panda12

The Big Society sounds like a rich man’s version of the Big Issue.

@Irish_Lucy wrote:

Next up is ………….

*clambers up on the soapbox (pushes Words and Terry off)

*clears throat

Based on the hair colour alignment when it comes to voting, I would have voted for Romney. :P

@jen_jen wrote:

I’m not white, I’m a slightly olive complexion…can I start a campaign for the recognition of olivism? :lol:

Lol

That reminds me of Jedi being recognised as a religion.

So, we want Brown and Olive to be added to the Ethnic Questionnaire, hehe!

Actually, aren’t olives green or red? :shock:

@kent f OBE wrote:

Sorry Panda…..I am brown and my section is British Asian so you can join “us” if you like with open arms :lol:

Lol.

Mine is White / Black Caribbean but my dad, although born in Jamaica is of Indian ancestry but there isn’t a section for White / Black Asian Caribbean. :D

*scurries off to confused.com :P

@Wordsworth60 wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Barack Obama had a black father and a white mother.

He’s not black. He’s brown, like me.

Maybe some people voted for his white half and some voted for his black half.

He could do 50 shades of Grey all on his own! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Tut! That’s hairism. :D

So, analysing the American electorate in…[Read more]

Barack Obama had a black father and a white mother.

He’s not black. He’s brown, like me.

Maybe some people voted for his white half and some voted for his black half.

@Terry wrote:

Another interesting statistic is that Obama received 10 million fewer votes than he did four years ago. In the back of his mind the President must be wondering what the future holds for him and if there’s another bin Laden moment that will boost his flagging popularity. He certainly needs one.

Five reasons why Obama…[Read more]

@J_in_France wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

If I wrote a letter like that where there is a glaring grammatical error in the first sentence, and which showed my lack of vocabulary by repetition of words such as allegedly and understand, I wouldn’t put it in the public domain.

And he’s an MP?

so you disagree with what it says?

You really are dumb. :roll:

@Terry wrote:

If I wrote a letter like that where there is a glaring grammatical error in the first sentence, and which showed my lack of vocabulary by repetition of words such as allegedly and understand, I wouldn’t put it in the public domain.

And he’s an MP?

@jen_jen wrote:

I was commenting on the interview and the Prime Minister’s response, not the validity of anything appearing on the internet.

*hands Jen a brick wall with which to bang head against. :P

@jen_jen wrote:

I was hoping for a thought-provoking thread, I was disappointed.

And I look at all new threads, regardless of title…maybe next time I’ll be more selective and look at who started the thread first…

Hehe!

@jen_jen wrote:

Sad, very sad…

Agreed.

For J_in_Trance:

“Red red wine you make me feel so fine
You keep me rocking all of the time
Red red wine you make me feel so grand
I feel a million dollars when your just in my hand”

@J_in_France wrote:

Just thought I would see how many views this topic got

Will you be excluding the number of times you click on it to boost your view count?

@J_in_France wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:

I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.

They are not, of course.

Does he?

Why don’t you read the opening post of this thread before you post your inane…[Read more]

@jen_jen wrote:

I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:

I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.

They are not, of course.

I shall make a donation.

Excellent idea.

I have no idea who they are.

@Terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@tinks wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

The names are on the internet. They are therefore, in the public domain. I don’t see that Philip Schofield did anything wrong.

What this does highlight is that the internet is an uncontrollable beast and anyone can post anything whether it is fact or fiction.

That’s the real issue here for…

[Read more]

@tinks wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

The names are on the internet. They are therefore, in the public domain. I don’t see that Philip Schofield did anything wrong.

What this does highlight is that the internet is an uncontrollable beast and anyone can post anything whether it is fact or fiction.

That’s the real issue here for me, not Philip Schofield’s…

[Read more]

@Terry wrote:

@DANNY2011 wrote:

if u need it explaining terry shame on u 4 not even knowing what happened that day

Tell me what happened on November 11, 2011

Now you’re just being facetious.