Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 April, 2008 at 5:19 pm #322543
@rainbowbrite wrote:
The plot thickens even more…..
Oh dear.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7331107.stm
Nothing to do with the images the step dad had on the comp but aiding kidnap and perverting the course of justice.
*sigh* I feel its not the end. Far from it.
what you sighing for you stupid f’ucker
i’m delighted the scum are getting their come uppance
what a blessing all this is for shannon
she will hopefully be adopted by someone who will show her a better path4 April, 2008 at 5:12 pm #323090i’m sure you two gurners are far more aesthetically pleasing
4 April, 2008 at 5:06 pm #323067@anita Gofradump wrote:
Sorry…
The page you have requested does not exist or is no longer available.just like your intellect
4 April, 2008 at 4:45 pm #322852there are far bigger freaks judging
so long as the child is welcome
what has it got to do with anyone
especially the chatboard mothers who clearly dedicate all their spare time away from the computer being role model parents3 April, 2008 at 8:35 pm #316463@(f)politics? wrote:
now correct me if im wrong here cos i only read half of it but if someone copied a convo in msn to someone else and someone didnt like it why an earth is it being bought up and gone through with a fine tooth comb in full public view seems to be alot of tit for tat and hypocrisy and lies and i didnt do this they did here why not agree to disagree now cos it seems its pretty equal footing now.
why dont you mind your own business
on second thought why not stay your thick enough to fit in3 April, 2008 at 8:21 pm #316462the four stooges are back in their comfort zone
i really cannot dumb down enough for this
magic mushrooms dont cause this much delusion
enjoy3 April, 2008 at 6:42 pm #316452@pats wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
well back to the thread, despite there seeming to be a deliberate and admitted act of entrapment Im pleased those involved have come to some sort of agreement without too much dirty linen being exposed.
Dirty and low, but glad its concluded.
opefully shazza..unless kev persists in denyin he showed me pics…………….fancy a whalemeat omlette? :wink:
my word you are dumb
you havent picked up a single reality
when or where did i ever say i did’nt show or swop photos
your memory is myopic to your vision of your own greatness
god bless you for all you will never understand
they say ignorance is bliss
no wonder you are so happy1 April, 2008 at 9:04 pm #3164151 April, 2008 at 8:08 pm #316412@*Sian wrote:
@kevin wrote:
@*Sian wrote:
Have you all made up now? Are you back in a happy place? :lol:
i never fell out
i merely pointed outI don’t want to see what’s in your undies either…. :lol:
stop flirting
1 April, 2008 at 8:05 pm #322288@forumhostpb wrote:
True …. but it’s only the retail margin that has been affected by the supermarkets. The record company still gets a ‘fair’ price from the supermarkets (or chain retailers) geared usually to volume.
People who (illegally) download for free from various sites simply steal without paying.
this isnt new
this stems back to the days when we used to record the top 40 played on a sunday night with our single tape recorders -
AuthorPosts
