Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@*Sian wrote:
Have you all made up now? Are you back in a happy place? :lol:
i never fell out
i merely pointed out@*Sian wrote:
@kevin wrote:
@pats wrote:
@minim wrote:
The fact remains, you used the example of a picture shown to you in msn and then dragged me into the conversation Pats. Cheap shot.
I am not going to continue rowing with you. You obviously thrive on all the banter and sniping, but it doesn’t float my boat. You have been doing it for years and years and years, and are pretty good at it if I might say so.
I think this thread ended up being unnecessary.
thats what you get for starting a thread to have a sly dig. it backfires. i may be good at banter……..but at least i do it upfront and with good reason. you basically know fook all that went on between me and rott. well …….maybe his version. but your right……..its boring now. i have nothing to be ashamed of. as he?
i wasnt going to comment on this because it is to tedious for words
as i’m tedious i shall
what went on between me and pats if my memory serves me right absolutely nothing
she is just one of a few people i have encountered in my long jc journey
she seems to suggest she knows me intimately(for your benefit pats i dont mean physically)
if i was to use a jc friendometer she would just about scrape in the top 20 (just being honest not malicious)
i dont quite get this so called me and rott business
Pats can be a nasty to use her termBi@tch she sees that as a badge of honouri spoke to her in msn and found out she was copying and pasting to her friend every word
so i decided to tell her the biggest load of sh ite i could think of
i contradicted myself so many times in these conversations , quite deliberately
she was so wrapped up in cutting and pasting she just never got it
i even asked her to go back and re read the convos
wether she did or didnt i dont know or care
my conclusion is that pats is as thick as the proverbal whale omelette
but i still like herWho cares? Why are you washing your dirty laundry in public? I definately don’t want to see your skidded undies!
i would like to see yours less
that apart its hopefully and end to a silly topic that has quite frankly become an embarassment to pats@pats wrote:
@minim wrote:
The fact remains, you used the example of a picture shown to you in msn and then dragged me into the conversation Pats. Cheap shot.
I am not going to continue rowing with you. You obviously thrive on all the banter and sniping, but it doesn’t float my boat. You have been doing it for years and years and years, and are pretty good at it if I might say so.
I think this thread ended up being unnecessary.
thats what you get for starting a thread to have a sly dig. it backfires. i may be good at banter……..but at least i do it upfront and with good reason. you basically know fook all that went on between me and rott. well …….maybe his version. but your right……..its boring now. i have nothing to be ashamed of. as he?
i wasnt going to comment on this because it is to tedious for words
as i’m tedious i shall
what went on between me and pats if my memory serves me right absolutely nothing
she is just one of a few people i have encountered in my long jc journey
she seems to suggest she knows me intimately(for your benefit pats i dont mean physically)
if i was to use a jc friendometer she would just about scrape in the top 20 (just being honest not malicious)
i dont quite get this so called me and rott business
Pats can be a nasty to use her termBi@tch she sees that as a badge of honouri spoke to her in msn and found out she was copying and pasting to her friend every word
so i decided to tell her the biggest load of sh ite i could think of
i contradicted myself so many times in these conversations , quite deliberately
she was so wrapped up in cutting and pasting she just never got it
i even asked her to go back and re read the convos
wether she did or didnt i dont know or care
my conclusion is that pats is as thick as the proverbal whale omelette
but i still like her@forumhostpb wrote:
As it happens Sharon this simply isn’t true.
My neighbour is (oe was) a Director of a major record company and was responsible for sales (of CDs). He worked for them for some 20+ years then along came the internet and illegal (i.e. free) downloading.
Net result is that their sales crashed, and loads of people were made redundant – including him.
After all why should people pay to buy a CD or pay for a download when they can rip off the artist or record company by getting it (illegally) for free???
could be something to do with the overinflated price of a cd
well done the supermarkets for bringing the price downwomen are so boring
i’m to lazy to google
mine is the brad smart mother fu’c’ker scene in pulp fiction@smiley wrote:
:P yes mummy
you know the address you sent me 3 times
the one i clearly mislaid
please try again@fastcars wrote:
Yet another in the long line of old regs who post their personal farewells only to find that they cant drag themselves away…. no matter how hard they try.
what a tragedy for you
not having anything to be superior about@(f)politics? wrote:
@kevin wrote:
the case against fox hunting is based on the barbarism
its gladatorial in its cruelty
shoot me just dont boil me in oil firstTo be fair Kevin it is rarely as barbaric as the “activists” show you, its usually fairly quick capture or escape whichever comes first and an extremely fast death. It isnt hours and hours of being run down to exhaustion and all that malarkey, the chase more often than not over one way or the other within minutes, wether they get away or get caught.
I will stay out of this one now i promise lol
why should you stay out of it
i have a sister who hunts
its wrong to chase a quarry to its death@sir Actor wrote:
@kevin wrote:
the case against fox hunting is based on the barbarism
its gladatorial in its cruelty
shoot me just dont boil me in oil firsthmm…have you ever seen a lamb being slaughtered. No you haven’t or you wouldn’t have posted such a ridiculous comment.
well sir who clearly knows me
i was brought up around farms
i have seen every farm animal killed
never seen one hunted first
