minim

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/07/nick-cohen-jimmy-savile-child-abuse

I don’t normally hold with posting links but would rather type my own thoughts, however in light of this thread I thought this article from the Guardian quite apt at demonstrating how important it is not to undermine or belittle claims of sexual abuse.

I too…[Read more]

I have just watched it.

I just don’t understand how people didn’t know. I was trying to remember a time when I didn’t know. Seeing some footage of top of the pops and clunk click etc reminds me of how uncomfortable the children used to look when with him. All you have to do is look at body language. Children are very good barometers. If a…[Read more]

hi per bowl eee

So did I… i seem to have trodden on a corn without realising.

I’d apologise but don’t know what for 8)

Blimey.. who rattled your cage!!!!

But ok….grumpy git

I’m clever! Not sure about the rest of them :)

I rarely read the boards here actually……………..whats up Noddy? you seem to have sucked on a lemon lately!

@Terry wrote:

@minim wrote:

Richard, who was not war like, but really a bit bookish, was framed.

Don’t get Richard III mixed up with Richard Madeley. :roll:

You obviously don’t read around subjects much or you would know that there are many really well thought of historical experts who believe that Richard III was innocent of the murder and that…[Read more]

Oh.. and Henry Tudor didn’t tell anyone the boys were dead until 1486….. why would that be then? And that was when he married their older sister.

There are too many things that do not add up if Richard was supposed to have killed them.

I am not re-writing history, there are lots of people who believe that Richard was innocent, and that Henry VII killed the boys in the tower.

Nobody knows for sure what happened to the boys ….it is all speculation. But the version that most history books contain is the Tudor version. Henry VII and then Henry VIII and Elizabeth made sure of that. So Richard III was said to be the murderer. I just don’t believe that he could have been. He was a very studious and quiet man. He was…[Read more]

@panda12 wrote:

@minim wrote:

@sceptical guy wrote:

He might well be nnocent of that murder of the Princes….

the Royals have said they’ll refuse to let him be buried in Windsor or Westminster..they suggest Leiecester Cathedral…

I reckon York Minster would be good…he was very popular in York and always felt it was his home…

Henry very…

[Read more]

@sceptical guy wrote:

He might well be nnocent of that murder of the Princes….

the Royals have said they’ll refuse to let him be buried in Windsor or Westminster..they suggest Leiecester Cathedral…

I reckon York Minster would be good…he was very popular in York and always felt it was his home…

Henry very likely killed the boys in the…[Read more]

I am sure he was a lovely person Mrs T, and we all know how much he did for Stoke Mandeville etc. But most people who molest and abuse are charming and seem beyond reproach. That is how they all get away with it.

In my opinion, and it is only my opinion…. I think he did what Jen-Jen said and more. I can remember having a conversation with…[Read more]

They could make replicas of the bones, and put those on display, and bury the others with pomp and circumstance. Thats if they are really sure they are the bones of Richard III.

@toybulldog wrote:

I’ll tell ya what bores me rubes.

Women saying that ALL MEN are cowards and don’t recognise Truth. The same women like Vee and Mims who pontificate endlessly on boards about what great mothers they are and how their golden female offspring are more important than life itself.

Did they ever for one second think that if they gave…

[Read more]

Lights are on but nobodys home

click click

:lol:

Its not only simple its obvious, so why is it difficult to do? Why do people make everything complicated? Pride? Embarrassment? Fear of rejection?

There has been a recurring theme of mixed messages and misunderstandings in my life. And even when I did do what it says on the poster, I still managed to coc k things up! Mostly because what I…[Read more]

I think we call it Vetting and Barring though. No difference and interchangeable with Scotland. And I think my lot have to be in the system by 2014.

But….. how sucessful will it be? It will only work if everyone is updated regularly, and that relies on computers, and computers rely on human input, and we know how unreliable that can be. :)

And that was kind of my point, that they are worthless bits of paper. And that a certificate obtained in France is no proof of anything.

In the UK its the VBS not the PVG, although not 100% sure of that. We are all being moved onto the register before 2015, so not sure when we have to apply to be registered yet. They still use the CRB checks…[Read more]