So it seems scep would now rather rally the cause of Mexican criminals, than a legitimately installed Leader of State. Interesting.

1 member liked this post.

sceptical guy wrote:

All of our British supporters of Trump’s need to protect American should note.

Grabs pen and pad*

sceptical guy wrote:

The U.S. State has turned child abuser. 2000 children some as young as a few months hold have been taken from their parents when crossing the border into the United States.

You fail to mention the parents of these children are criminals and being arrested. All criminals have their children removed from their custody upon arrest. It is common procedure throughout the Western World, and a practice you approve of.

If I am caught committing a serious crime, and need to be imprisoned, what would you suggest happens to my young children? Take them with me off to Marshalsea?

Do you think this might act as a deterrent to Mexicans with children wishing to illegally smuggle themselves over the border?

I know it would to me. If I “knew” my children could be taken from me in the event of a crime, I would certainly have to think twice.

Isn’t there a saying some thing like, if you can’t do the time, then don’t do the crime ?

 

3 members liked this post.

All I see is an unsubstantiated claim, times 4 (four).

 

Got any ifs, buts or maybes you can bung in?

😁

• This reply was modified 7 years ago by

Ge wrote:

Morgan. wrote:

I’m sure if you want to prove yourself right, you’ll post links :)

Post links to what Alfie?

Ge wrote:

we have discussed this previously

Ge wrote:

we have discussed this before, in depth.

Ge wrote:

we have have discussed this exact topic in depth previously.

Ge wrote:

can’t recall conversations

I’m sure you’ll figure it out JC’s resident Political pundit.

I’m sure if you want to prove yourself right, you’ll post links :)

 

Well well. Thanks for spoiling what was interesting debate. I’m going to assume you’re drunk now.

Keep repeating the same silly accusation doesn’t make it any more true. Au contraire. It’s also rather unbecoming for a grown man.

Enjoy the rest of your bottle(s)

 

Ge wrote:

As I stated, we have discussed this before, in depth.

We haven’t. I don’t engage in political debate. I can’t engage in political debate. I’m incapable of political debate to a standard you could accept.

Ge wrote:

I haven’t helped you understand anything at all,

You have. The Chattering classes was a good lead.

• This reply was modified 7 years ago by

I’m genuinely ignorant to this, although I have leaned something new today. You have helped me to understand much better, but not fully. It seems you don’t wish to go further. I can understand you may not want to.

I’m further confused. It seems the term Liberal isn’t Political as much as Social?

I have always taken “Liberal” in a social context to mean the people that were perhaps welcome to coloured people next door, or don’t mind people rolling joints at a party, or don’t mind the odd bit of wifeswapping, I always thought that was the “Liberals” the hippy types.

Liberal Jews and Muslims are the ones that don’t take it too seriously at all. Almost secular.

Now you suggest the Liberals don’t want coloureds next door?

• This reply was modified 7 years ago by

I have just read this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chattering_classes

I had heard the term Chattering classes before but didn’t know it’s meaning. Now I have a much better idea.

Ge wrote:

a class that has put their political and economic interests above everyone else for the past 25-30 years in particular, starting with Major and then Blair and continued by Clegg and Cameron and now May

So this suggests that a Liberal Snowflake is probably not a Liberal Party voter and just as well Labour or Tory, correct?

Ge wrote:

The liberal snowflake class, previously known as the chattering class.

So this “change of ID” occurred about 25-30 years ago?

So it seems, a Liberal Snowflake is little or nothing to directly do with the Liberal Party? In which case, why do you think the word Liberal was used?

Maybe a Tory Snowflake would be more apt?

 

[Author]

Posts