Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 June, 2006 at 6:19 pm #224434
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
20 Gig of hard disk space for music downloads?? He’s a bit of a rascal your lad then eh?
I hope that he doesn’t download any virus type files with them – or you’ll not be best pleased with him.
No, That’s ok. Pretty up on latest virus/spyware stuff and know how to use things like Hijackthis to look for insiduous ba£tards. If anything looks odd I just wipe the HD, re-install and wipe again. He doesn’t know I keep an eye on what he does!
(Unless, of course he knows who I am on here, in which case he does now! 8-[ )Hello Dad! :D
10 June, 2006 at 6:14 pm #224969@Bad Manners wrote:
I’ll be proved right though. Wait and see.
Even more bitter and twisted methinks! :lol:
10 June, 2006 at 6:08 pm #225142@kevin wrote:
2 of my neighbours keep pigeons
i have just ordered an air rifle
no idea if its legal
i’m going to pop everyone that lands in my garden
vermin aren’t they?For discreet control of small populations of pigeons a .22 air rifle with hollow point pellets is recommended. Go for a chest shot, this will help prevent over penetration of the quarry and possible damage to surrounding property.
If you find that any of your shot birds have leg rings (indicating a Homing Pigeon Society or club) notify the appropriate organisation or a local pigeon fancier.
As much care as possible must be taken to avoid accidents.
The use of an air rifle is not suitable where adverse public reaction is suspected even though it may be the most effective method of removal.
It is against the law, in England and Wales, to fire an air rifle within 50 feet of the centre of a highway, if by doing so you cause any member of the public, using that right of way, to be injured, interrupted or endangered. This offence could be committed, for example, by someone on private property close to a road who uses an air rifle in a way which endangers people on the road.
Always bear in mind the possibility of a ricochet.
10 June, 2006 at 3:45 pm #225123@Bad Manners wrote:
Paraquay looked second rate because Paraquay were second rate, but if they’d been a bit more adventurous they could have knicked an equaliser.
I disagree that Paraguay were second rate. England stopped them playing in the first half. The (dismal) change of formation allowed Paraguay to pressure England second half.
I’m looking forward to the Paraguay v Sweden game.
10 June, 2006 at 3:37 pm #225121We’ve got the squad, the coach isn’t using HIS squad! Paraguay looked second rate up untill the point Owen was taken off.
Changing the formation from 4-4-2 to 4-5-1 nearly cost us the win.
10 June, 2006 at 3:11 pm #224789Remind me who had a ceasefire in place, and who attacked who PB! :roll:
10 June, 2006 at 12:57 pm #225042COME ON ENGRRRLAND!! :D
10 June, 2006 at 12:34 am #224787I don’t think a ceasefire suits the US and Isreal at the moment. They seem determined to maintain the conflict with Islam on a global scale.
10 June, 2006 at 12:11 am #2245319 June, 2006 at 2:05 am #224551@tommy-toxen wrote:
Well of course. I mean, if you just hang them, they snap their neck, and just dangle. Well how boring is that?
That’s where the cheese-wire comes in. :twisted:
-
AuthorPosts
