the skull. Because of their actions, a lot of innocent people suffered.
If that sounds like a glowing commendation then I suggest it is you who has the problem.
18 May, 2008 at 3:39 pm #317886@*GG* wrote:
You’ll not agree with what I’m going to say John but I have to agree with Anita and say ‘sore losers’. Off course it wasn’t the vast majority that caused the trouble, just a small minority, but it’s that small minority that has tarnished the reputation of the decent Rangers fans.
I know it wasn’t the vast majority, but it appears that it’s a case of ‘one in, all in’ for some on these boards and I’m not about to be lumped in with those scummers.
I don’t agree that it was a case of being bad losers, I think it’s a case of some people having no respect for their club or anyone else around them for that matter. Anyone who objected to the heavy handed policing should be pointing the finger of blame firmly at those who left them with no choice but to react in that matter.
kevin are these comments something you actually believe or are you just trying to impress the ‘chatroom desperados’?
18 May, 2008 at 2:38 pm #317883@*GG* wrote:
@johnboy25 wrote:
Wouldn’t go that far but you’re close enough. He had no need to get involved so f**k him. I hope it hurt and I hope he learned something from it.
So no doubt was well known by cops then. If it was anybody else bar him, the dog wouldn’t have been released. Fuck him then, he deserved it alright. :wink:
If he wasn’t then he is now. Idiot was in the papers talking about his traumatic experience and how badly he was treated. I feel sorry for those who didn’t deserve any of this bad press and Manchester and its people who made a tremendous effort only for some scummers to piss all over it.
Oh, and when I say ‘some’ I don’t mean every single last one of them and even the Rangers fans who weren’t there but are still every bit as guilty.
-
AuthorPosts
